86 Comments
User's avatar
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Beyond a blunder ….. the ACOG still recommends the jabs to pregnant women . If they knew it was a blunder they would STOP it immediately and take it off the market. This is an evil crime .

Tim McCormack's avatar

Mistakes were not made. An agenda was executed.

mykcooper's avatar

What if........ what if, it wasn't incompetence? Just, what if..... it was all planned and orchestrated to look like incompetence. Research Dr David Martin. This medical event has been in the planning for some years and is the forerunner to the biggest power grab in the history of the world.

Kyra's avatar

It was Dr David Martin who woke me up over 3 years ago. It was a step by step plan by evil people, and it continues. When you hear his evidence you just can't deny the atrocity of it all.

Truth and Justice's avatar

The fact they they refused to withdraw the mRNA shots from the market as soon as the data showed they are dangerous, tells us everything.

TAS's avatar

Carefully planned execution of as many as possible. I wonder if this will wipe out a lot of white humanity. High % of the black community along with the millions crossing the border in many country’s were not jabbed…you have to wonder?

Jack Roberts's avatar

From where these policies originated it wasn't mismanagement or a blunder. It was calculated it, was meant to harm, and to test a population as to how many of their rights that they would give up. Until we understand that those that started this meant to kill and maim, they will, no doubt, do this again.

Shrugged's avatar

Geert, Our government has been on the wrong side of many medical/public health issues for decades and refuses to recognize legitimate peer reviewed research results (e.g. Ivermectin) that would have negated the emergency use authorization for the "shot". This is US politics, but it affected the whole world. They continue to advance gene therapy shots.

Their refusal to do what is right is intentional. There is no other reasonable conclusion.

Your writings have always been logical and based on science. As such, it threatens the US agencies like the FDA and CDC. Soon, we'll all have to answer to WHO.

Gary F's avatar

And they are still using the same EUA 4 years in!

Kyra's avatar

In Msrch of 2021 an interview with Dr Vandana Shiva in Common Ground Magazine came out. She had recently published her newest book, Oneness vs The 1%. In the article she cited a new patent issued to Microsoft on March 26th 2020, right when lockdown happened. It gave Microsoft (Bill Gates) the right to mine human body activity including radiation, brain activity, blood flow, organ activity, etc. You sit in front of your computer and he has the right to monitor everything about you. What can the computer really detect, I don't know. The nature and timing of it gave me chills. I told a number of people about it, even called into a radio show discussing technological advances. Nobody seemed concerned, are you? Here's a link to the article:

https://issuu.com/commongroundmagazinecanada/docs/cg356

BTW Dr Shiva is amazing. If you don't know of her I recommend looking her up.

bjorn st wiklund's avatar

What was known before it was public by weeks/months/years... blunder or deliberate?

Antonio's avatar

No se equivoque, no fue un error.

Las élites económica y políticas globales sometieron a la población mundial a un experimento biológico y social. Un experimento que representa un crimen contra la humanidad como nunca se ha realizado. Reconocer sus acciones, sería reconocerse culpables, y por tanto, ser juzgados de estos incontables crímenes.

Wayne MacKenzie's avatar

Translation: The global economic and political elites subjected the world's population to a biological and social experiment. An experiment that represents a crime against humanity the likes of which has never been carried out. To acknowledge their actions would be to acknowledge guilt, and therefore to be judged for these countless crimes.

Truth and Justice's avatar

Thank you for the translation.

NaplesD's avatar

There was no pandemic.

TJ's avatar

Who among here is going with full trust with June timeline?

Craig Bitler's avatar

I will believe it when I see it and not until then.

Sam's avatar

They weren’t blunders or mistakes. If you knew that it was bad to mass vaccinate during an epidemic then so did the people who decided to do it. Especially with non sterilizing gene therapy. Those who recommend that every person get jabbed have seen the serious adverse effects, but they are ignoring them. That’s NOT a blunder!

Why don’t you respond to comments? Do you just post, but don’t care what people say or the questions they ask you?

Truth and Justice's avatar

Dr. Geert is a very busy man. Besides that, I believe it's wise that he doesn't answer to anyone. I would do the same. But I definitely understand your frustration. I agree with what you said that it wasn't a mistake at all. They knew exactly what they were doing and did it on purpose with a clear plan in mind. The reason they were so confident is because they believed they will get away with their crimes. I don't think it will happen this time because the scale of the affair is global and they went too far.

Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

Hey Geert.

Were those Ebola Ring Trials that you said were killing people also a giant blunder?

Did you ever sort out who designed them?

Hint: It's the dude who you acted like you didn't know on "Headwinds". Bob Malone.

MEME's avatar

If I got exposed to COVID and then got vaccinated then I’m doomed to killer variants, correct?

Kyra's avatar

My understanding is it depends on how many shots you got, how severe your covid was and your state of health. Get antivirals and take care of yourself and you will be ok.

PBinAB's avatar

Geert believes the ones who caught it prior will have retained antibodies but if you've had 3 of the jabs after, you no longer have innate immune protection as a front line defense.

Jon Schultz's avatar

Do you know how Dr. VB's assertions relate to the idea that the jabs have "negative efficacy," that they protect for a few months and then after that time you are more likely to get symptomatic disease and/or severe symptomatic disease than if you hadn't taken the shot(s)? If that's the case then someone who took, say, three jabs but hasn't had one for over a year is in a much different situation than someone who took three jabs with the last one being a month ago, no?

PBinAB's avatar

Yes, the first two doses of the vaccine cause your igG3 antibodies, your killer antibodies, to rise for a short period of time, but studies show that after two and definitely by dose 3 there is no further increase seen.

However, what does increase are igG4's antibodies. These are part of our adaptive immune system and are not good at killing diseased cells, hence Geert telling people they are sub-optimal. So people who have been vaccinated never fully kill off SarsCov2 because of this antibody response, which is why you hear about long Covid.

In fact, the large increase in igG4's basically instructs the innate immune system to stand down (igG4's respond to allergic reactions and instruct your killer cells to ignore the anaphylaxis so you don't go into a cytotoxic response). This is why you are hearing of people being diagnosed with fast moving cancer that they are unaware they have until stage 4 has been reached.

Geert's prediction of this virus mutating to a super bug seems to be so far, following his projected trajectory. It's a single strand RNA virus that infects the blood endothelial cells, making it highly infectious and with the ability to move through the blood stream, much like H5N1. Because vaccinated people cannot kill it, they are assisting in the production of this duper virus as it learns to get around the deficiencies the jab has created innthose with damaged immune systems.

Unfortunately, you cannot take your "feeling fine" as an indication you won't be impacted if you catch the version Geert foresees in the near future. Your immune system has been damaged, as I described above. Geert suggests you start taking Ivermectin and continue taking it to help your adaptive immune system fully kill off the virus and to help protect you in the future.

Jon Schultz's avatar

Great answer, thank you!

Dee's avatar

In this video Grace's father, Scott Schara, a beautiful young down syndrome lady that was murdered in United States hospital, talks about how they now are changing what is in ivermetin. Why would a pharma manufacturer continue to make a product that really actually helps you get better? Or maybe they say they changed the product so people like us won't buy it anymore but didn't really change it. Who knows anymore.

https://rumble.com/v4ny9r5-sg-anon-update-april-7-medical-murder-a-shock-event.html

JJ's avatar

The other way around. If you got Covid and then got vaxed, you will be better off. However, that won't matter if you got multiple shots.

Dee's avatar

Nah, the COVID shots are poison. Again the COVID shots are poison. It was never a good idea to get these shots.

Truth and Justice's avatar

Not necessarily. If you got sick with covid, exposure and infection are not the same, then you got the shots, you will still have some immunity and especially if you got only one shot. The ones who are in danger are those who received at least two MRna shots but never had a covid infection before the injections.

Deborah Weaver's avatar

The winner of every war throughout history then rewrites history. The few alive at the end of the Deagel Depopulation will be reprogrammed and the new regime will merely rewrite history.

Book burning will happen by 2030 so there will be no proof of what really happened available for future generations.

Sorry, but how else can they achieve their goal. They wouldn’t want the next generation to know how they intentionally murdered billions of people.

Of course, this assumes that anyone actually is capable of evading the obvious harm being done in the blood even of the non-COVID vaccinated, as shown by Dr Ana Mihalcea.

God help us all.