1. Lancet Report Claiming COVID Could Have Come from U.S. Lab Met With Uproar “A top medical journal at the heart of several pandemic-related controversies published a major COVID-19 Commission report Wednesday that concluded the deadly pathogen might possibly have leaked from a United States laboratory.”
Most of the bird flu "cases" are from pcr test determination because of mandatory "testing" of flocks. The same agenda is at work as the CDC pcr tests which had a 90%+ false positive rate! The bird raisers know instantly if there is bird flu in their flocks - they don't need any stinking pcr tests - they just have to look at their flocks! The symptoms are damn obvious to the raiser! Too many times after the asymptomatic +pcr test, flocks are presumptively slaughtered, necropsy and proper serology shows no bird flu evidence, and the owners can't say so!
"... with relatively preserved protection against severe disease in triple-vaccinated individuals.”
Here's that statement again. UK HSA/ONS data does NOT support that claim. What data is being used to continue to support this claim? Perhaps it is the low rate of severe infection in both the unvaccinated AND vaccinated which is being mistaken for a "vaccine" effect?
I have been following the theories since the day it became obvious Covid was going to spread worldwide. Based on numerous reports, sewerage testing & China’s own reactions the Wuhan military games looks like the most viable option, Italy, Canada, Iran ( one died from their infection) USA all reported a number of people suffering from a respiratory infection . American money definitely went to their Wuhan lab but it didn’t leak from America’s labs, or their would be more evidence of sickness & it would have spread to STH America much more quickly. China also did a mock run of a pandemic before the games shutting down the airport in Wuhan, yet when they knew there was an outbreak they didn’t bother. They have done too many things that an innocent party would not do. China is definitely the leak.
> Lancet Report Claiming COVID Could Have Come from U.S. Lab Met With Uproar
This is just a theory, a possibilty, and opinion. When you have uproar about just a theory that's how you know you are dealing with close-minded people.
Hindsight the Alpha and Beta variants really weren’t that infectious—although they seemed like a lot of infections at the time—compared with how easily omicron, and delta before it, spread.
they’re able to avoid or to evade the pre-existing immunity, either from vaccine or from previous infection, that was based on a previous variant.” All existing covid-19 vaccines are based on the original “wild-type” strain.
I have been grappling with the biology behind the idea that numerous doses of this ´vaccine’ don’t stop transmission or infection but still seems to offer some protection against hospitalisation and death. Can anyone explain to me the mechanism? Is this notion still true - it seems to be quoted often but as I’ve become so cynical about everything, I no longer know what to believe. It appears to be the only thing saving the vaccine from
being completely useless (and probably harmful) in the majority of the population and I wonder if at this stage it is just more propaganda .
I have now understood that Geert is a shill. How many substacks have you seen where the author will never talk himself, only write to but never communicate with his "public"?
I haven't seen any. I asked him to show me the experiment which lets him know that any pathogenic virus exists. I've looked for it and can't find it. I see the 1954 Nobel Prize having gone to a guy who ran an experiment which he himself said "the same thing happened in the control, that will need to be looked into." This means that there was no control and therefore no successful experiment. This failed experiment gave a result that the then much younger New World Order wanted to hear. It gave them the ability to make everybody on the planet believe that there are pathogenic virus particles. There aren't. If you think there are, please show us all the clever experiment which has demonstrated this to be a fact. Surely it exists, but if it does, how do we explain that either Geert doesn't know about it or doesn't want to talk about it. Meanwhile he has sent (I'm assuming Geert sent him because Geert has remained silent regarding my legitimate question) his attack dog who has tried to keep me out of the main thread. Well I got tired of talking to him, or should I say listening to him. He's rude and he calls me a troll for asking a question and insisting when it's not been answered.
So I ask anybody reading this, does wanting the answer to my question make me a troll?
Have any of you fallen onto a scientific experiment which has been done and which can and has been repeated which makes it clear that there is no other alternative to explain the observations than that tiny lifeless particles with no energy to spend breach our cells' membranes and then breach our cells' nuclei's membranes and reprogram our cells and use them to make copies of their inanimate arses?
I haven't found it, but I found this Nobel prize of John F. Enders. I don't think Enders was a fraud. He ran an experiment and was probably quite surprised to hear it "earned" him a nobel prize. They just used him like they use everybody. And they, through Geert, want to use us again.
Insist on the truth. Be suspicious when somebody tells you you're spreading misinformation. That's what Geert's attack dog who calls himiself Guido Vandeven has told me I'm doing.
I'm not spreading misinformation, I'm asking a question. I don't think guido is lying, I think he's just brainwashed by whoever is using Geert's identity. I"m going to try to learn more about Geert. He's behaving strangely. Even Steve Kirsch still will engage me and we've been having the same discussion. He speaks of pathogenic virus as though there's no doubt and I tell him I can't find proof and would he show me his proof. Same thing, they don't want to talk about it. But after challenging people who didn't want to do a video with him, he did another interview with a guy with similar opinions to mine. The guy wiped the floor with Kirsch. If anybody wants a link to that, I'll share it.
VSS Scientific Updates During Pandemic Times #38
Most of the bird flu "cases" are from pcr test determination because of mandatory "testing" of flocks. The same agenda is at work as the CDC pcr tests which had a 90%+ false positive rate! The bird raisers know instantly if there is bird flu in their flocks - they don't need any stinking pcr tests - they just have to look at their flocks! The symptoms are damn obvious to the raiser! Too many times after the asymptomatic +pcr test, flocks are presumptively slaughtered, necropsy and proper serology shows no bird flu evidence, and the owners can't say so!
Dr. Vanden Bossche,
Please comment on the latest Substack posting of Dr. Eric Topol at https://erictopol.substack.com/p/to-boost-or-not-to-boost
Thanks so much for your great, great work. I'm not qualified to judge the science, for the most part, but your humanity is stellar to me.
"... with relatively preserved protection against severe disease in triple-vaccinated individuals.”
Here's that statement again. UK HSA/ONS data does NOT support that claim. What data is being used to continue to support this claim? Perhaps it is the low rate of severe infection in both the unvaccinated AND vaccinated which is being mistaken for a "vaccine" effect?
I have been following the theories since the day it became obvious Covid was going to spread worldwide. Based on numerous reports, sewerage testing & China’s own reactions the Wuhan military games looks like the most viable option, Italy, Canada, Iran ( one died from their infection) USA all reported a number of people suffering from a respiratory infection . American money definitely went to their Wuhan lab but it didn’t leak from America’s labs, or their would be more evidence of sickness & it would have spread to STH America much more quickly. China also did a mock run of a pandemic before the games shutting down the airport in Wuhan, yet when they knew there was an outbreak they didn’t bother. They have done too many things that an innocent party would not do. China is definitely the leak.
You're right. Facts matter！ If we do our best to look for it, we will find many bad facts already.
DR.G.V.Bossche's theoretical explanation leads to facts in the near future ,I think.
> Lancet Report Claiming COVID Could Have Come from U.S. Lab Met With Uproar
This is just a theory, a possibilty, and opinion. When you have uproar about just a theory that's how you know you are dealing with close-minded people.
Lies from MSM and biased medical journals continue. Thanks for the awareness GVB.
Hindsight the Alpha and Beta variants really weren’t that infectious—although they seemed like a lot of infections at the time—compared with how easily omicron, and delta before it, spread.
DR.G.V.Bossche's theory is difficult for laymen.
Concepts such as differential immunity, for example, are not found in any immunology textbook.
His easy-to-understand explanations like yours are very convincing and helpful to laymen. Thank you.
they’re able to avoid or to evade the pre-existing immunity, either from vaccine or from previous infection, that was based on a previous variant.” All existing covid-19 vaccines are based on the original “wild-type” strain.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.16.508299v1
I have been grappling with the biology behind the idea that numerous doses of this ´vaccine’ don’t stop transmission or infection but still seems to offer some protection against hospitalisation and death. Can anyone explain to me the mechanism? Is this notion still true - it seems to be quoted often but as I’ve become so cynical about everything, I no longer know what to believe. It appears to be the only thing saving the vaccine from
being completely useless (and probably harmful) in the majority of the population and I wonder if at this stage it is just more propaganda .
Good morning Geert thanks for this once again timely informations much appreciated and straight to the point
Shouldnt those workers be wearing goggles? I thought the flu virus can also infect via the mucus membrane of the eyes...
Poor critters! VICTIMS OF MANMEAN! Well, sure the COVID-19
virus (and very likely OTHERS) come from U.S. labs. Why not if
Dr. Mengelefauci was/is involved with BOTH! STOP THE MURDER!
SURVIVE AND STAY WELL NATURALLY! I post publicly and freely on MeWe.
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH'S SAINTS!
I have now understood that Geert is a shill. How many substacks have you seen where the author will never talk himself, only write to but never communicate with his "public"?
I haven't seen any. I asked him to show me the experiment which lets him know that any pathogenic virus exists. I've looked for it and can't find it. I see the 1954 Nobel Prize having gone to a guy who ran an experiment which he himself said "the same thing happened in the control, that will need to be looked into." This means that there was no control and therefore no successful experiment. This failed experiment gave a result that the then much younger New World Order wanted to hear. It gave them the ability to make everybody on the planet believe that there are pathogenic virus particles. There aren't. If you think there are, please show us all the clever experiment which has demonstrated this to be a fact. Surely it exists, but if it does, how do we explain that either Geert doesn't know about it or doesn't want to talk about it. Meanwhile he has sent (I'm assuming Geert sent him because Geert has remained silent regarding my legitimate question) his attack dog who has tried to keep me out of the main thread. Well I got tired of talking to him, or should I say listening to him. He's rude and he calls me a troll for asking a question and insisting when it's not been answered.
So I ask anybody reading this, does wanting the answer to my question make me a troll?
Have any of you fallen onto a scientific experiment which has been done and which can and has been repeated which makes it clear that there is no other alternative to explain the observations than that tiny lifeless particles with no energy to spend breach our cells' membranes and then breach our cells' nuclei's membranes and reprogram our cells and use them to make copies of their inanimate arses?
I haven't found it, but I found this Nobel prize of John F. Enders. I don't think Enders was a fraud. He ran an experiment and was probably quite surprised to hear it "earned" him a nobel prize. They just used him like they use everybody. And they, through Geert, want to use us again.
Insist on the truth. Be suspicious when somebody tells you you're spreading misinformation. That's what Geert's attack dog who calls himiself Guido Vandeven has told me I'm doing.
I'm not spreading misinformation, I'm asking a question. I don't think guido is lying, I think he's just brainwashed by whoever is using Geert's identity. I"m going to try to learn more about Geert. He's behaving strangely. Even Steve Kirsch still will engage me and we've been having the same discussion. He speaks of pathogenic virus as though there's no doubt and I tell him I can't find proof and would he show me his proof. Same thing, they don't want to talk about it. But after challenging people who didn't want to do a video with him, he did another interview with a guy with similar opinions to mine. The guy wiped the floor with Kirsch. If anybody wants a link to that, I'll share it.