Most people are always good...jsut want to enjoy their lives and family and earn a living and have a comfortable shelter...it's the OTHER 2% that need to control and HAVE IT ALL... History speaks to how this turns out ! However, it is a rumoured from 2016 out of Washington that a certain leader...never reads anything - I know....worse than a bad bad sci fi movie
I disagree. Yes, there are a few % who are especially bad, but I firmly believe this: we deserve the leaders we tolerate. Funny. I was just reading old Colonel Sherburn, one of my role models:
I've read that the majority of cancers are caused by environmental factors e.g. pollution, synthetic chemicals, gmo foods... We should focus on cleaning up all of that but what, it's too boring or not a big money maker? This guy seems scarily ignorant of the natural world around him. We keep seeing that just because a person has financial wealth doesn't mean they're intelligent or wise.
It becomes very scary at about 30 min. We must prepare for a healthcare system run by AI, resembling a Minority Report-style healthcare based on what an AI-driven robot doctor determines our mental state predicts. And there seems not much we can do to stop this dreaded thing!
The inventor of the mRNA Framework, Dr Robert Malone, gave up on the cancer mRNA research in the early 1990s because it caused cancers because targeting was not possible.
Technology is not science. Science looks and learns from the system that is, sometimes rearranging to see what might be learned by testing hypotheses and noticing differences due to tiny changes. It wants to know what is and what got things--and maybe us--to this place.
Many technologists have no love of the system that is. They do not care to know it intimately. The system of Nature has no meaning for them other than something that does not work to their pleasure.
There is a doing of technology that does not necessarily involve the beloved "disruption" so glorified by modern business and technology.
Yes, they think they are alienated from the real, or some do, I suppose. What is curious is that they gorge themselves on Hollywood movie trash that claims to present reality better than the audience can access it themselves (which is a ridiculous proposition, of course).
We cannot separate ourselves from reality, we can only neurotically (or psychotically) refuse to recognize it and integrate ourselves with it.
Seems as if they want to shield or cover up their wrong doings regarding the growing population of turbo Cancers from the Covid vaccines. They created a problem that they want to fix. Of course, this solution will be very expensive and will likely set many back financially. It all rings of another diabolical design to rob those who participate, of their dignity.
If Mr. Bossche was so concerned about the integrity of vaccinology, it would make sense to start with the basics—terminology. In the pre-mRNA era, a vaccine was defined as an antigen administered to prime immunity against that specific antigen. As long as mRNA technology remained within its proper domain as a gene therapy product or prodrug, the integrity of vaccinology was preserved.
However, the effort to avoid proper testing and to ensure liability exemptions resulted in the gene therapy product and prodrug combination being labelled as a vaccine. If all continues down this path, we may see terms like:
• behavioural vaccine: specific activities designed to stimulate body (e.g. the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway through practices such as breathing exercises, which promote NK cell development and regulatory T cell activation), to prime immunity against specific antigen,
• dietary vaccine: a form of oral immunization where edible plants or foods are administered to prime immunity against that specific antigen when consumed.
• Etc.:
Robert W Malone MD might not agree with this, but it is crucial not to fall prey to the deconstructive relativism of postmodernism, which undermines the precision of terminology. Rejecting the classification of gene therapy jabs as vaccines safeguards against the proliferation of such nonsensical discourse.
Why don't they "fine tune" the use of mrna before continuing? Are they just ignoring all the evidence that there are several factors that need to be resolved? Ignoring all the studies showing its harms?
Thanks ‘Canary' Vanden Bossche for the short and sweet critique :) :)
"because if there’s one thing humanity is good at, it’s learning the hard way."
- Nah, we don't learn at all.
Greed and avarice dominate.
Oh, we learn. But so do greed and avarice.
Most people are always good...jsut want to enjoy their lives and family and earn a living and have a comfortable shelter...it's the OTHER 2% that need to control and HAVE IT ALL... History speaks to how this turns out ! However, it is a rumoured from 2016 out of Washington that a certain leader...never reads anything - I know....worse than a bad bad sci fi movie
I disagree. Yes, there are a few % who are especially bad, but I firmly believe this: we deserve the leaders we tolerate. Funny. I was just reading old Colonel Sherburn, one of my role models:
https://steemit.com/twain/@stevescoins/the-speech-of-colonel-sherburn
I've read that the majority of cancers are caused by environmental factors e.g. pollution, synthetic chemicals, gmo foods... We should focus on cleaning up all of that but what, it's too boring or not a big money maker? This guy seems scarily ignorant of the natural world around him. We keep seeing that just because a person has financial wealth doesn't mean they're intelligent or wise.
It becomes very scary at about 30 min. We must prepare for a healthcare system run by AI, resembling a Minority Report-style healthcare based on what an AI-driven robot doctor determines our mental state predicts. And there seems not much we can do to stop this dreaded thing!
https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/ai-healthcare-and-the-end-of-freedom?
Thank you, Dr. Vanden Bossche, for this thoughtful summary.
The inventor of the mRNA Framework, Dr Robert Malone, gave up on the cancer mRNA research in the early 1990s because it caused cancers because targeting was not possible.
Cancer BTW is metabolic disease. Fix Mitochondria and you fix cancer.
Tech bro billionaires giving health advice is a sign of the apocalypse
Technology is not science. Science looks and learns from the system that is, sometimes rearranging to see what might be learned by testing hypotheses and noticing differences due to tiny changes. It wants to know what is and what got things--and maybe us--to this place.
Many technologists have no love of the system that is. They do not care to know it intimately. The system of Nature has no meaning for them other than something that does not work to their pleasure.
There is a doing of technology that does not necessarily involve the beloved "disruption" so glorified by modern business and technology.
We wait.
Used to be we just opened Pandora's Box. Now we mass manufacture.
I think that there is an "us" versu[s] "them" aspect to this.
Modern humanity's basic worldview is humans against reality.
It took me a second or two to get this.
Yes, they think they are alienated from the real, or some do, I suppose. What is curious is that they gorge themselves on Hollywood movie trash that claims to present reality better than the audience can access it themselves (which is a ridiculous proposition, of course).
We cannot separate ourselves from reality, we can only neurotically (or psychotically) refuse to recognize it and integrate ourselves with it.
"We cannot separate ourselves from reality, we can only neurotically (or psychotically) refuse to recognize it and integrate ourselves with it."
Reality has been outlawed. It approaches us from the hinterlands like vandals bent on sacking Rome.
Fortunately, reality did not pass the Bar exam.
They "woke" and didnt accept reality, so now they recite new narratives and believe in them
👍
Science deals only with facts and truth...technology is a mechanical .....oil and water ... but intelligent minds already know this
This has a good start. I would try exploring this a bit more to mine out the added gems in your thinking.
Cancers are caused by vaccines..eg brain tumours from the sv40 polio in the 60s.
Seems as if they want to shield or cover up their wrong doings regarding the growing population of turbo Cancers from the Covid vaccines. They created a problem that they want to fix. Of course, this solution will be very expensive and will likely set many back financially. It all rings of another diabolical design to rob those who participate, of their dignity.
If Mr. Bossche was so concerned about the integrity of vaccinology, it would make sense to start with the basics—terminology. In the pre-mRNA era, a vaccine was defined as an antigen administered to prime immunity against that specific antigen. As long as mRNA technology remained within its proper domain as a gene therapy product or prodrug, the integrity of vaccinology was preserved.
However, the effort to avoid proper testing and to ensure liability exemptions resulted in the gene therapy product and prodrug combination being labelled as a vaccine. If all continues down this path, we may see terms like:
• behavioural vaccine: specific activities designed to stimulate body (e.g. the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway through practices such as breathing exercises, which promote NK cell development and regulatory T cell activation), to prime immunity against specific antigen,
• dietary vaccine: a form of oral immunization where edible plants or foods are administered to prime immunity against that specific antigen when consumed.
• Etc.:
Robert W Malone MD might not agree with this, but it is crucial not to fall prey to the deconstructive relativism of postmodernism, which undermines the precision of terminology. Rejecting the classification of gene therapy jabs as vaccines safeguards against the proliferation of such nonsensical discourse.
Thank you for being so candid. Very much appreciated.
You are absolutely right! Keep going!!!
I thoroughly enjoy it when you are really angry and of course, agree with you 100%💘
The industry is out of control :(
Why don't they "fine tune" the use of mrna before continuing? Are they just ignoring all the evidence that there are several factors that need to be resolved? Ignoring all the studies showing its harms?