Introduction: The study referred to in the link below proposes the use of yellow fever as viral vector for an updated S-based Covid-19 vaccine (YF-SO*) to illustrate that “adaptation” of first generation COVID-19 vaccines could allow C-19 vaccines to stay ahead of the virus.
Anything to do with spike if I understand the science is a flawed route to go down, one really needs to get a grip with these scientists who one minute are saying 8 mice tested and bivalent vaccine is good to go, now a cooks brew of Yellow fever, again and again we see the shortness of time in these claims of the next good thing, admire the experiments seeking to find the right pathway, just give some real time to view the evidence PLEASE.
Seems to me that it's more important for the powers-that-be to promote and use vaccines and medications that are toxic and useless. There are a handful of medications and antioxidants available that actually help people. Forget the experimental stuff on this end. It makes perfect sense to me to use medical therapies that actually have a proven track record to administer.
How we forget the spike is the bugger that gets in to the nucleus of a cell , breaks through brain barriers gets into your heart, ovaries , kidney now a mixed attempt to put more in yet another failed time trial, time being so deficient on all these studies, just ask the 8 mice responcible for the bivalent vaccine being approved another concoction of spike, UNDERSTAND spike is not the way , I get that why can not these special scientists.
What could go possibly wrong by adding a spike to what is widely known as one of the worst vaccines to take as yellow fever.
There seems to be a compulsive obsession in getting everyone jabbed up to the hilt, even those who are not at risk. Not content with the usual childhood vaccines they’ve pushed covid and now flu jabs full throttle when neither is needed, parents stand up and protect your children from the ever growing profiteering racket known as big pharma, they do not care about the wreckage or carnage they have and are still causing.
I never fully understand Geerts prognosis on these complex issues.
He seems to have some respect for the capacity of the current vaccines to prevent severe infections, although I don't see it in the real world data , but he thinks vaccination will continue to drive evolution of immune escape variants. Does that really matter if he believes they are still protected, or is he suggesting we are on the cusp of something quite destructive, vaccinated, or not?
Thanks for your analysis. Reading stuff like this continues helping me grow in my ability and awareness of how to look at studies.
The insistence on finding more ways to continue injecting an otherwise disinterested {mostly} population with new, shiny products {that draw their interest} is getting tiresome, to say the least.
I wish more people would wake up and see it all for what it is. Two weeks to flatten the curve has become a lifetime, apparently, of the latest every six monthly injections.
Geert, was this a mistake or is this now your view? You wrote: "It has, indeed, become obvious that C-19 vaccines still protect vaccinees from severe C-19 disease (and even from C-19 disease altogether),"
it appears one way or the other, all these vaccines aim to inject more Spike Protein into us, and turn our bodies into factories to produce more Spike Protein.
Why is that?? What is so good about Spike Protein ??
before covid, i never heard of Spike Protein, but now it appears is all about it.
Two things stood out to me while perusing the article
1. The research was funded in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
2. The introduction describes SARS-CoV2 as a zoonosis. No REAL evidence for this claim was presented. It was also stated that the pandemic likely occurred from a spillover event. The authors failed to suggest that the spillover event may well have occurred at a coronavirus lab.
Looks like the “scientists” were not too concerned about credible evidence from the start. No wonder Geert was able to poke so many holes in this flawed pie-in-the-sky research.
Genuine question - how does this stack up against the admission by the Pfizer Director to the EU where she stated that the jab was never tested for the transmission of the disease?
Wake up…vaccines have been a CDC for power and profit scam for nearly 50 years.
“The Return of the Microbes” Part 3 - The Aging Viking
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/the-return-of-the-microbes-part-3
Anything to do with spike if I understand the science is a flawed route to go down, one really needs to get a grip with these scientists who one minute are saying 8 mice tested and bivalent vaccine is good to go, now a cooks brew of Yellow fever, again and again we see the shortness of time in these claims of the next good thing, admire the experiments seeking to find the right pathway, just give some real time to view the evidence PLEASE.
Seems to me that it's more important for the powers-that-be to promote and use vaccines and medications that are toxic and useless. There are a handful of medications and antioxidants available that actually help people. Forget the experimental stuff on this end. It makes perfect sense to me to use medical therapies that actually have a proven track record to administer.
How we forget the spike is the bugger that gets in to the nucleus of a cell , breaks through brain barriers gets into your heart, ovaries , kidney now a mixed attempt to put more in yet another failed time trial, time being so deficient on all these studies, just ask the 8 mice responcible for the bivalent vaccine being approved another concoction of spike, UNDERSTAND spike is not the way , I get that why can not these special scientists.
What could go possibly wrong by adding a spike to what is widely known as one of the worst vaccines to take as yellow fever.
There seems to be a compulsive obsession in getting everyone jabbed up to the hilt, even those who are not at risk. Not content with the usual childhood vaccines they’ve pushed covid and now flu jabs full throttle when neither is needed, parents stand up and protect your children from the ever growing profiteering racket known as big pharma, they do not care about the wreckage or carnage they have and are still causing.
Thanks for sharing such important information from these bogus papers Dr Bossche outstanding analysis
I never fully understand Geerts prognosis on these complex issues.
He seems to have some respect for the capacity of the current vaccines to prevent severe infections, although I don't see it in the real world data , but he thinks vaccination will continue to drive evolution of immune escape variants. Does that really matter if he believes they are still protected, or is he suggesting we are on the cusp of something quite destructive, vaccinated, or not?
Thanks for your analysis. Reading stuff like this continues helping me grow in my ability and awareness of how to look at studies.
The insistence on finding more ways to continue injecting an otherwise disinterested {mostly} population with new, shiny products {that draw their interest} is getting tiresome, to say the least.
I wish more people would wake up and see it all for what it is. Two weeks to flatten the curve has become a lifetime, apparently, of the latest every six monthly injections.
Geert, was this a mistake or is this now your view? You wrote: "It has, indeed, become obvious that C-19 vaccines still protect vaccinees from severe C-19 disease (and even from C-19 disease altogether),"
Let’s just keep advocating jabs to pregnant women, really?!!
it appears one way or the other, all these vaccines aim to inject more Spike Protein into us, and turn our bodies into factories to produce more Spike Protein.
Why is that?? What is so good about Spike Protein ??
before covid, i never heard of Spike Protein, but now it appears is all about it.
Thank you for the analysis.
Two things stood out to me while perusing the article
1. The research was funded in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
2. The introduction describes SARS-CoV2 as a zoonosis. No REAL evidence for this claim was presented. It was also stated that the pandemic likely occurred from a spillover event. The authors failed to suggest that the spillover event may well have occurred at a coronavirus lab.
Looks like the “scientists” were not too concerned about credible evidence from the start. No wonder Geert was able to poke so many holes in this flawed pie-in-the-sky research.
Genuine question - how does this stack up against the admission by the Pfizer Director to the EU where she stated that the jab was never tested for the transmission of the disease?
Short version of Geert’s lengthy and scholarly article is - the original toxxx shots and the “ updated “ omicron toxxx shots are both Garbage.
Don’t fall for any of these biased studies.
Hmmmm ... lack of adequate controls. 🎯....shameful and shameless.
How do we put an end to this bs "research"?