Question: Are other bat coronaviruses posing a threat to human health, even to the extent that new vaccines ought to be developed as recently suggested in: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1010828 ? Answer: This is yet another example of great scientists drawing the wrong conclusions. It is completely distracting us from the real issue, which is the
The answer to your question Geert, is No. I know I deserve an A+ for that answer. They just want the same results- the same 90trillion dollars. Oh boy - what if, they say...
For anyone interested in getting a glimpse of how the "other side" thinks and how they process the latest negative evidence against these vaccines, I recommend watching the latest TWIV (This Week In Virology) episode with Dr. Paul Offit. Finally, even the so called "experts" are beginning to discuss things like vaccine-induced myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and immune imprinting.
Thank you Dr. Vanden Bossche. The breathless tone of your writing portrays the frustration of one who spoke truth right from the beginning when no one was listening. Evil people are still in control, but many people are opening their eyes to your warnings. God bless you.
The elephant in the room is viral testing, which is frankly fraudulent, because virology is a fraudulent self-contradictory mess. If the tests were made properly, they wouldn't detect anything. Any call for new vaccines (chemical weapons), never proven to be preventive of anything harmful, is unjustified and evil! There are things which vaccines can prevent: good healthy, progeny, and even staying alive, which the far more toxic C19 vaccines made far more obvious. It is hardly surprising that people are more likely to get ill after having a toxic drug cocktail injected inside the body!
Dr. Vanden Bossche: The researchers said , Taken together, these results demonstrate that new recombinant sarbecoviruses may pose a threat to current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.’
They did not mis-speak. They mean what they say. Their funding and their concern is with the vaccines, not with public health. Their job is to cause, not prevent, the calamitous public health event you warn of. The vaccines exist as a bioweapon to harm public health. That was always their purpose and continues to be their purpose. Profit was only a secondary motive.
Dear Dr. Vanden Bossche I have been following your work since you started and have immense respect and gratitude for all you efforts. I am concerned about the findings by La Quinta Columna and others of nanotechnology in the shots and their interaction with 5G. Again I ask you if you have any thoughts on this subject.
Can I ask to both, me and a gentleman called berger_les_photons all of a sudden changing names in photons shepherd, ban us from Geert’s site even from Substack, for the sake of truth I’m ready to sacrifice myself, gentleman exposed himself dozens of times as a GVB hater, Substack intoxicating and perverting messages and a troll in disguise working for or defending the dark side(s) of the global predators, thanks and people loyal to this site keep up the faith.
The bedrock truth is that, except in the old Star Trek, vaccines are not weapons or cures in the midst of an outbreak - especially non-sterilizing vaccines. To mix in another metaphor, vaccines have become like Wiley Coyote going after the Roadrunner. An endless, very profitable tragic comedy of chasing of variants - until as Geert fears, the unvaccinated ("vaccine-free" is a better term) will be calling out "Bring out your dead" as they drive rickety carts, a la Monty Python through the streets after the mega-variant sweeps across the land while the oligarchs wait it out in bunkers.
Thank you Geert. Please keep writing. One thing that I am still confused about is the near-universal position that viruses always become more transmissible, but less virulent, as time goes on. You say that that is not always the case and viruses can maintain high transmissibility and still become more virulent. It does seem that it would not be a big jump if a new variant remained highly transmissible like Omicron and yet was able to infect the lower respiratory tract like Delta.
So I guess one could say that the C-19 shots immunize you against achieving full immunity, but not against the virus itself.
The answer to your question Geert, is No. I know I deserve an A+ for that answer. They just want the same results- the same 90trillion dollars. Oh boy - what if, they say...
Thank you for the exposure!
For anyone interested in getting a glimpse of how the "other side" thinks and how they process the latest negative evidence against these vaccines, I recommend watching the latest TWIV (This Week In Virology) episode with Dr. Paul Offit. Finally, even the so called "experts" are beginning to discuss things like vaccine-induced myocarditis, original antigenic sin, and immune imprinting.
Thank you Dr. Vanden Bossche. The breathless tone of your writing portrays the frustration of one who spoke truth right from the beginning when no one was listening. Evil people are still in control, but many people are opening their eyes to your warnings. God bless you.
I do not give a hoot about bats. The medical psychopaths criminals like Fauci must stop playing with viruses in American, China and Ukrainian labs ! 🥶
The elephant in the room is viral testing, which is frankly fraudulent, because virology is a fraudulent self-contradictory mess. If the tests were made properly, they wouldn't detect anything. Any call for new vaccines (chemical weapons), never proven to be preventive of anything harmful, is unjustified and evil! There are things which vaccines can prevent: good healthy, progeny, and even staying alive, which the far more toxic C19 vaccines made far more obvious. It is hardly surprising that people are more likely to get ill after having a toxic drug cocktail injected inside the body!
Dr. Vanden Bossche: The researchers said , Taken together, these results demonstrate that new recombinant sarbecoviruses may pose a threat to current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.’
They did not mis-speak. They mean what they say. Their funding and their concern is with the vaccines, not with public health. Their job is to cause, not prevent, the calamitous public health event you warn of. The vaccines exist as a bioweapon to harm public health. That was always their purpose and continues to be their purpose. Profit was only a secondary motive.
Dear Dr. Vanden Bossche I have been following your work since you started and have immense respect and gratitude for all you efforts. I am concerned about the findings by La Quinta Columna and others of nanotechnology in the shots and their interaction with 5G. Again I ask you if you have any thoughts on this subject.
The “shepherd” stereotype....
1. Ask the question and never move 1 inch from the question, no matter the answer. Proof and evidence cannot touch the question
react like a berserk when even 1 dare to go away from the question.
2. Deny all hate speech even with plenty of evidences, instead ask what you mean with the obvious hate
3. When asked to give proof in other substack or sites about a not negative comment, but positive older than 6 months ago, go in denial and oblivion
4. Deny being a fraud with plenty of evidence
5. Use smear and throw vitriol on everyone questioning your authenticity, even with loads of evidence that you are just a copycat
Of course I don’t have to call names everyone knows it’s the “good” shepherd
It won't matter when this happens.....
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/psyop-22-update-australia-bill-opens?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=400535&post_id=76673039&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
and
https://sheldonyakiwchuk.substack.com/p/heading-to-very-dark-places?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=447842&post_id=76650895&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
Can I ask to both, me and a gentleman called berger_les_photons all of a sudden changing names in photons shepherd, ban us from Geert’s site even from Substack, for the sake of truth I’m ready to sacrifice myself, gentleman exposed himself dozens of times as a GVB hater, Substack intoxicating and perverting messages and a troll in disguise working for or defending the dark side(s) of the global predators, thanks and people loyal to this site keep up the faith.
The bedrock truth is that, except in the old Star Trek, vaccines are not weapons or cures in the midst of an outbreak - especially non-sterilizing vaccines. To mix in another metaphor, vaccines have become like Wiley Coyote going after the Roadrunner. An endless, very profitable tragic comedy of chasing of variants - until as Geert fears, the unvaccinated ("vaccine-free" is a better term) will be calling out "Bring out your dead" as they drive rickety carts, a la Monty Python through the streets after the mega-variant sweeps across the land while the oligarchs wait it out in bunkers.
What about this ?
A NEW STUDY SHOWING LUNGS AGE ~15 YEARS POST-COVID. SPED EXPLAINS THE FINDING.
https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/a-new-study-showing-lungs-age-15?utm_medium=reader2
Thank you for your answer and for your honesty and integrity…. This concept seems to be lacking these days .
Thank you Geert. Please keep writing. One thing that I am still confused about is the near-universal position that viruses always become more transmissible, but less virulent, as time goes on. You say that that is not always the case and viruses can maintain high transmissibility and still become more virulent. It does seem that it would not be a big jump if a new variant remained highly transmissible like Omicron and yet was able to infect the lower respiratory tract like Delta.
Your integrity and compassion is greatly appreciated!