Yes, I’m 69 and wondering if I should try to catch Omicron now, plus whether I should take ivermectin first or wait until there are some real symptoms. In other words, is the degree of natural immunity you develop directly proportional to how sick you got?
Also, Dr. VB, do you think people who are asymptomatic are spreading the virus, wh…
Yes, I’m 69 and wondering if I should try to catch Omicron now, plus whether I should take ivermectin first or wait until there are some real symptoms. In other words, is the degree of natural immunity you develop directly proportional to how sick you got?
Also, Dr. VB, do you think people who are asymptomatic are spreading the virus, whether vaxxed, unvaxxed, not going to develop symptoms, or going to develop them? The “mainstream” position, I believe, is that people are most infectious in the day or two before they develop symptoms.
While I think use of the word “sinners” is a bit off the mark and counterproductive, thank you so much for what I feel is your unique and truly stellar contribution to the world at this time.
Dr. Geert did notspeak of „sinners“? He speaks of „Antigenic sin“, this is something completely different. I try to find his explanation for this manifestation and then send it to you. Maybe you can also try to google the term „antigenic sin“, I am sure you will find some explanation.
"Original Antigenic Sin" is a popular nickname for "immune priming." Immune priming states that the 1st of a kind virus you see is imprinted on your immune memory. In the case of covid vaxes, they imprint the alpha spike (the initial variant) in your immune memory. Every time it sees a similar spike it calls up antibodies designed to fit the alpha variant. That's why the immunity "wears off" with subsequent variants. The antibodies are an increasingly poor fit for the remodeled spikes.
I don't believe in the concept of sin, unless you define it as foolishness. Nobody can help being the way they are, defined as separate individuals (which I don't think we are, see Alan Watts) we all act in accordance with our experience and beliefs, which we cannot choose. You can change someone's behavior by making them see things they aren't yet seeing clearly, but accusing them of immoral behavior is only likely to make them defensive and less open to what you're trying to tell them. JMO.
Yes, I’m 69 and wondering if I should try to catch Omicron now, plus whether I should take ivermectin first or wait until there are some real symptoms. In other words, is the degree of natural immunity you develop directly proportional to how sick you got?
Also, Dr. VB, do you think people who are asymptomatic are spreading the virus, whether vaxxed, unvaxxed, not going to develop symptoms, or going to develop them? The “mainstream” position, I believe, is that people are most infectious in the day or two before they develop symptoms.
While I think use of the word “sinners” is a bit off the mark and counterproductive, thank you so much for what I feel is your unique and truly stellar contribution to the world at this time.
Be aware that taking Ivermectin prior to trying to get infected may frustrate your plans to get infected.
Dr. Geert did notspeak of „sinners“? He speaks of „Antigenic sin“, this is something completely different. I try to find his explanation for this manifestation and then send it to you. Maybe you can also try to google the term „antigenic sin“, I am sure you will find some explanation.
"Original Antigenic Sin" is a popular nickname for "immune priming." Immune priming states that the 1st of a kind virus you see is imprinted on your immune memory. In the case of covid vaxes, they imprint the alpha spike (the initial variant) in your immune memory. Every time it sees a similar spike it calls up antibodies designed to fit the alpha variant. That's why the immunity "wears off" with subsequent variants. The antibodies are an increasingly poor fit for the remodeled spikes.
Actually he did, see the last paragraph.
Creating this bioweapon is a sin, no?
I don't believe in the concept of sin, unless you define it as foolishness. Nobody can help being the way they are, defined as separate individuals (which I don't think we are, see Alan Watts) we all act in accordance with our experience and beliefs, which we cannot choose. You can change someone's behavior by making them see things they aren't yet seeing clearly, but accusing them of immoral behavior is only likely to make them defensive and less open to what you're trying to tell them. JMO.
Yes. I think he was making sone wordplay.
I found it! Sorry that I did not see it and thus misunderstood you.
Actually he should have called them “criminals”, they know exactly what they are doing, trying to force us directly or indirectly to take the jab.
By “them” I mean big pharma and the governments they working with.
He did also call it “the unforgivable sin” and “the deadliesst sin ever” when talking about vaccinating children.
I cannot find it, would you please copy/paste for me?
Yes, sinners is a bit off the mark...I prefer the word demons.
sir, take ginger.