True, but is seems very clear that the politicians and their doomsday shamans (one could call them technocratic bought-and-paid-for "scientists" but let's be charitable) will never listen.
"And this is just the start. We’ll soon even provide evidence that the residual efficiency of vaccines against transmission (40 % according to analysis from WHO!) is NOT due to the vaccine but due to trained immunity. This is particularly the case in countries with less aggressive mas vax campaigns (several individuals got an opportunity to ‘train’ their innate immunity prior to receiving the vaccine!)."
Looking forward to this!
I'm working on an equation myself to show how systematically biased the vaccine efficacy studies are which according to current definitions would allow for us to bring to market a vaccine that kills 99% of the recipients but still show a 95% VE.
Prof. Norman Fenton along with Prof. Martin Neil, of Queen Mary University London, have demolished two pillars of this through demonstration of two types of errors in VE studies: 1) Delayed reporting (causing denominator changes to lag), 2) Outcome misclassification (differentially labelling participants in treated group as untreated until a specified point).
However, I think their specific focus is limited to outcome misclassification and delay but there is something more sinister at play here. A third kind of error exists where we do no fully recognize the rise of prevalence of the condition being treated against that's contingent upon the accelerated uptake and administration of the treatment in response to rising perceived VE itself. This is a double whammy where those who are most likely to suffer from the condition by getting treated, enlarge the susceptibility pool while also never get recognized as having been treated until they make it safely out of the hazardous weeks post injection-infection. If they make it out, their acquired immunity post infection is mislabelled as vaccinal immunity.
this is much more. It's complication and requires careful examination of status changes in the patient along with incidence densities at a time where most governments refuse to release CFRs and infections (by vaccination date, by past seropositivity)
After the war, the top surviving German leaders were tried for Nazi Germany’s crimes. Their trial was held before an International Military Tribunal (IMT) in Nuremberg, Germany. Judges from the Allied powers—Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States—presided over the hearing of 22 major Nazi criminals.
Subsequently, the United States held 12 additional trials in Nuremberg of high-level officials of the German government, military, and SS as well as medical professionals and leading industrialists. The crimes charged before the Nuremberg courts were crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes.
In all, 199 defendants were tried at Nuremberg, 161 were convicted and 37 were sentenced to death, including 12 of those tried by the IMT. The defendants generally acknowledged that the crimes they were accused of occurred but denied that they were responsible, as they were following orders from a higher authority.
After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the American judges pronounced their verdict on August 20, 1947. Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death. They were executed on June 2, 1948.
Amazing initiative. Especially nice to see medical publications that are starting to peel back this onion.
True, but is seems very clear that the politicians and their doomsday shamans (one could call them technocratic bought-and-paid-for "scientists" but let's be charitable) will never listen.
"And this is just the start. We’ll soon even provide evidence that the residual efficiency of vaccines against transmission (40 % according to analysis from WHO!) is NOT due to the vaccine but due to trained immunity. This is particularly the case in countries with less aggressive mas vax campaigns (several individuals got an opportunity to ‘train’ their innate immunity prior to receiving the vaccine!)."
Looking forward to this!
I'm working on an equation myself to show how systematically biased the vaccine efficacy studies are which according to current definitions would allow for us to bring to market a vaccine that kills 99% of the recipients but still show a 95% VE.
I am looking forward to your update.
Prof. Norman Fenton along with Prof. Martin Neil, of Queen Mary University London, have demolished two pillars of this through demonstration of two types of errors in VE studies: 1) Delayed reporting (causing denominator changes to lag), 2) Outcome misclassification (differentially labelling participants in treated group as untreated until a specified point).
However, I think their specific focus is limited to outcome misclassification and delay but there is something more sinister at play here. A third kind of error exists where we do no fully recognize the rise of prevalence of the condition being treated against that's contingent upon the accelerated uptake and administration of the treatment in response to rising perceived VE itself. This is a double whammy where those who are most likely to suffer from the condition by getting treated, enlarge the susceptibility pool while also never get recognized as having been treated until they make it safely out of the hazardous weeks post injection-infection. If they make it out, their acquired immunity post infection is mislabelled as vaccinal immunity.
this is much more. It's complication and requires careful examination of status changes in the patient along with incidence densities at a time where most governments refuse to release CFRs and infections (by vaccination date, by past seropositivity)
Source For Prof. Fenton and Prof. Neil's analysis. https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/12/the-impact-of-misclassifying-deaths-in.html
Feel free to print and post this info to doctors. Feel free to post it on popular Facebook pages including those of your elected officials.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5c0be989754e79db0e95bde5dac38afb74ecaba65e565e0f3f982db93a5ae9a8.png
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Figure-1-Number-of-Deaths-Since-1990-feature-1024x533.jpg
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Figure-2-Deaths-per-Million-Doses-Since-2010-CHART-1.jpg
NUREMBERG TRIALS 16 DOCTORS SENTENCED TO DEATH
After the war, the top surviving German leaders were tried for Nazi Germany’s crimes. Their trial was held before an International Military Tribunal (IMT) in Nuremberg, Germany. Judges from the Allied powers—Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States—presided over the hearing of 22 major Nazi criminals.
Subsequently, the United States held 12 additional trials in Nuremberg of high-level officials of the German government, military, and SS as well as medical professionals and leading industrialists. The crimes charged before the Nuremberg courts were crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes.
In all, 199 defendants were tried at Nuremberg, 161 were convicted and 37 were sentenced to death, including 12 of those tried by the IMT. The defendants generally acknowledged that the crimes they were accused of occurred but denied that they were responsible, as they were following orders from a higher authority.
After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the American judges pronounced their verdict on August 20, 1947. Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death. They were executed on June 2, 1948.
Excellent! I am so pleased to see this! Sharing :)