I have read Dr. Fleming’s book, GVB’s book, Dr. Thomas Cowan’s book (germ theory explanation applied to Covid) Karen Kingston’s substack on the whole pandemic stemming from nanotech synthetic biology, etc. As well as Turtle’s All the Way Down vaccine Science and Myth.
While germ theory is compelling in some regards, I have yet to find an …
I have read Dr. Fleming’s book, GVB’s book, Dr. Thomas Cowan’s book (germ theory explanation applied to Covid) Karen Kingston’s substack on the whole pandemic stemming from nanotech synthetic biology, etc. As well as Turtle’s All the Way Down vaccine Science and Myth.
While germ theory is compelling in some regards, I have yet to find an author who can fully explain all aspects of what we observe in every day life with illness backed by proof the other way. For example, small particulate matter (air pollution) may be what is actually causing someone to be ill, but no one is measuring/studying it in a meaningful way that I can find to show how this could be the cause of respiratory illness vs a “virus”. At the end if the day, a lot of germ theory goes down the path of looking at exosomes (cell death debris) and saying that these particles are one and the same as a viral particle. So something caused cell to die, upon death it releases this exosome - germ theory says this is to warn other cells, viral theory says the particle is a virus and then it goes to other cells and causes more death. Both look at a tiny particle but interpret it very differently.
As with everything, it gets way more complicated, a lot of exosome research is fairly new and these small particles can act in many different ways, it’s not black and white at all.
Regardless, at some point, you have to look at a wider point of view and to me, “viral” or not, something small is being observed, a particle with spikes, and people like GVB seem to have a handle on how and why it mutates and changes over time, observing its changes over time. On the germ theory side, it seems just like everlasting cries of “viruses aren’t real.” Maybe they aren’t, but like Shakespeare famously wrote in Romeo and Juliet, “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” - whether a virus or a circulating toxin that causes cells to release “exosomes” - there is something that can be studied - it is tiny and the structure is well documented...as well as the cascades that happen as it circulates in the body.
Personally, I don’t think it helps in a meaningful way to approach the work of scientists such as GVB as flawed or invalid because of germ theory. Germ theory still has the same hurdles and obstacles to jump over (if not more) to give a full explanation of what caused illness, (is it a germ or particulate matter, nanotech, emf, etc) how individuals and populations respond to the cause of said illness, (immunity and herd immunity) and how to explain that the small particle found in humans (exosome, nanotech, or viral) is changing over time. Virologist will look at this as immune response putting pressure on the virus to mutate. I’m not sure how germ theorists would explain the mutations. Not saying they don’t gave an explanation, but broadly I have only heard them state that the viral tests are all flawed so viruses are fiction. But that for me is a big problem - germ theory could be correct, and likely is in many regards, but on a quantitative level - how does it explain observable mutations in the small particles most call “viruses” that are observable?
For the time being, I prefer to read people like GVB who understand these tiny particles, their effects on the human body, and care less about what they name them until there is compelling evidence to do so.
What you are doing is defending the ego of the man, (that doesn't mean he has an ego) it's just the thing you're doing, the psychological thing that a lot of women do, I observe) So let's get our mind off that level and call him and everyone to give substance to what they say, let alone advise. There is no need to defend the man himself, I'm talking about why he doesn't mention AT ALL these questions many people have now about viruses. He doesn't even bring them up! Why the total silence? It reminds me so much of the silence over geoengineering or child pedophilia - they both have in common that they say nothing - I mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, about the subject that we're all buzzing about, you know, the people he says he cares about. He is an expert, so why doesn't he even allude to Bechamp who as I stated, was the real scientist of Louis Pasteur's time (LP was the "inventor" of germ theory) Yes there is so much more to the story so why is the same story only ever told? Don't you feel you should be more curious? It's not to downgrade the good doctor - it's to wake him up, like everyone else, we need to talk about everything that isn't talked about. Silence is the safeguard of scoundrels, just remember that. If speaking about obvious discrepancies gets attacked, then you're saying you give experts a pass. It can still be done cordially. But it doesn't have to because you can't be half-pregnant with free speech. What I am miffed about is that they NEVER mention, let alone address, these important holes in their theory. He doesn't address that other substances are added to the fake "isolation" of viruses. Knowing there are other substances in the sample, changes the truth of the results so that it is not "isolation", how could it be? Don't get tied up trying to defend the person's dignity. If we want to live in a world of truth, then every person's dignity must rest on honesty. I cannot understand how these "experts" have not heard of terrain theory or that they mention nothing about it if they have. It is ULTRA relevant. Think how many people could be healthier.
Just to clarify, as I think you have written it backwards, unless I misunderstood. Germ theory is the one that promotes 'viruses'. Terrain theory is the one that says 'viruses' don't exist.
It is extremely important whether these particles come from outside the body (virus) or inside the body (exosome - signaling particle). Why? Because the concept of 'virus' and 'viral contagion' is being used by our overlords and government to fearmonger and control the populace and inject into the populace whatever they see fit. Without 'viruses' that could no longer occur...
I have read Dr. Fleming’s book, GVB’s book, Dr. Thomas Cowan’s book (germ theory explanation applied to Covid) Karen Kingston’s substack on the whole pandemic stemming from nanotech synthetic biology, etc. As well as Turtle’s All the Way Down vaccine Science and Myth.
While germ theory is compelling in some regards, I have yet to find an author who can fully explain all aspects of what we observe in every day life with illness backed by proof the other way. For example, small particulate matter (air pollution) may be what is actually causing someone to be ill, but no one is measuring/studying it in a meaningful way that I can find to show how this could be the cause of respiratory illness vs a “virus”. At the end if the day, a lot of germ theory goes down the path of looking at exosomes (cell death debris) and saying that these particles are one and the same as a viral particle. So something caused cell to die, upon death it releases this exosome - germ theory says this is to warn other cells, viral theory says the particle is a virus and then it goes to other cells and causes more death. Both look at a tiny particle but interpret it very differently.
As with everything, it gets way more complicated, a lot of exosome research is fairly new and these small particles can act in many different ways, it’s not black and white at all.
Regardless, at some point, you have to look at a wider point of view and to me, “viral” or not, something small is being observed, a particle with spikes, and people like GVB seem to have a handle on how and why it mutates and changes over time, observing its changes over time. On the germ theory side, it seems just like everlasting cries of “viruses aren’t real.” Maybe they aren’t, but like Shakespeare famously wrote in Romeo and Juliet, “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” - whether a virus or a circulating toxin that causes cells to release “exosomes” - there is something that can be studied - it is tiny and the structure is well documented...as well as the cascades that happen as it circulates in the body.
Personally, I don’t think it helps in a meaningful way to approach the work of scientists such as GVB as flawed or invalid because of germ theory. Germ theory still has the same hurdles and obstacles to jump over (if not more) to give a full explanation of what caused illness, (is it a germ or particulate matter, nanotech, emf, etc) how individuals and populations respond to the cause of said illness, (immunity and herd immunity) and how to explain that the small particle found in humans (exosome, nanotech, or viral) is changing over time. Virologist will look at this as immune response putting pressure on the virus to mutate. I’m not sure how germ theorists would explain the mutations. Not saying they don’t gave an explanation, but broadly I have only heard them state that the viral tests are all flawed so viruses are fiction. But that for me is a big problem - germ theory could be correct, and likely is in many regards, but on a quantitative level - how does it explain observable mutations in the small particles most call “viruses” that are observable?
For the time being, I prefer to read people like GVB who understand these tiny particles, their effects on the human body, and care less about what they name them until there is compelling evidence to do so.
What you are doing is defending the ego of the man, (that doesn't mean he has an ego) it's just the thing you're doing, the psychological thing that a lot of women do, I observe) So let's get our mind off that level and call him and everyone to give substance to what they say, let alone advise. There is no need to defend the man himself, I'm talking about why he doesn't mention AT ALL these questions many people have now about viruses. He doesn't even bring them up! Why the total silence? It reminds me so much of the silence over geoengineering or child pedophilia - they both have in common that they say nothing - I mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, about the subject that we're all buzzing about, you know, the people he says he cares about. He is an expert, so why doesn't he even allude to Bechamp who as I stated, was the real scientist of Louis Pasteur's time (LP was the "inventor" of germ theory) Yes there is so much more to the story so why is the same story only ever told? Don't you feel you should be more curious? It's not to downgrade the good doctor - it's to wake him up, like everyone else, we need to talk about everything that isn't talked about. Silence is the safeguard of scoundrels, just remember that. If speaking about obvious discrepancies gets attacked, then you're saying you give experts a pass. It can still be done cordially. But it doesn't have to because you can't be half-pregnant with free speech. What I am miffed about is that they NEVER mention, let alone address, these important holes in their theory. He doesn't address that other substances are added to the fake "isolation" of viruses. Knowing there are other substances in the sample, changes the truth of the results so that it is not "isolation", how could it be? Don't get tied up trying to defend the person's dignity. If we want to live in a world of truth, then every person's dignity must rest on honesty. I cannot understand how these "experts" have not heard of terrain theory or that they mention nothing about it if they have. It is ULTRA relevant. Think how many people could be healthier.
Just to clarify, as I think you have written it backwards, unless I misunderstood. Germ theory is the one that promotes 'viruses'. Terrain theory is the one that says 'viruses' don't exist.
It is extremely important whether these particles come from outside the body (virus) or inside the body (exosome - signaling particle). Why? Because the concept of 'virus' and 'viral contagion' is being used by our overlords and government to fearmonger and control the populace and inject into the populace whatever they see fit. Without 'viruses' that could no longer occur...