I would like to thank you for all your hard work and perseverance throughout these past few years. We have all learned so much through your wonderful (&thorough) presentations + publications. Your courageous voice has meant so much and has been a lifeline to so many. For this I believe you will always be remembered.
I understand this is a difficult time for humanity (on so many levels) and I have a lot of pessimism personally, but having you here... something alike spotting an iridescent bird in the wilderness of insanity. Merci.
Please know we think of you and your family and wish you all the very best in health & happiness for the new year ahead. You are very dear to us.
That's so lovely. Geert is our scholar warrior and we are all so greatful for a man as knowledgeable as he and with the strength of character to stand for us
The author seems to think that rationality will save us. She's wrong. We can waste all our time and energy on intellectual debates like this while meanwhile those who have have created this pandemic and the death shots laugh at us as we fritter away our energy in angst and useless discussion. We are at war, whether or not most people are aware of this fact. Until people understand that, we are doomed to death, sickness (from the poison injections), and slavery.
Everyone needs to read this book:
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
This author is a very much an activist, and you are right this is a war. We are on the same side. In my mind, starting a conversation is never 'wrong' and understanding the language of public health is not a 'waste of time'. I am sure the book you make reference too uses the language of public heath to explain things from a rationale perspective which encourages people to get active. I'm looking forward to reading Mr Kennedy's book
Different styles contribute to the solution. I appreciate your approach, as it increases my vocabulary and insight into the institutional mechanisms at play. Loved the trauma/fear pieces 👍👍
Excellent article. The use of the word vaccine has helped the case for mandating. Under previous definitions, this gene therapy would not be called a vaccine. The definition has been changed to accommodate these experimental products as a 'preparation that stimulates the immune system'. Surely such a revision leaves the door wide open to call many preparations vaccines? Can the new definition not be challenged, because it is the old mental model of what a vaccine is, ( something that confers immunity) that is inhibiting many people's opinion on this matter. As a consequence they are indifferent to non 'vaccinated' people's concerns. This might seem petty, but I believe it is colouring the opinions of politicians and the judiciary in this matter. Also, if it could be pointed out what other treatments now comply with the new definition of vaccination, it might get people thinking? Also an anti vaxxer is now anyone who does not agree with vaccine mandates..incredible!
Hi Andy thanks, you are right. many definitions have been changed in 2020 in the attempt to rewrite our language. There is inoculation, vaccination and immunisation. Pfizers is a biological agent;Moderna calls theirs an operating system designed to plug and play interchangeably with different programmes. I discuss and reference these definitions in my book 'COVERT-19'. In fact these 'vaccines' used to be called 'gene vaccines' back in the day. These are both mRNA and DNA vaccines (which are not as talked about). I’m not too concerned about their definitions, I am pro-natural immunity
Carina, Love your opening quote! I believe many of us need to accept our past misjudgements. I live in Seattle and back in the beginning of the pandemic in March of 2020, I was screaming for the authorities to lock down Seattle to prevent the spread to the rest of the country. I didn't come to my senses till probably June of 2020. Also, I was aware of Geert's opinions back in 2020 and even though I believed the vaccine to be risky, I got jabbed in June of 2021 to silence my wife's nugging. At the time I had some trust in the alphabet agencies and thought there was some rational oversight of big pharma. I know this not to be the case now and that the alphabets do the bidding of big pharma or vise versa. As you can see I'm struggling to come to grips with my ego. Think of the egos of all the scientist and public leaders that were wrong repeatily through this pandemic and what they must be going through currently? Thank you so much for this article. We need sound logic like this to wake up from this dangerous mass psychosis.
Thanks so much for your kind comments Mike. Yes Madeline L'Engle said it well. I love using quotes. Someone has always said it better. I appreciate your personal reflection of your journey and your story is an all too familiar one of being coerced by family with good intentions. I love your alphabet agencies! A healthy dose of ego fuels willpower but I agree, it is hard for many to admit when have been had and then there is a simultaneous shame that many will need our help with overcoming this year. Your emotions are absolutely normal. Social psychologists also describe ‘cognitive dissonance’ in this triangle, which is the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes. You are exactly the type of person we need to have on our side now, and your awakening gives us hope. Keep true to yourself
If some folks want a "nanny state" (most often the chronically ill or disabled) while others don't (most often the strong and healthy), then it should be something that people can opt into or out of. Like a subscription service. That way everyone could live the life they choose according to their needs and desires. And then we'd have one less thing to fight over. Simple.
You are welcome and thanks for your comments although they are frightening. You are right. Their definition of 'health' is not the one I resonate with. I discuss Rockefeller public health and the globalist agendas in my book 'COVERT-19'; perhaps the origins of public health and a summary of their agendas would make a good article on VSS
Dear Geert,
I would like to thank you for all your hard work and perseverance throughout these past few years. We have all learned so much through your wonderful (&thorough) presentations + publications. Your courageous voice has meant so much and has been a lifeline to so many. For this I believe you will always be remembered.
I understand this is a difficult time for humanity (on so many levels) and I have a lot of pessimism personally, but having you here... something alike spotting an iridescent bird in the wilderness of insanity. Merci.
Please know we think of you and your family and wish you all the very best in health & happiness for the new year ahead. You are very dear to us.
Stay strong xx
That's so lovely. Geert is our scholar warrior and we are all so greatful for a man as knowledgeable as he and with the strength of character to stand for us
A mind changed against its will is of the same opinion still
The author seems to think that rationality will save us. She's wrong. We can waste all our time and energy on intellectual debates like this while meanwhile those who have have created this pandemic and the death shots laugh at us as we fritter away our energy in angst and useless discussion. We are at war, whether or not most people are aware of this fact. Until people understand that, we are doomed to death, sickness (from the poison injections), and slavery.
Everyone needs to read this book:
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
This author is a very much an activist, and you are right this is a war. We are on the same side. In my mind, starting a conversation is never 'wrong' and understanding the language of public health is not a 'waste of time'. I am sure the book you make reference too uses the language of public heath to explain things from a rationale perspective which encourages people to get active. I'm looking forward to reading Mr Kennedy's book
Different styles contribute to the solution. I appreciate your approach, as it increases my vocabulary and insight into the institutional mechanisms at play. Loved the trauma/fear pieces 👍👍
Excellent article. The use of the word vaccine has helped the case for mandating. Under previous definitions, this gene therapy would not be called a vaccine. The definition has been changed to accommodate these experimental products as a 'preparation that stimulates the immune system'. Surely such a revision leaves the door wide open to call many preparations vaccines? Can the new definition not be challenged, because it is the old mental model of what a vaccine is, ( something that confers immunity) that is inhibiting many people's opinion on this matter. As a consequence they are indifferent to non 'vaccinated' people's concerns. This might seem petty, but I believe it is colouring the opinions of politicians and the judiciary in this matter. Also, if it could be pointed out what other treatments now comply with the new definition of vaccination, it might get people thinking? Also an anti vaxxer is now anyone who does not agree with vaccine mandates..incredible!
Hi Andy thanks, you are right. many definitions have been changed in 2020 in the attempt to rewrite our language. There is inoculation, vaccination and immunisation. Pfizers is a biological agent;Moderna calls theirs an operating system designed to plug and play interchangeably with different programmes. I discuss and reference these definitions in my book 'COVERT-19'. In fact these 'vaccines' used to be called 'gene vaccines' back in the day. These are both mRNA and DNA vaccines (which are not as talked about). I’m not too concerned about their definitions, I am pro-natural immunity
Carina, Love your opening quote! I believe many of us need to accept our past misjudgements. I live in Seattle and back in the beginning of the pandemic in March of 2020, I was screaming for the authorities to lock down Seattle to prevent the spread to the rest of the country. I didn't come to my senses till probably June of 2020. Also, I was aware of Geert's opinions back in 2020 and even though I believed the vaccine to be risky, I got jabbed in June of 2021 to silence my wife's nugging. At the time I had some trust in the alphabet agencies and thought there was some rational oversight of big pharma. I know this not to be the case now and that the alphabets do the bidding of big pharma or vise versa. As you can see I'm struggling to come to grips with my ego. Think of the egos of all the scientist and public leaders that were wrong repeatily through this pandemic and what they must be going through currently? Thank you so much for this article. We need sound logic like this to wake up from this dangerous mass psychosis.
Thanks so much for your kind comments Mike. Yes Madeline L'Engle said it well. I love using quotes. Someone has always said it better. I appreciate your personal reflection of your journey and your story is an all too familiar one of being coerced by family with good intentions. I love your alphabet agencies! A healthy dose of ego fuels willpower but I agree, it is hard for many to admit when have been had and then there is a simultaneous shame that many will need our help with overcoming this year. Your emotions are absolutely normal. Social psychologists also describe ‘cognitive dissonance’ in this triangle, which is the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes. You are exactly the type of person we need to have on our side now, and your awakening gives us hope. Keep true to yourself
If some folks want a "nanny state" (most often the chronically ill or disabled) while others don't (most often the strong and healthy), then it should be something that people can opt into or out of. Like a subscription service. That way everyone could live the life they choose according to their needs and desires. And then we'd have one less thing to fight over. Simple.
You are welcome and thanks for your comments although they are frightening. You are right. Their definition of 'health' is not the one I resonate with. I discuss Rockefeller public health and the globalist agendas in my book 'COVERT-19'; perhaps the origins of public health and a summary of their agendas would make a good article on VSS