60 Comments
User's avatar
Canary in a Covid World's avatar

Thanks ‘Canary' Vanden Bossche for the short and sweet critique :) :)

DeepBlue's avatar

"because if there’s one thing humanity is good at, it’s learning the hard way."

- Nah, we don't learn at all.

Greed and avarice dominate.

boscohorowitz's avatar

Oh, we learn. But so do greed and avarice.

Shauna's avatar

Most people are always good...jsut want to enjoy their lives and family and earn a living and have a comfortable shelter...it's the OTHER 2% that need to control and HAVE IT ALL... History speaks to how this turns out ! However, it is a rumoured from 2016 out of Washington that a certain leader...never reads anything - I know....worse than a bad bad sci fi movie

boscohorowitz's avatar

I disagree. Yes, there are a few % who are especially bad, but I firmly believe this: we deserve the leaders we tolerate. Funny. I was just reading old Colonel Sherburn, one of my role models:

https://steemit.com/twain/@stevescoins/the-speech-of-colonel-sherburn

Sean's avatar

Sadly I think your numbers give people too much credit. This world is good versus evil and there is a sizable amount t of evil in this world. Def not 2%. Thankfully Trump is in now

Luc Lelievre's avatar

It becomes very scary at about 30 min. We must prepare for a healthcare system run by AI, resembling a Minority Report-style healthcare based on what an AI-driven robot doctor determines our mental state predicts. And there seems not much we can do to stop this dreaded thing!

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/ai-healthcare-and-the-end-of-freedom?

Ann Marie's avatar

Thank you, Dr. Vanden Bossche, for this thoughtful summary.

Dan Star's avatar

Cancer BTW is metabolic disease. Fix Mitochondria and you fix cancer.

Dan Star's avatar

The inventor of the mRNA Framework, Dr Robert Malone, gave up on the cancer mRNA research in the early 1990s because it caused cancers because targeting was not possible.

aj's avatar

Tech bro billionaires giving health advice is a sign of the apocalypse

David Schmitt's avatar

Technology is not science. Science looks and learns from the system that is, sometimes rearranging to see what might be learned by testing hypotheses and noticing differences due to tiny changes. It wants to know what is and what got things--and maybe us--to this place.

Many technologists have no love of the system that is. They do not care to know it intimately. The system of Nature has no meaning for them other than something that does not work to their pleasure.

There is a doing of technology that does not necessarily involve the beloved "disruption" so glorified by modern business and technology.

We wait.

boscohorowitz's avatar

Used to be we just opened Pandora's Box. Now we mass manufacture.

David Schmitt's avatar

I think that there is an "us" versu[s] "them" aspect to this.

boscohorowitz's avatar

Modern humanity's basic worldview is humans against reality.

David Schmitt's avatar

It took me a second or two to get this.

Yes, they think they are alienated from the real, or some do, I suppose. What is curious is that they gorge themselves on Hollywood movie trash that claims to present reality better than the audience can access it themselves (which is a ridiculous proposition, of course).

We cannot separate ourselves from reality, we can only neurotically (or psychotically) refuse to recognize it and integrate ourselves with it.

boscohorowitz's avatar

"We cannot separate ourselves from reality, we can only neurotically (or psychotically) refuse to recognize it and integrate ourselves with it."

Reality has been outlawed. It approaches us from the hinterlands like vandals bent on sacking Rome.

David Schmitt's avatar

Fortunately, reality did not pass the Bar exam.

krishna e bera's avatar

They "woke" and didnt accept reality, so now they recite new narratives and believe in them

Shauna's avatar

Science deals only with facts and truth...technology is a mechanical .....oil and water ... but intelligent minds already know this

David Schmitt's avatar

This has a good start. I would try exploring this a bit more to mine out the added gems in your thinking.

Casper Stith's avatar

We just sit idly by and watch it happen like the cowardly sheeple that we are.

Our hero doctors can’t even get on camera and acknowledge that we have an ongoing genocide with a known (cytotoxic T cells attacking healthy cells expressing spike) mechanism of harm, as millions die off..

We have normalized genocide. Our collective iq rivals that of lab rats, but they at least have a self preservation gene remaining..

The fact that people have simply moved on while this unfolds ensures their newest mRNA scheme goes through.

You can head on over to Geerts other pay forum if you wanna further waste your time and money, suckers.

Janis's avatar

If Mr. Bossche was so concerned about the integrity of vaccinology, it would make sense to start with the basics—terminology. In the pre-mRNA era, a vaccine was defined as an antigen administered to prime immunity against that specific antigen. As long as mRNA technology remained within its proper domain as a gene therapy product or prodrug, the integrity of vaccinology was preserved.

However, the effort to avoid proper testing and to ensure liability exemptions resulted in the gene therapy product and prodrug combination being labelled as a vaccine. If all continues down this path, we may see terms like:

• behavioural vaccine: specific activities designed to stimulate body (e.g. the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway through practices such as breathing exercises, which promote NK cell development and regulatory T cell activation), to prime immunity against specific antigen,

• dietary vaccine: a form of oral immunization where edible plants or foods are administered to prime immunity against that specific antigen when consumed.

• Etc.:

Robert W Malone MD might not agree with this, but it is crucial not to fall prey to the deconstructive relativism of postmodernism, which undermines the precision of terminology. Rejecting the classification of gene therapy jabs as vaccines safeguards against the proliferation of such nonsensical discourse.

Casper Stith's avatar

Anyone still paying for this Substack is a sucker…

Matter of fact I want my money back as I was banking on the apocalypse by now…

No offense intended, suckers.

Sean's avatar

The apocalypse is right around the corner. Any time now, hang in there

Jorma Talas's avatar

Would I be right to presume that I should cancel my subscription to the Substack?

I purchased an annual subscription on the presumption that I would access GVB’s publications. Has he abandoned those who were convinced to join this forum?

All respect to him, but I feel a little badly treated.

Sean's avatar

I left 2 weeks ago. He hardly writes on here. He never replies to questions. And he still is holding out for the mysterious doomsday virus that is always just around the corner.

Light2theWorld's avatar

Thank you for being so candid. Very much appreciated.

SUSAN MERNICK's avatar

You are absolutely right! Keep going!!!

Marcella Nelson's avatar

I thoroughly enjoy it when you are really angry and of course, agree with you 100%💘

Yeowoman's avatar

The industry is out of control :(