About some unforgivable sins in vaccinology: Vaccination with a replicating-competent vaccine during the incubation time of a viral disease, or exposure to an infectious virus during the ‘incubation time’ of a vaccine-induced immune response...
I just saw on my MSN homepage that they 5-day quarantine for Covid in the U.S. is no longer required. Makes me think they are *wanting* people to get this next variant. I do wonder if the virulent variant will show as Covid when testing or something else? Everyone around me is sick with something horrible that "isn't Covid." Pneumonia, asthma, digestive problems, and of course, aggressive cancers that had no previous signs. My friend who is only 59 just got diagnosed with the aggressive prostate cancer that has no treatment other than removing it...found out at a routine doctor's visit and a PSA check. Another friend has multiple myeloma and tumors all over his body. The whites of his eyes are now yellow. This started in 2022 right after he lost his brother. Horrifying.
”On the other hand, when we vaccinate people with inactivated vaccines against a new respiratory virus they have never been infected by before, we stimulate a highly specific adaptive immune response, consisting mainly of B cells and T cells, rather than these NK cells. This is particularly true if we vaccinate them against one single protein (Spike). The damage is worst when it happens before their first infection.
This adaptive immune response will then be the first to start the fight whenever we are exposed to that particular virus again and further grow and take on a bigger role in the defense of our bodies with every new exposure to the virus. The innate immune response on the other hand, is forced to take a backseat ride.
The impact you would expect this to have, is that this highly specific adaptive immune response takes up more of the constrained immunological space your tissues have, at the cost of the more generalist innate immune response. This makes it comparatively difficult, for your body to fight off other respiratory pathogens that are not targeted by this adaptive immune response.”
Really? And what steps are needed to survive it when all around are blissfully ignorant? And anyone who brings it up is looked at with distaste or ridicule even by family members. I’ll take as much time to get prepared as I can get because there doesn’t appear to be a plan B. It every man for him/her self to figure it out as best we can. Are we now into the “survivalist” arena?
Thank you for that. It was a very clear and helpful for passing around to the uninitiated so that they can make informed decisions about next steps. Much appreciated.
What I would do if I were a world-class specialist in a narrow but wide-reaching area of medicine. I have noticed a continued trend of publishing misleading, false or non-scientific publications by #1 med publisher in the world. Their publications are obviously counter-scientific in the light of what we now consider to be the mainstream medicine. They do not bring anything new to the understanding of health processes, right on the contrary, they meddle waters and provide a pseudo-scientific education base for less knowledgeable colleagues.
Would I be silent? No. Being of enough renown, I would have established a new medical journal specifically addressing such false publications, offering a discussion forum for those who really have the good of the patients at heart. I know I am not alone, so probably several hundred fellow medical professionals would soon head the most important truly new medical journal in the world. All our publications would be free, and the peer-review process would be open, with the statement of the names of reviewers and public presentation of their review logic. Finally, the authors would be graded according to the usefulness of their research and observance of true scientific principles.
To counterbalance this modern falsification of medical publications, we would also make re-reviews of old papers, the ones which we all know were published in the form which should have never appeared. We would make monographic editions dedicated to special cases, offering ample room for true scientific discussion. Our Issue #1 in this series would be a modest 300-pages focus on the Wakefield story, which (still) is unquestionably the loudest case of twisting the science against the patients ever.
That's quite a vision! Reality might intercede, however. One example: Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist, was forced to "retire" - ten years early - b/c TPTB coerced his insurance company into dropping him. No insurance = no practice.
If a teenager with a $10 camera can build a blog empire from a home “office”, respected professional medicine experts with thousands of references, a lifetime’s worth of publications and financial resources beyond the imagination of an average citizen sure can start a valuable publication, right? So many of them are repeatedly voicing concerns how unfair the covid measures are, how the SC2 science has more blunders than truth. So that’s not a vision, it’s just a logical follow-up to these continued concerns over matters not resolved in the fifth year of medical science which goes against medical science.
My triple Pfizer vaxed husband is constantly sick with mysterious, horrible health problems. It's incredibly depressing to watch. He refuses to admit the truth to himself.
I'm sorry to hear that~~I can't imagine living intimately with someone who thought being vaccinated was a good idea. Have you noticed any shedding side effects for yourself?
For example, if 10,000 people were vaccinated in a clinical trial and 10,000 people were not vaccinated, 100 people who were not vaccinated would develop symptoms.
If 0 vaccinated people do not develop symptoms, the relative effectiveness rate according to health authorities and epidemiologists = (100-0)/100 = 100%.
The absolute effectiveness rate is (1-(1-100/10000))/(1-0/10000)=1%
It is, in short, 9,900 people would not have been infected even without vaccination.
Even with this pseudo-mRNA vaccination, the efficacy rate stated by Pfizer and the FDA was a relative efficacy rate for advertising purposes and was intended to intentionally mislead the public.
Papers written by epidemiologists intentionally never use absolute efficacy rates.
Hey Geert -- perhaps you can address this question... a leaky vaccine resulted in an incredibly deadly and highly contagious mutation involving chickens.
With respect to Covid 19... there is no inadvertence... rather there is intent to deploy leaky vaccines repeatedly in what appears to be an attempt to conjure up a deadly highly contagious mutation of Covid 19... inevitably that will be the result.
The hot strains of Marek's killed all the unvaccinated chickens. Would not the hot strain of Covid 19 kill all unvaccinated humans?
And because the Covid vaccines are formulated for the original strain of Covid... would not all the vaccinated be considered unvaccinated.. and die as well?
The deadliest strains of viruses often take care of themselves — they flare up and then die out. This is because they are so good at destroying cells and causing illness that they ultimately kill their host before they have time to spread.
But a chicken virus that represents one of the deadliest germs in history breaks from this conventional wisdom, thanks to an inadvertent effect from a vaccine. Chickens vaccinated against Marek’s disease rarely get sick. But the vaccine does not prevent them from spreading Marek’s to unvaccinated birds.
“With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. There is no human virus that is that hot. Ebola, for example, doesn’t kill everything in 10 days.”
In fact, rather than stop fowl from spreading the virus, the vaccine allows the disease to spread faster and longer than it normally would, a new study finds. The scientists now believe that this vaccine has helped this chicken virus become uniquely virulent. (Note: it only harms fowl). The study was published on Monday in the journal PLOS Biology.
This is the first time that this virus-boosting phenomenon, known as the imperfect vaccine hypothesis, has been observed experimentally.
The reason this is a problem for Marek’s disease is because the vaccine is “leaky.” A leaky vaccine is one that keeps a microbe from doing serious harm to its host, but doesn’t stop the disease from replicating and spreading to another individual. On the other hand, a “perfect” vaccine is one that sets up lifelong immunity that never wanes and blocks both infection and transmission.
It’s important to note childhood vaccines for polio, measles, mumps, rubella and smallpox aren’t leaky; they are considered “perfect” vaccines. As such, they are in no way in danger of falling prey to this phenomenon.
But the results do raise the questions for some human vaccines that are leaky – such as malaria, and other agricultural vaccines, such as the one being used against avian influenza, or bird flu.
Marek’s disease has plagued the chicken industry, it causes $2 billion in losses annually for fowl farmers across the globe. The virus attacks the brain, spawns tumors in the birds and comes in different varieties or “strains”, which are classified as “hot” or “cold” based on their brutality.
Andrew Read, who co-led the study, had heard about the severe effects of the hottest Marek’s strains before his lab started studying the disease about a decade ago, but even he was surprised when he finally saw the virus in action.
“With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. There is no human virus that is that hot. Ebola, for example, doesn’t kill everything in 10 days,” said Read, who is an evolutionary biologist at Penn State University.
Apologies for being off-topic, but can anyone address vaccine shedding? I’m intellectually curious: is it possible? how does it occur? are there any countermeasures or precautions an unvaccinated person can take?
I suggest looking at the "problem" differently: Have you optimized your immune system support regimen? Vitamins A B C D E - especially D3 (I take 10,000 daily) - are critical. Ignore RDAs - and your doctor's "recommendations" - which can be ridiculously low. Include herbs known to have anti-inflammatory / antioxidant / anti-viral properties. There are several; I take curcumin, quercetin w/ bromelain and trans-resveratrol. Magnesium, of which there are several types, is a must; I take mg-malate morning and evening, mg-glycinate at bedtime for leg cramps and mg-L-threonate for sleep. A trace mineral supplement is also a must. In the last year, I've added: NAC, elderberry and carnitine. Do not skimp! Do the research! Pay attention to your body!
No, no concerns. My target range is 75 to 100 ng/ mL. I had a blood serum level >100 ng/mL once - and was worried - but I dropped my daily intake a bit, had it checked again three months later, and it was below 90 ng/mL. I think doctors are required to abide by certain protocols that may or may not be based on actual studies. I've only found one number in the literature: "Toxicity begins at 150 ng/mL." And that's someone's best guess.
The principle is the same; focus on immune system support. Shedding appears to be a threat to a subset of people who are especially sensitive to it. [Dr. Pierre Kory] I'm concerned about it, too. FLCCC is a wonderful resource!
Vaccinology, like virology as a whole, is pseudoscientific quackery. Germ Theory is completely untenable at this stage. Electromagnetic pollution is an immeasurably-greater threat than any imaginary cooties. Godspeed.
So in other words dropping a hand grenade (vaccine) into someone likely just infected with a new virus likely overwhelms their immune system? Who would have known?
Why people are now constantly sick all the time.
https://www.rintrah.nl/why-people-are-now-constantly-sick-all-the-time/
Dr Vanden Bossche, this is in line with your theory.
I just saw on my MSN homepage that they 5-day quarantine for Covid in the U.S. is no longer required. Makes me think they are *wanting* people to get this next variant. I do wonder if the virulent variant will show as Covid when testing or something else? Everyone around me is sick with something horrible that "isn't Covid." Pneumonia, asthma, digestive problems, and of course, aggressive cancers that had no previous signs. My friend who is only 59 just got diagnosed with the aggressive prostate cancer that has no treatment other than removing it...found out at a routine doctor's visit and a PSA check. Another friend has multiple myeloma and tumors all over his body. The whites of his eyes are now yellow. This started in 2022 right after he lost his brother. Horrifying.
From the blog post:
”On the other hand, when we vaccinate people with inactivated vaccines against a new respiratory virus they have never been infected by before, we stimulate a highly specific adaptive immune response, consisting mainly of B cells and T cells, rather than these NK cells. This is particularly true if we vaccinate them against one single protein (Spike). The damage is worst when it happens before their first infection.
This adaptive immune response will then be the first to start the fight whenever we are exposed to that particular virus again and further grow and take on a bigger role in the defense of our bodies with every new exposure to the virus. The innate immune response on the other hand, is forced to take a backseat ride.
The impact you would expect this to have, is that this highly specific adaptive immune response takes up more of the constrained immunological space your tissues have, at the cost of the more generalist innate immune response. This makes it comparatively difficult, for your body to fight off other respiratory pathogens that are not targeted by this adaptive immune response.”
Seems like a common theme. A lot of people are just sick all the time.
Yes, Mr “Data Report” on YouTube brought that up yesterday.
That was a good read and easy to understand.
The author's conclusion is that in the next few weeks we will see a very sharp increase in severe covid in highly vaccinated countries.
If it is inevitable, then it should happen now. The waiting is getting on my nerves.
Really? And what steps are needed to survive it when all around are blissfully ignorant? And anyone who brings it up is looked at with distaste or ridicule even by family members. I’ll take as much time to get prepared as I can get because there doesn’t appear to be a plan B. It every man for him/her self to figure it out as best we can. Are we now into the “survivalist” arena?
Thank you for that. It was a very clear and helpful for passing around to the uninitiated so that they can make informed decisions about next steps. Much appreciated.
.
It Turns Out
That Doctors Of Medicine
Are The Tin Foil Lunatics.
.
What I would do if I were a world-class specialist in a narrow but wide-reaching area of medicine. I have noticed a continued trend of publishing misleading, false or non-scientific publications by #1 med publisher in the world. Their publications are obviously counter-scientific in the light of what we now consider to be the mainstream medicine. They do not bring anything new to the understanding of health processes, right on the contrary, they meddle waters and provide a pseudo-scientific education base for less knowledgeable colleagues.
Would I be silent? No. Being of enough renown, I would have established a new medical journal specifically addressing such false publications, offering a discussion forum for those who really have the good of the patients at heart. I know I am not alone, so probably several hundred fellow medical professionals would soon head the most important truly new medical journal in the world. All our publications would be free, and the peer-review process would be open, with the statement of the names of reviewers and public presentation of their review logic. Finally, the authors would be graded according to the usefulness of their research and observance of true scientific principles.
To counterbalance this modern falsification of medical publications, we would also make re-reviews of old papers, the ones which we all know were published in the form which should have never appeared. We would make monographic editions dedicated to special cases, offering ample room for true scientific discussion. Our Issue #1 in this series would be a modest 300-pages focus on the Wakefield story, which (still) is unquestionably the loudest case of twisting the science against the patients ever.
If I win the lottery, I’ll put a chunk of gold into realizing this beautiful vision.
That's quite a vision! Reality might intercede, however. One example: Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist, was forced to "retire" - ten years early - b/c TPTB coerced his insurance company into dropping him. No insurance = no practice.
If a teenager with a $10 camera can build a blog empire from a home “office”, respected professional medicine experts with thousands of references, a lifetime’s worth of publications and financial resources beyond the imagination of an average citizen sure can start a valuable publication, right? So many of them are repeatedly voicing concerns how unfair the covid measures are, how the SC2 science has more blunders than truth. So that’s not a vision, it’s just a logical follow-up to these continued concerns over matters not resolved in the fifth year of medical science which goes against medical science.
Thanks for Sharing such a Timely update Dr Bossche much appreciated 🙏
My triple Pfizer vaxed husband is constantly sick with mysterious, horrible health problems. It's incredibly depressing to watch. He refuses to admit the truth to himself.
I'm sorry to hear that~~I can't imagine living intimately with someone who thought being vaccinated was a good idea. Have you noticed any shedding side effects for yourself?
It's almost as though the complexities of the human immune systems are beyod our understanding.
The same seems to be true of virus, transmission of same and the spread of "disease".
For example, if 10,000 people were vaccinated in a clinical trial and 10,000 people were not vaccinated, 100 people who were not vaccinated would develop symptoms.
If 0 vaccinated people do not develop symptoms, the relative effectiveness rate according to health authorities and epidemiologists = (100-0)/100 = 100%.
The absolute effectiveness rate is (1-(1-100/10000))/(1-0/10000)=1%
It is, in short, 9,900 people would not have been infected even without vaccination.
Even with this pseudo-mRNA vaccination, the efficacy rate stated by Pfizer and the FDA was a relative efficacy rate for advertising purposes and was intended to intentionally mislead the public.
Papers written by epidemiologists intentionally never use absolute efficacy rates.
I hate epidemiologists.
Hey Geert -- perhaps you can address this question... a leaky vaccine resulted in an incredibly deadly and highly contagious mutation involving chickens.
With respect to Covid 19... there is no inadvertence... rather there is intent to deploy leaky vaccines repeatedly in what appears to be an attempt to conjure up a deadly highly contagious mutation of Covid 19... inevitably that will be the result.
The hot strains of Marek's killed all the unvaccinated chickens. Would not the hot strain of Covid 19 kill all unvaccinated humans?
And because the Covid vaccines are formulated for the original strain of Covid... would not all the vaccinated be considered unvaccinated.. and die as well?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous
The deadliest strains of viruses often take care of themselves — they flare up and then die out. This is because they are so good at destroying cells and causing illness that they ultimately kill their host before they have time to spread.
But a chicken virus that represents one of the deadliest germs in history breaks from this conventional wisdom, thanks to an inadvertent effect from a vaccine. Chickens vaccinated against Marek’s disease rarely get sick. But the vaccine does not prevent them from spreading Marek’s to unvaccinated birds.
“With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. There is no human virus that is that hot. Ebola, for example, doesn’t kill everything in 10 days.”
In fact, rather than stop fowl from spreading the virus, the vaccine allows the disease to spread faster and longer than it normally would, a new study finds. The scientists now believe that this vaccine has helped this chicken virus become uniquely virulent. (Note: it only harms fowl). The study was published on Monday in the journal PLOS Biology.
This is the first time that this virus-boosting phenomenon, known as the imperfect vaccine hypothesis, has been observed experimentally.
The reason this is a problem for Marek’s disease is because the vaccine is “leaky.” A leaky vaccine is one that keeps a microbe from doing serious harm to its host, but doesn’t stop the disease from replicating and spreading to another individual. On the other hand, a “perfect” vaccine is one that sets up lifelong immunity that never wanes and blocks both infection and transmission.
It’s important to note childhood vaccines for polio, measles, mumps, rubella and smallpox aren’t leaky; they are considered “perfect” vaccines. As such, they are in no way in danger of falling prey to this phenomenon.
But the results do raise the questions for some human vaccines that are leaky – such as malaria, and other agricultural vaccines, such as the one being used against avian influenza, or bird flu.
Marek’s disease has plagued the chicken industry, it causes $2 billion in losses annually for fowl farmers across the globe. The virus attacks the brain, spawns tumors in the birds and comes in different varieties or “strains”, which are classified as “hot” or “cold” based on their brutality.
Andrew Read, who co-led the study, had heard about the severe effects of the hottest Marek’s strains before his lab started studying the disease about a decade ago, but even he was surprised when he finally saw the virus in action.
“With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. There is no human virus that is that hot. Ebola, for example, doesn’t kill everything in 10 days,” said Read, who is an evolutionary biologist at Penn State University.
Apologies for being off-topic, but can anyone address vaccine shedding? I’m intellectually curious: is it possible? how does it occur? are there any countermeasures or precautions an unvaccinated person can take?
Thank you and thank you, Doc.
I suggest looking at the "problem" differently: Have you optimized your immune system support regimen? Vitamins A B C D E - especially D3 (I take 10,000 daily) - are critical. Ignore RDAs - and your doctor's "recommendations" - which can be ridiculously low. Include herbs known to have anti-inflammatory / antioxidant / anti-viral properties. There are several; I take curcumin, quercetin w/ bromelain and trans-resveratrol. Magnesium, of which there are several types, is a must; I take mg-malate morning and evening, mg-glycinate at bedtime for leg cramps and mg-L-threonate for sleep. A trace mineral supplement is also a must. In the last year, I've added: NAC, elderberry and carnitine. Do not skimp! Do the research! Pay attention to your body!
Diet is huge also.
Just had my vitamin d checked. Is at 109 and they said it was to high?? Any thoughts?
No, no concerns. My target range is 75 to 100 ng/ mL. I had a blood serum level >100 ng/mL once - and was worried - but I dropped my daily intake a bit, had it checked again three months later, and it was below 90 ng/mL. I think doctors are required to abide by certain protocols that may or may not be based on actual studies. I've only found one number in the literature: "Toxicity begins at 150 ng/mL." And that's someone's best guess.
Both Pierre Kory and A Midwestern Doctor have written substacks about shedding.
That’s great info, thank you, I’ll check it out. Fascinated by this topic.
Search in this substack: https://substack.com/@amidwesterndoctor
There is a prevention protocol on the FLCCC website. https://covid19criticalcare.com/protocol/i-prevent-covid-flu-rsv/
it includes ivermectin along with the other vitamins and supplements
The principle is the same; focus on immune system support. Shedding appears to be a threat to a subset of people who are especially sensitive to it. [Dr. Pierre Kory] I'm concerned about it, too. FLCCC is a wonderful resource!
Vaccinology, like virology as a whole, is pseudoscientific quackery. Germ Theory is completely untenable at this stage. Electromagnetic pollution is an immeasurably-greater threat than any imaginary cooties. Godspeed.
Great info, thank you! Yes, my daily intake of vitamins & supplements is not as robust as yours and I kindly thank you for your suggestions.
I’m not worried about vax shedding, just intellectually curious as to the mechanism / process, etc.
Thanks again, RightThink!
I even noticed the published 100% efficacy for the ebola vaccine and thought "wtf"?
Organizations that purport to help are only helping themselves financially. They don't help the people.
So in other words dropping a hand grenade (vaccine) into someone likely just infected with a new virus likely overwhelms their immune system? Who would have known?