Most of the bird flu "cases" are from pcr test determination because of mandatory "testing" of flocks. The same agenda is at work as the CDC pcr tests which had a 90%+ false positive rate! The bird raisers know instantly if there is bird flu in their flocks - they don't need any stinking pcr tests - they just have to look at their flocks! The symptoms are damn obvious to the raiser! Too many times after the asymptomatic +pcr test, flocks are presumptively slaughtered, necropsy and proper serology shows no bird flu evidence, and the owners can't say so!
There is no solid proof for any virus or real DNA, so what are they even testing for?
It's stupid "medical" theatre and a waste of resources for no good reason; not that I eat any poultry any more, because of the frequent use of factory farms, drugs, and unhealthy feed which result in unhealthy meat.
"Pfizer was responsible for the design and conduct of the trial; for the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and for the writing of the manuscript."
No greater conflict of interest could be imagined. And as the company has already been served billions of dollars in penalties for malfeasance, It can be considered fruit of the poison tree and dismissed on that basis alone.
From what I have read/researched, the primary response to a coronavirus is cellular (nk cells, innate antibodies and Tcells) NOT humoral (adaptive B cell antibodies). Immune memory through natural infection is developed based on a broad selection of first expressed proteins during an infection and a subsequent linked recognition of these through multiple pathways (Tcells coordinating with Bcells etc..). These functionally conserved proteins are not the spike.
The mRNA transfections do no replicate this type of immune memory development.
Adaptive antibodies are the LAST thing the body develops for a mucosal respiratory infection. This has been known for ages. If folks like Topol don't know this, they're incompetent. If they do, they're not saying it and they're being deliberately deceptive.
i have never heard of topol before, i have not read the entirety of the post you point towards, yet i can tell you from the little i have read that topol most probably is on the paylist of pfizer et al.
if one takes a publication that is paid for by pfizer and takes it for fact one is either very stupid or bought and paid for.
they’re able to avoid or to evade the pre-existing immunity, either from vaccine or from previous infection, that was based on a previous variant.” All existing covid-19 vaccines are based on the original “wild-type” strain.
"... with relatively preserved protection against severe disease in triple-vaccinated individuals.”
Here's that statement again. UK HSA/ONS data does NOT support that claim. What data is being used to continue to support this claim? Perhaps it is the low rate of severe infection in both the unvaccinated AND vaccinated which is being mistaken for a "vaccine" effect?
I have been following the theories since the day it became obvious Covid was going to spread worldwide. Based on numerous reports, sewerage testing & China’s own reactions the Wuhan military games looks like the most viable option, Italy, Canada, Iran ( one died from their infection) USA all reported a number of people suffering from a respiratory infection . American money definitely went to their Wuhan lab but it didn’t leak from America’s labs, or their would be more evidence of sickness & it would have spread to STH America much more quickly. China also did a mock run of a pandemic before the games shutting down the airport in Wuhan, yet when they knew there was an outbreak they didn’t bother. They have done too many things that an innocent party would not do. China is definitely the leak.
> Lancet Report Claiming COVID Could Have Come from U.S. Lab Met With Uproar
This is just a theory, a possibilty, and opinion. When you have uproar about just a theory that's how you know you are dealing with close-minded people.
Hindsight the Alpha and Beta variants really weren’t that infectious—although they seemed like a lot of infections at the time—compared with how easily omicron, and delta before it, spread.
they’re able to avoid or to evade the pre-existing immunity, either from vaccine or from previous infection, that was based on a previous variant.” All existing covid-19 vaccines are based on the original “wild-type” strain.
I have been grappling with the biology behind the idea that numerous doses of this ´vaccine’ don’t stop transmission or infection but still seems to offer some protection against hospitalisation and death. Can anyone explain to me the mechanism? Is this notion still true - it seems to be quoted often but as I’ve become so cynical about everything, I no longer know what to believe. It appears to be the only thing saving the vaccine from
being completely useless (and probably harmful) in the majority of the population and I wonder if at this stage it is just more propaganda .
It isn't true that the more vaxxed you are, the better the chance of escaping severe disease/hospitalization. If you take a look at the NSW Australia data base, in the link below you will see that the more vaxxed, the greater the probability of winding up in the hospital.
Yes you're right, the data doesn't really support that claim. Maybe Geert means that without that transinfection inhibiting effect from the vaccinal antibodies, vaccinees would be completeley vulnerable to ADED, therefore there is still some protection compared to the worst case scenario xD
I agree. I think it's a lie, just like "covid STOPS with each shotted person." If that were the case, why are so many shotted persons ending up in the hospital and dying? There should be NO shotted persons in the hospital at all.
Check out Dr. Vanden Bossche's papers on his website on the evolution of the virus. If I remember correctly, he describes how the same antibodies from the vaccines (which enhance infection in the upper respiratory tract) prevent the virus (which later migrates on certain type of cells from the upper respiratory tract to the the lower tract and other organs) from infecting other cells in those organs (e.g. the lung). Thereby severe disease is prevented since these organs are still protected from infection.
Additionally, this virulence-inhibiting effect buys time for killer T-cells to eliminate the virus in vaccinees (but not prevent infection). If frequently infected, T-cell hyperactivation would occur, which would eliminate infected cells more and more rapidly after infection and drastically reduce even mild symptoms of covid, while still not protecting against infection. This would explain why it currently seems like the pandemic is over with low hospitalizations and very mild (or even asymptomatic?) infections in vaccinees.
Finally, he also argues that T-cell hyperactivation in covid-19 vaccinees also protects the. from symptomatic disease from other certain glycosylated viruses, e.g. monkeypox, various types of flu. Since T cells don't prevent infection, people with mild or no symptoms of these diseases would spread them more without noticing, explaining these other current pandemics (asymptomatic spread). T-cell depletion is also a problem if this hyperactivation is really starting to occur in vaccinees.
That's his explanation at least of the current state of the pandemic as far as I remember.
I believe GVB says the non-neutralizing antibodies which promote infection are the very same ones that prevent trans-infection in the lung when they are transferred down there by being tethered to the dendritic cells in the upper respiratory system (as dendritic cells are known to do ((migrate)).
Once that “protection” of the lung is overcome by evolution, there is no longer protection from severe disease and death. The dreaded full-on antibody dependent enhancement of disease ADED will be in play.
You can also look up his interviews from like 3-4 months ago were he basically just explains these papers to lay audiences, e.g. at the Highwire with Del Bigtree (I think it's called "The Vanden Bossche warning" from May 2022).
When I go to a doctor's office or other places where I am close to others, I take Ivermectin at dinner the day before according to the above preventive protocol.
I personally imported it from India. In Japan, not available to amateurs.
Side effects are very rare to begin with, and even if they occur, they are mild, so you can rest assured.
I have blood tests for other diseases every 3 months,
There are no abnormalities in the numerical values, and no subjective abnormalities caused by Ivermectin.
I understand all the negative mechanisms of this vaccine. I think it is an atrocious intervention but you misunderstand my point.
I want to know how they are trying to justify the protection against serious ill and death - I am not saying that this jab does protect against anything - but unless I understand their justification (however wrong it is), I cannot offer any contradiction because I don’t what I am trying to contradict.
I had many arguments with my husband before he took a jab and told him that it wouldn’t protect him from infection and that he could pass it on to me (this is back in August 21) and, what do you know, he got covid this year and passed it on to me. But he argued that it would stop him getting seriously ill and dying. How can I argue against this because I don’t know upon which basis this is being argued so I cannot offer a counter-argument.
Dr. Vanden Bossche says that this protection against serious illness/death is there in this Substack and I am simply asking for the biological mechanism because I find it very hard to understand how something that doesn’t stop you getting a disease can offer any protection.
I truly do not need any convincing that this medical procedure is very bad news.
I graduated from the engineering department of one of Japan's top universities.
My wife is a veterinary graduate and she questioned mRNA vaccines in the early days of the pandemic.
So I started studying.
I studied the basics of immunology.
But Dr. Geert Vabden Bosshe's explanation is difficult for me, and I do not understand the details.
To really understand him, I think I need to study immunology and virology for two or three years.
What I can do for myself (I'm already past middle age) is to tell my relatives and friends about the dangers of mRNA vaccines and where to find information(Easy to understand even for amateurs) so that they can stay healthy.
At the moment, because of the emergence of the Omicron variant, non-neutralising antibodies that were induced by COVID vaccination have the upper hand in binding to the virus. It has been shown that when non-neutralising antibodies bind to the virus, they cause structural changes that enhance attachment of the virus to human ACE2 receptors. Cells in the upper respiratory tract are rich in ACE2 receptors while cells in the lower respiratory tract are not.
Infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions can attach themselves to dendritic cells in the upper respiratory tract. These dendritic cells bring the virus down to the lower respiratory tract where through the processes of trans-infection and trans-fusion (see Dr GVB's paper dated 9 May 2022 for definitions), the virus can now infect and cause severe disease in the lower respiratory tract. However, the same non-neutralising antibodies mentioned above will prevent the processes of trans-infection and trans-fusion and thereby prevent severe disease and death.
The really important point, though, is that the above prevention of severe disease and death by the non-neutralising antibodies is only temporary. This is because the virus is not standing still in the face of the pressure exerted by these non-neutralising antibodies. The virus will continually try to escape from such immune pressure, eventually becoming more virulent as a result. At that stage, the virus will break through the adaptive immune system of both vaccinated and unvaccinated people and cause severe disease in anyone who doesn't have a well-functioning and well-trained innate immune system (most vaccinated people).
1. What virus? U.S. labs probably were more likely involved with designing the toxic vaccines contents, including military labs, including in Ukraine, which is one of the reasons why Russia is attacking Ukraine!
2. The alleged benefits don't justify the risks; young adults are generally healthier, so less likely to get any illness. Vaccine boosters are even worse BS than one-off (toxic) vaccines, and will always lead to worse poisoning.
3. All the alleged C19 "variant" symptoms are obvious symptoms of prior C19 "vaccination", aka C19 "vaccine" poisoning symptoms, thus clearly amoral financial/power motivated fraud.
4. The C19 "dashboard" of Johns Hopkins, was clearly a cynical statistical deception, designed to stoke the C19 plandemic hysteria. The data collection for it should be fully automated, so it does seem strange that they need to manually update it, unless, like Climate Gate, they are also fudging the data?!
5. Translation: antiviral drugs are too toxic and all the extra injuries and deaths have become rather inconveniently public for their pharmaceutical corporation sponsors (rulers), now that a lot more people have become aware and are questioning this.
6. Food animal culling because of a BS virus and fake tests. All designed to spread baseless fear in the general population, possibly to "justify" more fake vaccines, and probably to deliberately destroy more of the food supply, to attempt to lead people into the "Build Back Better"/"Great Reset" 666 beast system, with far inferior plant/insect/lab junk "foods".
Most of the bird flu "cases" are from pcr test determination because of mandatory "testing" of flocks. The same agenda is at work as the CDC pcr tests which had a 90%+ false positive rate! The bird raisers know instantly if there is bird flu in their flocks - they don't need any stinking pcr tests - they just have to look at their flocks! The symptoms are damn obvious to the raiser! Too many times after the asymptomatic +pcr test, flocks are presumptively slaughtered, necropsy and proper serology shows no bird flu evidence, and the owners can't say so!
There is no solid proof for any virus or real DNA, so what are they even testing for?
It's stupid "medical" theatre and a waste of resources for no good reason; not that I eat any poultry any more, because of the frequent use of factory farms, drugs, and unhealthy feed which result in unhealthy meat.
Dr. Vanden Bossche,
Please comment on the latest Substack posting of Dr. Eric Topol at https://erictopol.substack.com/p/to-boost-or-not-to-boost
Thanks so much for your great, great work. I'm not qualified to judge the science, for the most part, but your humanity is stellar to me.
From the published text body, I note:
"Pfizer was responsible for the design and conduct of the trial; for the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and for the writing of the manuscript."
No greater conflict of interest could be imagined. And as the company has already been served billions of dollars in penalties for malfeasance, It can be considered fruit of the poison tree and dismissed on that basis alone.
I read that Bill Gates is a large investor in Pfizer. Sigh.
From what I have read/researched, the primary response to a coronavirus is cellular (nk cells, innate antibodies and Tcells) NOT humoral (adaptive B cell antibodies). Immune memory through natural infection is developed based on a broad selection of first expressed proteins during an infection and a subsequent linked recognition of these through multiple pathways (Tcells coordinating with Bcells etc..). These functionally conserved proteins are not the spike.
The mRNA transfections do no replicate this type of immune memory development.
Adaptive antibodies are the LAST thing the body develops for a mucosal respiratory infection. This has been known for ages. If folks like Topol don't know this, they're incompetent. If they do, they're not saying it and they're being deliberately deceptive.
i have never heard of topol before, i have not read the entirety of the post you point towards, yet i can tell you from the little i have read that topol most probably is on the paylist of pfizer et al.
if one takes a publication that is paid for by pfizer and takes it for fact one is either very stupid or bought and paid for.
and i do not think topol is that stupid...
Yes, not a resource to trust.
they’re able to avoid or to evade the pre-existing immunity, either from vaccine or from previous infection, that was based on a previous variant.” All existing covid-19 vaccines are based on the original “wild-type” strain.
"... with relatively preserved protection against severe disease in triple-vaccinated individuals.”
Here's that statement again. UK HSA/ONS data does NOT support that claim. What data is being used to continue to support this claim? Perhaps it is the low rate of severe infection in both the unvaccinated AND vaccinated which is being mistaken for a "vaccine" effect?
I have been following the theories since the day it became obvious Covid was going to spread worldwide. Based on numerous reports, sewerage testing & China’s own reactions the Wuhan military games looks like the most viable option, Italy, Canada, Iran ( one died from their infection) USA all reported a number of people suffering from a respiratory infection . American money definitely went to their Wuhan lab but it didn’t leak from America’s labs, or their would be more evidence of sickness & it would have spread to STH America much more quickly. China also did a mock run of a pandemic before the games shutting down the airport in Wuhan, yet when they knew there was an outbreak they didn’t bother. They have done too many things that an innocent party would not do. China is definitely the leak.
In the US early cases were called "mystery vaping deaths" or "pneumonia" or "bad flu".
You're right. Facts matter！ If we do our best to look for it, we will find many bad facts already.
DR.G.V.Bossche's theoretical explanation leads to facts in the near future ,I think.
> Lancet Report Claiming COVID Could Have Come from U.S. Lab Met With Uproar
This is just a theory, a possibilty, and opinion. When you have uproar about just a theory that's how you know you are dealing with close-minded people.
...and are probably right over the target.
Lies from MSM and biased medical journals continue. Thanks for the awareness GVB.
Hindsight the Alpha and Beta variants really weren’t that infectious—although they seemed like a lot of infections at the time—compared with how easily omicron, and delta before it, spread.
If I'm remembering correctly, Geert said that omicron is one of the most (if not THE most) infectious respiratory virus ever studied.
DR.G.V.Bossche's theory is difficult for laymen.
Concepts such as differential immunity, for example, are not found in any immunology textbook.
His easy-to-understand explanations like yours are very convincing and helpful to laymen. Thank you.
they’re able to avoid or to evade the pre-existing immunity, either from vaccine or from previous infection, that was based on a previous variant.” All existing covid-19 vaccines are based on the original “wild-type” strain.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.16.508299v1
I have been grappling with the biology behind the idea that numerous doses of this ´vaccine’ don’t stop transmission or infection but still seems to offer some protection against hospitalisation and death. Can anyone explain to me the mechanism? Is this notion still true - it seems to be quoted often but as I’ve become so cynical about everything, I no longer know what to believe. It appears to be the only thing saving the vaccine from
being completely useless (and probably harmful) in the majority of the population and I wonder if at this stage it is just more propaganda .
The mechanism is refusing to count cases in the 2 weeks after the vaccine, or in many cases even to test the vaccinated for Covid.
It isn't true that the more vaxxed you are, the better the chance of escaping severe disease/hospitalization. If you take a look at the NSW Australia data base, in the link below you will see that the more vaxxed, the greater the probability of winding up in the hospital.
forgot to put the link in. It is on page 1 of 11.
https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiODQ4NTg4OGUtNWU5ZS00MjQ3LWJmODgtNzI1N2RmOWY3N2Y3IiwidCI6IjZmMGU5YzQyLTk2Y2UtNDU1MS05NzAxLWJhMzFkMGQ2ZDE5ZSJ9&pageName=ReportSection1c3fdc161d4008c845a6
Yes you're right, the data doesn't really support that claim. Maybe Geert means that without that transinfection inhibiting effect from the vaccinal antibodies, vaccinees would be completeley vulnerable to ADED, therefore there is still some protection compared to the worst case scenario xD
I don't know - the current data is pretty clear but maybe it offered some protection a year ago.
I agree. I think it's a lie, just like "covid STOPS with each shotted person." If that were the case, why are so many shotted persons ending up in the hospital and dying? There should be NO shotted persons in the hospital at all.
Check out Dr. Vanden Bossche's papers on his website on the evolution of the virus. If I remember correctly, he describes how the same antibodies from the vaccines (which enhance infection in the upper respiratory tract) prevent the virus (which later migrates on certain type of cells from the upper respiratory tract to the the lower tract and other organs) from infecting other cells in those organs (e.g. the lung). Thereby severe disease is prevented since these organs are still protected from infection.
Additionally, this virulence-inhibiting effect buys time for killer T-cells to eliminate the virus in vaccinees (but not prevent infection). If frequently infected, T-cell hyperactivation would occur, which would eliminate infected cells more and more rapidly after infection and drastically reduce even mild symptoms of covid, while still not protecting against infection. This would explain why it currently seems like the pandemic is over with low hospitalizations and very mild (or even asymptomatic?) infections in vaccinees.
Finally, he also argues that T-cell hyperactivation in covid-19 vaccinees also protects the. from symptomatic disease from other certain glycosylated viruses, e.g. monkeypox, various types of flu. Since T cells don't prevent infection, people with mild or no symptoms of these diseases would spread them more without noticing, explaining these other current pandemics (asymptomatic spread). T-cell depletion is also a problem if this hyperactivation is really starting to occur in vaccinees.
That's his explanation at least of the current state of the pandemic as far as I remember.
I believe GVB says the non-neutralizing antibodies which promote infection are the very same ones that prevent trans-infection in the lung when they are transferred down there by being tethered to the dendritic cells in the upper respiratory system (as dendritic cells are known to do ((migrate)).
Once that “protection” of the lung is overcome by evolution, there is no longer protection from severe disease and death. The dreaded full-on antibody dependent enhancement of disease ADED will be in play.
Let’s hope this is wrong
Thanks for this. I will look at his website. Immunology is so complex - I always struggled with it.
He explains virtually all of what has just been communicated in several of his more recent interviews.
These are his two main papers which explain this protective effect:
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/predictions-gvb-on-evolution-c-19-pandemic
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/c-19-mass-vaccination-triggers-a-chain-reaction-of-new-pandemics-and-epidemics
You can also look up his interviews from like 3-4 months ago were he basically just explains these papers to lay audiences, e.g. at the Highwire with Del Bigtree (I think it's called "The Vanden Bossche warning" from May 2022).
I think you understand that the Spike protein produced by this mRNAVaccine directly causes thrombosis.
Furthermore, I believe that you understand from various papers that the Spike protein continues to be produced for at least 4 months.
Therefore, you should understand that both thrombosis and autoimmune diseases can occur in some people.
Bogus statistics such as VAERS show that the odds of this happening are more than 100 times higher than past flu vaccines.
You can also watch videos of these specific symptoms on the web.
For example, on https://www.kla.tv/en, you can search countless cases other than YouTube, such as Israel's sequelae.
This mRNA can be inserted into human DNA genes in a paper in in Vitro (laboratory experiment) at Lund University in Sweden.
It's out
2022Feb19: Sweden Lund University: Pfizer mRNA corona vaccine mRNA
It was shown that it "reverse transcribes into human DNA in 6 hours."
It is reverse transcribed using the human LINE-1 enzyme.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
I think you understand that if it gets into a person's DNA, it can continue to produce the Spike protein until the person dies.
However, it will be a long time before this possibility is demonstrated in humans.
After that, I think it's up to you to make a judgment based on common sense.
If you are concerned about being infected with SarsCov2, I think you should read the FLCCC Protocols and prepare accordingly.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
When I go to a doctor's office or other places where I am close to others, I take Ivermectin at dinner the day before according to the above preventive protocol.
I personally imported it from India. In Japan, not available to amateurs.
Side effects are very rare to begin with, and even if they occur, they are mild, so you can rest assured.
I have blood tests for other diseases every 3 months,
There are no abnormalities in the numerical values, and no subjective abnormalities caused by Ivermectin.
I understand all the negative mechanisms of this vaccine. I think it is an atrocious intervention but you misunderstand my point.
I want to know how they are trying to justify the protection against serious ill and death - I am not saying that this jab does protect against anything - but unless I understand their justification (however wrong it is), I cannot offer any contradiction because I don’t what I am trying to contradict.
I had many arguments with my husband before he took a jab and told him that it wouldn’t protect him from infection and that he could pass it on to me (this is back in August 21) and, what do you know, he got covid this year and passed it on to me. But he argued that it would stop him getting seriously ill and dying. How can I argue against this because I don’t know upon which basis this is being argued so I cannot offer a counter-argument.
Dr. Vanden Bossche says that this protection against serious illness/death is there in this Substack and I am simply asking for the biological mechanism because I find it very hard to understand how something that doesn’t stop you getting a disease can offer any protection.
I truly do not need any convincing that this medical procedure is very bad news.
I apologize for the misunderstanding you.
I graduated from the engineering department of one of Japan's top universities.
My wife is a veterinary graduate and she questioned mRNA vaccines in the early days of the pandemic.
So I started studying.
I studied the basics of immunology.
But Dr. Geert Vabden Bosshe's explanation is difficult for me, and I do not understand the details.
To really understand him, I think I need to study immunology and virology for two or three years.
What I can do for myself (I'm already past middle age) is to tell my relatives and friends about the dangers of mRNA vaccines and where to find information(Easy to understand even for amateurs) so that they can stay healthy.
At the moment, because of the emergence of the Omicron variant, non-neutralising antibodies that were induced by COVID vaccination have the upper hand in binding to the virus. It has been shown that when non-neutralising antibodies bind to the virus, they cause structural changes that enhance attachment of the virus to human ACE2 receptors. Cells in the upper respiratory tract are rich in ACE2 receptors while cells in the lower respiratory tract are not.
Infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions can attach themselves to dendritic cells in the upper respiratory tract. These dendritic cells bring the virus down to the lower respiratory tract where through the processes of trans-infection and trans-fusion (see Dr GVB's paper dated 9 May 2022 for definitions), the virus can now infect and cause severe disease in the lower respiratory tract. However, the same non-neutralising antibodies mentioned above will prevent the processes of trans-infection and trans-fusion and thereby prevent severe disease and death.
The really important point, though, is that the above prevention of severe disease and death by the non-neutralising antibodies is only temporary. This is because the virus is not standing still in the face of the pressure exerted by these non-neutralising antibodies. The virus will continually try to escape from such immune pressure, eventually becoming more virulent as a result. At that stage, the virus will break through the adaptive immune system of both vaccinated and unvaccinated people and cause severe disease in anyone who doesn't have a well-functioning and well-trained innate immune system (most vaccinated people).
Good morning Geert thanks for this once again timely informations much appreciated and straight to the point
Shouldnt those workers be wearing goggles? I thought the flu virus can also infect via the mucus membrane of the eyes...
Poor critters! VICTIMS OF MANMEAN! Well, sure the COVID-19
virus (and very likely OTHERS) come from U.S. labs. Why not if
Dr. Mengelefauci was/is involved with BOTH! STOP THE MURDER!
SURVIVE AND STAY WELL NATURALLY! I post publicly and freely on MeWe.
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH'S SAINTS!
1. What virus? U.S. labs probably were more likely involved with designing the toxic vaccines contents, including military labs, including in Ukraine, which is one of the reasons why Russia is attacking Ukraine!
2. The alleged benefits don't justify the risks; young adults are generally healthier, so less likely to get any illness. Vaccine boosters are even worse BS than one-off (toxic) vaccines, and will always lead to worse poisoning.
3. All the alleged C19 "variant" symptoms are obvious symptoms of prior C19 "vaccination", aka C19 "vaccine" poisoning symptoms, thus clearly amoral financial/power motivated fraud.
4. The C19 "dashboard" of Johns Hopkins, was clearly a cynical statistical deception, designed to stoke the C19 plandemic hysteria. The data collection for it should be fully automated, so it does seem strange that they need to manually update it, unless, like Climate Gate, they are also fudging the data?!
5. Translation: antiviral drugs are too toxic and all the extra injuries and deaths have become rather inconveniently public for their pharmaceutical corporation sponsors (rulers), now that a lot more people have become aware and are questioning this.
6. Food animal culling because of a BS virus and fake tests. All designed to spread baseless fear in the general population, possibly to "justify" more fake vaccines, and probably to deliberately destroy more of the food supply, to attempt to lead people into the "Build Back Better"/"Great Reset" 666 beast system, with far inferior plant/insect/lab junk "foods".