Goal: Our newsletter aims at providing regular updates on the science and the truth behind the current pandemic. We are dedicated to bringing the real science to the table and sharing how the truth invalidates the current narrative, for which scientific evidence is now increasingly lacking. We’ll provide an update on a
My greatest concern now is; how long do spike protein continue to be produced within the vaccinated. I sincerely hope this is examined, and of course, findings shared in public. The vaccinated have a right to know this.
I read regarding the Omicron BA.2 from Israel… almost all cases are now of the BA.2. They indicated they required no treatment, as the symptoms were very mild. Low grade temp, some muscle aches.. not much. The article stated, an increase in transmission was not noted… However, Fauci and His Gang, cannot let a great “Cough” go to waste. Just in time for midterm elections I am sure. TY for your updates Sir.
Number 5, warning of a new surge with a new variant, is especially interesting in light of item 1 that speaks of the finding that surges after the initial outbreak were primarily artifacts of false positive PCR tests. I imagine Fauci will drive the next scare with yet more false positives and there will be plenty of suckers for it who, even two years in, haven't learned a thing.
Item 1 is a preprint that seems to offer strong analytical arguments (from people outside the world of microbiology?) for the perverse effects of PCR testing, including the helpful new acronyms of MDSCV (MisDiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus 2) and FPMCCT (False-Positive Multiplication by Compulsory Contact Testing). On the face of it, a paper that so clearly questions the prevailing narratives (as described explicitly in the paper itself) is going to have trouble with being peer-reviewed by those enmeshed in those narratives. It is described as submitted by The Lancet in November of last year, but there seems to be no published commentary on it, although lots of people seem to have read it. Is commentary prohibited before peer-review?
If the authors' arguments are correct, they would seem to undermine the case for permanent vaccination regimes to respond to ongoing new variants that would seem to underpin the business cases of large pharma companies. This seems to be a different argument for stopping vaccination than Geert's arguments to stop vaccination in order to avoid creating vaccine-proof variants. Does Geert have a view about the paper, and in particular the suggested mechanism of exosomes? I would be interested to know.
Thank you for your continued posting and analysis of information and data throughout this pandemic.
I read your October article "What if Israel fails the Stress Test" with great interest, in which the health minister of Israel predicted that the first boosters would reduce cases to zero for about six months, while you predicted that the cases would plateau at a higher level than before and then spike dramatically after only a couple of months. Of course, you were correct and your hand-drawn graph was spot-on with what actually occurred.
I have since followed the daily cases (rate per million) in Israel and it appears that the dramatic spike that occurred in late December/early January has been dropping (fourth booster effect?) but appears to now be leveling off at a much, much higher plateau, and perhaps starting to increase again. This is interesting because the plateau level is so much higher than ever before (600 cases per million) and the plateau/valley appears to be of shorter duration than before - it's only been leveled-off for about a month as opposed to a two month plateau/valley previously.
If you could provide any insight as to what that current Israel data is showing us, I would greatly appreciate it.
Dr. VandenBossche, I am concerned. Are these injections self-spreading? It is starting to be talked about by some publicly now. This would be a world wide disaster.
Dr. Bossche, What do you make of the 1000 daily COVID deaths in the US (from an omicron max of 2500) even with cases down below 30K (from an omicron max of 800K) and hospitalizations at 21K (from an omicron peak of 150K, per the NYTimes)? These people cannot be dying via the traditional route of getting progressively sicker over 2 weeks.
If they had ADE, we would expect the daily deaths in January to be stratospheric, not the 2500 claimed. As far as I can tell, that means most of these deaths are people that died of "vaccine" adverse events, and then tested positive for COVID. Does anyone have reports from the hospitals or any sense if this is right?
And if this is the case, why aren't other countries reporting a similar phenomena? I understand the US pays a "bounty" to hospitals for patients that die of COVID, but I wouldn't think that would work for people that are dead on arrival.
As I understand it, that 84% increase in excess mortality for ages 25 through 44 is non-covid deaths. I wish that data could be laid out clearly, how many of people that age died from covid and how many did not.
I haven't seen any recent comment by Dr Bossche on the current SC2 scenario. Many are saying Omicron and its variants are the end of the pandemic. Has Geert commented on this? And have the scientists determined how Omicron evolved as it appeared out of nowhere?
My greatest concern now is; how long do spike protein continue to be produced within the vaccinated. I sincerely hope this is examined, and of course, findings shared in public. The vaccinated have a right to know this.
I read regarding the Omicron BA.2 from Israel… almost all cases are now of the BA.2. They indicated they required no treatment, as the symptoms were very mild. Low grade temp, some muscle aches.. not much. The article stated, an increase in transmission was not noted… However, Fauci and His Gang, cannot let a great “Cough” go to waste. Just in time for midterm elections I am sure. TY for your updates Sir.
Number 5, warning of a new surge with a new variant, is especially interesting in light of item 1 that speaks of the finding that surges after the initial outbreak were primarily artifacts of false positive PCR tests. I imagine Fauci will drive the next scare with yet more false positives and there will be plenty of suckers for it who, even two years in, haven't learned a thing.
Item 1 is a preprint that seems to offer strong analytical arguments (from people outside the world of microbiology?) for the perverse effects of PCR testing, including the helpful new acronyms of MDSCV (MisDiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus 2) and FPMCCT (False-Positive Multiplication by Compulsory Contact Testing). On the face of it, a paper that so clearly questions the prevailing narratives (as described explicitly in the paper itself) is going to have trouble with being peer-reviewed by those enmeshed in those narratives. It is described as submitted by The Lancet in November of last year, but there seems to be no published commentary on it, although lots of people seem to have read it. Is commentary prohibited before peer-review?
If the authors' arguments are correct, they would seem to undermine the case for permanent vaccination regimes to respond to ongoing new variants that would seem to underpin the business cases of large pharma companies. This seems to be a different argument for stopping vaccination than Geert's arguments to stop vaccination in order to avoid creating vaccine-proof variants. Does Geert have a view about the paper, and in particular the suggested mechanism of exosomes? I would be interested to know.
I am looking forward to reading your paper you are working on, Dr. Vanden Bossche. When will you post it?
Dr. Vanden Bossche,
Thank you for your continued posting and analysis of information and data throughout this pandemic.
I read your October article "What if Israel fails the Stress Test" with great interest, in which the health minister of Israel predicted that the first boosters would reduce cases to zero for about six months, while you predicted that the cases would plateau at a higher level than before and then spike dramatically after only a couple of months. Of course, you were correct and your hand-drawn graph was spot-on with what actually occurred.
I have since followed the daily cases (rate per million) in Israel and it appears that the dramatic spike that occurred in late December/early January has been dropping (fourth booster effect?) but appears to now be leveling off at a much, much higher plateau, and perhaps starting to increase again. This is interesting because the plateau level is so much higher than ever before (600 cases per million) and the plateau/valley appears to be of shorter duration than before - it's only been leveled-off for about a month as opposed to a two month plateau/valley previously.
If you could provide any insight as to what that current Israel data is showing us, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you for sharing these important articles. The Corporate Media is entirely complicit in this sham perpetrated upon the world.
Dr. VandenBossche, I am concerned. Are these injections self-spreading? It is starting to be talked about by some publicly now. This would be a world wide disaster.
Dr. Bossche, What do you make of the 1000 daily COVID deaths in the US (from an omicron max of 2500) even with cases down below 30K (from an omicron max of 800K) and hospitalizations at 21K (from an omicron peak of 150K, per the NYTimes)? These people cannot be dying via the traditional route of getting progressively sicker over 2 weeks.
If they had ADE, we would expect the daily deaths in January to be stratospheric, not the 2500 claimed. As far as I can tell, that means most of these deaths are people that died of "vaccine" adverse events, and then tested positive for COVID. Does anyone have reports from the hospitals or any sense if this is right?
And if this is the case, why aren't other countries reporting a similar phenomena? I understand the US pays a "bounty" to hospitals for patients that die of COVID, but I wouldn't think that would work for people that are dead on arrival.
I’m shocked that The Lancet would publish the damning PCR study. But I guess “they” are covering their tracks?
As I understand it, that 84% increase in excess mortality for ages 25 through 44 is non-covid deaths. I wish that data could be laid out clearly, how many of people that age died from covid and how many did not.
I haven't seen any recent comment by Dr Bossche on the current SC2 scenario. Many are saying Omicron and its variants are the end of the pandemic. Has Geert commented on this? And have the scientists determined how Omicron evolved as it appeared out of nowhere?
That first article is fascinating. I would sure like to see your thoughts on it.