“Because to take away a man's freedom of choice, even his freedom to make the wrong choice, is to manipulate him as though he were a puppet and not a person.” - Madeline L'Engle (1) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance measures are the same as for infectious disease. Current liberty-infringing measures to control severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including in particular, mandatory vaccines, rank towards the top of a public health intervention ladder known as the Nuffield intervention ladder.
I would like to thank you for all your hard work and perseverance throughout these past few years. We have all learned so much through your wonderful (&thorough) presentations + publications. Your courageous voice has meant so much and has been a lifeline to so many. For this I believe you will always be remembered.
I understand this is a difficult time for humanity (on so many levels) and I have a lot of pessimism personally, but having you here... something alike spotting an iridescent bird in the wilderness of insanity. Merci.
Please know we think of you and your family and wish you all the very best in health & happiness for the new year ahead. You are very dear to us.
The author seems to think that rationality will save us. She's wrong. We can waste all our time and energy on intellectual debates like this while meanwhile those who have have created this pandemic and the death shots laugh at us as we fritter away our energy in angst and useless discussion. We are at war, whether or not most people are aware of this fact. Until people understand that, we are doomed to death, sickness (from the poison injections), and slavery.
Everyone needs to read this book:
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Excellent article. The use of the word vaccine has helped the case for mandating. Under previous definitions, this gene therapy would not be called a vaccine. The definition has been changed to accommodate these experimental products as a 'preparation that stimulates the immune system'. Surely such a revision leaves the door wide open to call many preparations vaccines? Can the new definition not be challenged, because it is the old mental model of what a vaccine is, ( something that confers immunity) that is inhibiting many people's opinion on this matter. As a consequence they are indifferent to non 'vaccinated' people's concerns. This might seem petty, but I believe it is colouring the opinions of politicians and the judiciary in this matter. Also, if it could be pointed out what other treatments now comply with the new definition of vaccination, it might get people thinking? Also an anti vaxxer is now anyone who does not agree with vaccine mandates..incredible!
Carina, Love your opening quote! I believe many of us need to accept our past misjudgements. I live in Seattle and back in the beginning of the pandemic in March of 2020, I was screaming for the authorities to lock down Seattle to prevent the spread to the rest of the country. I didn't come to my senses till probably June of 2020. Also, I was aware of Geert's opinions back in 2020 and even though I believed the vaccine to be risky, I got jabbed in June of 2021 to silence my wife's nugging. At the time I had some trust in the alphabet agencies and thought there was some rational oversight of big pharma. I know this not to be the case now and that the alphabets do the bidding of big pharma or vise versa. As you can see I'm struggling to come to grips with my ego. Think of the egos of all the scientist and public leaders that were wrong repeatily through this pandemic and what they must be going through currently? Thank you so much for this article. We need sound logic like this to wake up from this dangerous mass psychosis.
If some folks want a "nanny state" (most often the chronically ill or disabled) while others don't (most often the strong and healthy), then it should be something that people can opt into or out of. Like a subscription service. That way everyone could live the life they choose according to their needs and desires. And then we'd have one less thing to fight over. Simple.
Dear Geert,
I would like to thank you for all your hard work and perseverance throughout these past few years. We have all learned so much through your wonderful (&thorough) presentations + publications. Your courageous voice has meant so much and has been a lifeline to so many. For this I believe you will always be remembered.
I understand this is a difficult time for humanity (on so many levels) and I have a lot of pessimism personally, but having you here... something alike spotting an iridescent bird in the wilderness of insanity. Merci.
Please know we think of you and your family and wish you all the very best in health & happiness for the new year ahead. You are very dear to us.
Stay strong xx
A mind changed against its will is of the same opinion still
The author seems to think that rationality will save us. She's wrong. We can waste all our time and energy on intellectual debates like this while meanwhile those who have have created this pandemic and the death shots laugh at us as we fritter away our energy in angst and useless discussion. We are at war, whether or not most people are aware of this fact. Until people understand that, we are doomed to death, sickness (from the poison injections), and slavery.
Everyone needs to read this book:
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Excellent article. The use of the word vaccine has helped the case for mandating. Under previous definitions, this gene therapy would not be called a vaccine. The definition has been changed to accommodate these experimental products as a 'preparation that stimulates the immune system'. Surely such a revision leaves the door wide open to call many preparations vaccines? Can the new definition not be challenged, because it is the old mental model of what a vaccine is, ( something that confers immunity) that is inhibiting many people's opinion on this matter. As a consequence they are indifferent to non 'vaccinated' people's concerns. This might seem petty, but I believe it is colouring the opinions of politicians and the judiciary in this matter. Also, if it could be pointed out what other treatments now comply with the new definition of vaccination, it might get people thinking? Also an anti vaxxer is now anyone who does not agree with vaccine mandates..incredible!
Carina, Love your opening quote! I believe many of us need to accept our past misjudgements. I live in Seattle and back in the beginning of the pandemic in March of 2020, I was screaming for the authorities to lock down Seattle to prevent the spread to the rest of the country. I didn't come to my senses till probably June of 2020. Also, I was aware of Geert's opinions back in 2020 and even though I believed the vaccine to be risky, I got jabbed in June of 2021 to silence my wife's nugging. At the time I had some trust in the alphabet agencies and thought there was some rational oversight of big pharma. I know this not to be the case now and that the alphabets do the bidding of big pharma or vise versa. As you can see I'm struggling to come to grips with my ego. Think of the egos of all the scientist and public leaders that were wrong repeatily through this pandemic and what they must be going through currently? Thank you so much for this article. We need sound logic like this to wake up from this dangerous mass psychosis.
If some folks want a "nanny state" (most often the chronically ill or disabled) while others don't (most often the strong and healthy), then it should be something that people can opt into or out of. Like a subscription service. That way everyone could live the life they choose according to their needs and desires. And then we'd have one less thing to fight over. Simple.