#4 mRNA in breastmilk is bad news. We haven't been given details about the new cases of liver failure of unknown cause in children except that authorities insist it isn't the vaccine because most of the children aren't vaccinated. However, it seems that breastfeeding children can be exposed to mRNA. Is some of it still in lipids? Will it distribute to the liver? Is there additional exposure to spike protein as well? Are there other means of transmission to children for either such as air or droplets?
thats what i think is happening. Question is how long psot vax are the jabbed people shedding it. That could be short term shedding but i also wonder about even saliva what would happen when mom gives their kid a kiss does it spread and then inoculate in a way i dont know
an idea worth exploring. sounds crazy but i was thinking maybe along the lines of the self-disseminating vaccines they (vets/wildlife mgmt) use for rabbit, rodent, etc. population control?
The most recent news that I read claimed that over half of the children had received the J&J (well, they say adenovirus, but the Oxford vaccine wasn't offered in the USA).
This article doesn't say the kids received the j&j, just that their hepatitis was caused by adenovirus infection. It would be interesting to know if their parents had the change a vaccine.
they made HIV airborne and transferrable through bodily liquids. If the kids parents, teachers, etc were vaccinated and they had breast milk or even kissed their mom coupled with it being airborne for a period of time post vaccination (viral shedding? i think?) then its clear these vaccines have spread to infect kids who cannot cope. I hope not just a thought i had
God bless you, Geert. It must make you sick to your stomach to see all the covid insanity.
While my religious exemption from "vaccination" was accommodated by my employer, I lost my job last October for refusing to wear a mask and live the lie of "protection," or be part of promoting harms masks cause, especially to children. I'm still struggling to replace that income, but that's a small thing compared to the lives that have been needlessly lost, and health that's been ruined by the lunacy.
It's a tragic fact that the so-called "health authorities" don't really give a damn about health. Fealty to their corporate pharma and government overlords has decidely proven that.
So the way I see it, yes you are right to worry but in most cases, you probably don't have much choice. The blood would need to be tested for the antibodies which come only with natural infection and immunity to the nucleocapsid part of the virus AND those which come from vaccination - because many who had natural immunity were forced into vaccination needlessly. If you are fully private in a private system and were prepared to pay, you could probably do so. But remember, you should expect that at least 70%+ of the blood will be from people who have had at least one injection, so that might be a long and costly process. In many ways if you are in need of a transfusion!
Africa, of course, has the "HIV" problem - a whole 'nother can of worms! But I like the sound of a "Pureblood blood center"!! As of now, yes, staying out of trouble and away from the "vaccines" is the best solution - but both are easier said than done!
Yes We can do what we can do to keep ourselves healthy for now.
I have worked with Africans and stayed in Africa for a short while. Yes I'm aware of other challenges they face. But I like Mama Afrika and her energy. My African friends in the south are all Covid free and jab free. They are v conscious.
Gosh, on the first bundle of Pfizer documents released via court, I believe 291 conditions are listed under adverse events of special interest (the list of side effects to look out for). This is going to be more than that, beyond the imaginable.
Always appreciate these consolidated articles. The timing of the all-cause mortality rates based on vaccine type is...interesting. The CDC and FDA claim J&J performed worse in terms of all-cause mortality, and restrictions passed by the FDA only two days ago will make it nearly impossible to get. How curious that the Danish study is in conflict with those claims, but the USA's government has struggled throughout the pandemic to agree with data published by other countries. Other countries restricted the use of Moderna in children, they backed off the recommendation of booster shots, and some are suggesting children should receive only a single injection, meanwhile the USA is urging a second booster in adults and boosters in children despite alarm bells going off all over the place.
Hey Geert, really enjoy your work. Thank you for fighting the good fight. I listened to you on the Highwire. Damn it man, that was hard to get through. It's very troubling on so many levels. I came across this piece that unfortunately is proof positive of your claim. This is ABSOLUTE EVIDENCE the government has to know. You said Fauci was "clueless," well maybe he was but he's damn sure not anymore. The CDC, NIH, FDA, etc have to know about these numbers as they are similar to what we have seen from data out of the UK, Scotland, etc. Anyone saying that children 0-5 years of age should now get the shot are guilty of Murder. I guess this is the ADE I first learned last year from you and Bigtree. It may be another term but its evidence that the vaccines are indeed assisting the virus. And I agree, if another more virulent strain will seal the fate of many who took the shots.
Will getting novavax vaccine 5 months after contracting covid cause problems.
I had a headache for 2 days and felt tired but that was about it. I was on ivermectin, d3, quercetin, zinc and k2.
I live in canada and am not allowed to get on a plane and visit my kids and i'm getting frustrated to the point of taking the non-mrna option to free me for travel.
GVB would obviously be your most reliable source but if you would allow me to offer an opinion (My edcational background is in Biochemistry and Microbiology before an MBA and a long career in Big Pharma on the business side at a seniot level).
IMHO the jury is still out on Novavax and the burden of proof is on them to demonstrate a better safety profile.
There are some reasons to think it might be a safer option, BUT on the other hand, given what we now know about spikes (including the tendency for the S1 protein to be cleaved away and cause problems - and yes, I am aware that Novavax say they prevented this from happening, but Pfizer also said a lot of things about the LNPs remaining at the injection site!!) the idea of injecting spikes directly to induce an immune response (whilst also recognizing that at least human cells are not involved in the manufacturing process) is of at least theoretical concern subject to being disproven in clinical practise.
I say all of the above as speculative observation in the spirit of "Question Everything"!!
Regarding the paper on "The wrong vaccine?", it seems strange that immediately after these reports, the FDA placed restrictions on the Janssen/J&J (DNA) gene therapy because of CV effects - something already known for a long time and equally applicable to the mRNA gene therapies?
Perhaps the truth lies elsewhere which the FDA is not divilging - possibly in connection with adenovirus used as the delivery vehicle in the DNA gene therapies? Alternatively, without any real scientific justification, there might be the appearance that FDA is favoring some manufacturers over others?
Live adenovirus vaccines have been around for a long time. They have never been FDA approved because of oncogenicity. The US military services have been using them. The argument for the adenovirus vector COVID shots is that it's a non-replicating virus (with an essential part of the genome clipped out). But, in vitro, it has been shown to regain the ability to replicate, if it comes into contact with wild-type adenovirus and recombines. The J&J virus is simian, not human, and I do not know whether simian and human viruses are similar enough that those who live in North America would be at risk. Adenoviruses are common in the community, just as coronaviruses, implicated in respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses. I apologize that I cannot find my source any longer. When vaccine mandates were first announced at my workplace, the J&J vaccine was suggested to me as a safer alternative to Pfizer. It may be, but I don't think by much.
Thanks and yes, a Chimpanzee adenovirus was selected as the delivery vector because it was believed that many if not most would have immunity to all common human adnenoviruses, so the immune system would destory the DNA package before it could enter cells to do its work of producing spike proteins and spikes. Based on what scientific data, we do not know, but the ssumption must have been made that a simian adenorus, once attenuated, would be harmless. Fair assumption? We don't know
And that is all we know for sure One of the major concerns about ALL these gene therapies is that they are experimental unknowns and little clinical data supports their efficacy and safefty and there is no long-term safety data. To use such experimental products in a mass vaccination campaign (even setting aside GVB's concerns) for a "disease" with such a high survival rate was an extremely risky strategy.
#4 mRNA in breastmilk is bad news. We haven't been given details about the new cases of liver failure of unknown cause in children except that authorities insist it isn't the vaccine because most of the children aren't vaccinated. However, it seems that breastfeeding children can be exposed to mRNA. Is some of it still in lipids? Will it distribute to the liver? Is there additional exposure to spike protein as well? Are there other means of transmission to children for either such as air or droplets?
or are they shedding and spreading it that way?
thats what i think is happening. Question is how long psot vax are the jabbed people shedding it. That could be short term shedding but i also wonder about even saliva what would happen when mom gives their kid a kiss does it spread and then inoculate in a way i dont know
an idea worth exploring. sounds crazy but i was thinking maybe along the lines of the self-disseminating vaccines they (vets/wildlife mgmt) use for rabbit, rodent, etc. population control?
DAARPA is many years & billions of dollars ahead on that idea!
The most recent news that I read claimed that over half of the children had received the J&J (well, they say adenovirus, but the Oxford vaccine wasn't offered in the USA).
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/06/cdc-investigating-severe-hepatitis-in-children.html
EDIT: NEVERMIND, I CAN'T READ.
This article doesn't say the kids received the j&j, just that their hepatitis was caused by adenovirus infection. It would be interesting to know if their parents had the change a vaccine.
Oops, you're absolutely correct. That'll teach me for skimming.
😄👍🏼
they made HIV airborne and transferrable through bodily liquids. If the kids parents, teachers, etc were vaccinated and they had breast milk or even kissed their mom coupled with it being airborne for a period of time post vaccination (viral shedding? i think?) then its clear these vaccines have spread to infect kids who cannot cope. I hope not just a thought i had
God bless you, Geert. It must make you sick to your stomach to see all the covid insanity.
While my religious exemption from "vaccination" was accommodated by my employer, I lost my job last October for refusing to wear a mask and live the lie of "protection," or be part of promoting harms masks cause, especially to children. I'm still struggling to replace that income, but that's a small thing compared to the lives that have been needlessly lost, and health that's been ruined by the lunacy.
It's a tragic fact that the so-called "health authorities" don't really give a damn about health. Fealty to their corporate pharma and government overlords has decidely proven that.
Godspeed to you, brave one!
You're so kind, thank you. But to paraphrase the fabulous Naomi Wolfe, I'm not brave. Too many other people are just cowards.
💞
💞
I'm now concerned about blood transfusions too!
I read somewhere (but it may be just another false story) that some blood banks were not accepting blood from the jabbed. Has anyone else heard this ?
Not that I'm aware of.
American red cross accpets blood from jabbed donors under FDA blood donation eligibility guidance. Deferral times may vary.
So the way I see it, yes you are right to worry but in most cases, you probably don't have much choice. The blood would need to be tested for the antibodies which come only with natural infection and immunity to the nucleocapsid part of the virus AND those which come from vaccination - because many who had natural immunity were forced into vaccination needlessly. If you are fully private in a private system and were prepared to pay, you could probably do so. But remember, you should expect that at least 70%+ of the blood will be from people who have had at least one injection, so that might be a long and costly process. In many ways if you are in need of a transfusion!
I guess three options left.
- stay healthy, stay clear
- form a blood centre with fellow unjabbed
- move to Africa (as Geert says Africa will win )
Africa, of course, has the "HIV" problem - a whole 'nother can of worms! But I like the sound of a "Pureblood blood center"!! As of now, yes, staying out of trouble and away from the "vaccines" is the best solution - but both are easier said than done!
Yes We can do what we can do to keep ourselves healthy for now.
I have worked with Africans and stayed in Africa for a short while. Yes I'm aware of other challenges they face. But I like Mama Afrika and her energy. My African friends in the south are all Covid free and jab free. They are v conscious.
Gosh, on the first bundle of Pfizer documents released via court, I believe 291 conditions are listed under adverse events of special interest (the list of side effects to look out for). This is going to be more than that, beyond the imaginable.
This must be driving genuine doctors nuts too. I hope you can find a way to work around it in a less intrusive, more natural form...
Always appreciate these consolidated articles. The timing of the all-cause mortality rates based on vaccine type is...interesting. The CDC and FDA claim J&J performed worse in terms of all-cause mortality, and restrictions passed by the FDA only two days ago will make it nearly impossible to get. How curious that the Danish study is in conflict with those claims, but the USA's government has struggled throughout the pandemic to agree with data published by other countries. Other countries restricted the use of Moderna in children, they backed off the recommendation of booster shots, and some are suggesting children should receive only a single injection, meanwhile the USA is urging a second booster in adults and boosters in children despite alarm bells going off all over the place.
“It would have been worse
if I hadn’t had the Quackcine”
https://dailysceptic.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/20220503_162643-1651815183.8064-300x172.jpg
Thank you for all your brilliance and explanation of all this informative information. God Help Us.
Hey Geert, really enjoy your work. Thank you for fighting the good fight. I listened to you on the Highwire. Damn it man, that was hard to get through. It's very troubling on so many levels. I came across this piece that unfortunately is proof positive of your claim. This is ABSOLUTE EVIDENCE the government has to know. You said Fauci was "clueless," well maybe he was but he's damn sure not anymore. The CDC, NIH, FDA, etc have to know about these numbers as they are similar to what we have seen from data out of the UK, Scotland, etc. Anyone saying that children 0-5 years of age should now get the shot are guilty of Murder. I guess this is the ADE I first learned last year from you and Bigtree. It may be another term but its evidence that the vaccines are indeed assisting the virus. And I agree, if another more virulent strain will seal the fate of many who took the shots.
https://thecountersignal.com/99-per-cent-covid-deaths-in-canada-among-vaccinated/
Geert
Will getting novavax vaccine 5 months after contracting covid cause problems.
I had a headache for 2 days and felt tired but that was about it. I was on ivermectin, d3, quercetin, zinc and k2.
I live in canada and am not allowed to get on a plane and visit my kids and i'm getting frustrated to the point of taking the non-mrna option to free me for travel.
What do you think?
GVB would obviously be your most reliable source but if you would allow me to offer an opinion (My edcational background is in Biochemistry and Microbiology before an MBA and a long career in Big Pharma on the business side at a seniot level).
IMHO the jury is still out on Novavax and the burden of proof is on them to demonstrate a better safety profile.
There are some reasons to think it might be a safer option, BUT on the other hand, given what we now know about spikes (including the tendency for the S1 protein to be cleaved away and cause problems - and yes, I am aware that Novavax say they prevented this from happening, but Pfizer also said a lot of things about the LNPs remaining at the injection site!!) the idea of injecting spikes directly to induce an immune response (whilst also recognizing that at least human cells are not involved in the manufacturing process) is of at least theoretical concern subject to being disproven in clinical practise.
I say all of the above as speculative observation in the spirit of "Question Everything"!!
Regarding the paper on "The wrong vaccine?", it seems strange that immediately after these reports, the FDA placed restrictions on the Janssen/J&J (DNA) gene therapy because of CV effects - something already known for a long time and equally applicable to the mRNA gene therapies?
Perhaps the truth lies elsewhere which the FDA is not divilging - possibly in connection with adenovirus used as the delivery vehicle in the DNA gene therapies? Alternatively, without any real scientific justification, there might be the appearance that FDA is favoring some manufacturers over others?
Live adenovirus vaccines have been around for a long time. They have never been FDA approved because of oncogenicity. The US military services have been using them. The argument for the adenovirus vector COVID shots is that it's a non-replicating virus (with an essential part of the genome clipped out). But, in vitro, it has been shown to regain the ability to replicate, if it comes into contact with wild-type adenovirus and recombines. The J&J virus is simian, not human, and I do not know whether simian and human viruses are similar enough that those who live in North America would be at risk. Adenoviruses are common in the community, just as coronaviruses, implicated in respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses. I apologize that I cannot find my source any longer. When vaccine mandates were first announced at my workplace, the J&J vaccine was suggested to me as a safer alternative to Pfizer. It may be, but I don't think by much.
Thanks and yes, a Chimpanzee adenovirus was selected as the delivery vector because it was believed that many if not most would have immunity to all common human adnenoviruses, so the immune system would destory the DNA package before it could enter cells to do its work of producing spike proteins and spikes. Based on what scientific data, we do not know, but the ssumption must have been made that a simian adenorus, once attenuated, would be harmless. Fair assumption? We don't know
And that is all we know for sure One of the major concerns about ALL these gene therapies is that they are experimental unknowns and little clinical data supports their efficacy and safefty and there is no long-term safety data. To use such experimental products in a mass vaccination campaign (even setting aside GVB's concerns) for a "disease" with such a high survival rate was an extremely risky strategy.
Does someone know where the donate button went on his website (https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/)? I can't find it...