In my opinion, Geert's message started out as a message/warning/plea to his peers/colleagues in the scientific world. To the people who had the power to put in place or withdraw pandemic/vaccine -related policy. He never meant it to be a message to lay people (if they understood it, great, but that was not his original intention). But as…
In my opinion, Geert's message started out as a message/warning/plea to his peers/colleagues in the scientific world. To the people who had the power to put in place or withdraw pandemic/vaccine -related policy. He never meant it to be a message to lay people (if they understood it, great, but that was not his original intention). But as time went on and his warnings were ignored by public health authorities and his fellow scientists, it was the public that started listening to him and trying to understand his message, however complex it might be.
In my opinion, Geert's message started out as a message/warning/plea to his peers/colleagues in the scientific world. To the people who had the power to put in place or withdraw pandemic/vaccine -related policy. He never meant it to be a message to lay people (if they understood it, great, but that was not his original intention). But as time went on and his warnings were ignored by public health authorities and his fellow scientists, it was the public that started listening to him and trying to understand his message, however complex it might be.
He doesn't even have that much of an audience here. Which, I believe, speaks to my point about how he communicates.