36 Comments

The jabbed are immunocompromised...keep watching the side effects and the inability to mount an immune response .

Expand full comment

This is precisely what we see happening in my mother in law. We noticed her inability to mount an immune response and recover after her covid illness. I wrote a post about her story.

Expand full comment

All kinds of faulty immune responses ! Maiming and death , will continue .

Expand full comment

I am trying to get a handle on shedding that might be occurring. Is that a threat?

Expand full comment

I believe so , but eat well, exercise and vitamins , Autophagy, Flccc guidelines . I just can’t live in fear or in a bubble .

Expand full comment

Excellent-thanks!

Expand full comment

Not a treat if you treat with preventively. For example, Natokinasse is very good in this matter. I am talking from personal experience.

Expand full comment

and how many times a jabbed person gets Covid...

Expand full comment

Sanity from Dr Geert , out of all the misinformed would be could be experts WHO deny the clarity of his wisdom

Expand full comment

What Dr.Geert predicted about the vaccinated getting severly sick I believe it's already happening. I see it in my own family: my mother in law who's 85 years old is still very sick after two months of having covid. This time she's not recovering. She's triple vaccinated and also had covid last summer and it was nothing to her back than: after a week she was fine and her covid was mild. What we see this time is something very different. Not only she can't recover like last time but now there are strange symptoms happening to her: swollen legs, a sudden rash, and many others. Every time in the past she was sick with anything she always recovered. This time is different.

Expand full comment

So sorry to hear this. Are you familiar with the Flccc protocols I hope? Just Google Flccc.

Prayers for your mama. ❤

Expand full comment

Thank you Lisa. I tried many things. The biggest mistake we did was not to put her on the early treatment protocol imediately. We waited too long. I also had a hard time to convince my family in the beginning that we must put her on a agresiv treatment protocol for covid. I was told, oh let's try less capsules because I don't think she's going to take so many. Having healed myself, my family and even a friend from covid I know exactly what it takes to get out of it. Most people still believe that covid is nothing but a flu. That's not true. I wish it was.

Expand full comment

When nature begins to bring the infection back to baseline, it’s going to happen rapidly. Everyone, even the “experts” will be caught off guard by the devastating effects. God have mercy.

Expand full comment

.

The Vaccinated Are To Be Judged By The Sickness

Of Their Behavior In Society Among Us.

Their Physical Suffering Is Not The Issue.

Their Own Government

Used Their Own Minds Against Them.

If You're Not On That

Your Own Government

Will Use Them Against You.

.

Expand full comment

Thanks Dr. GVB. I actually binge watched tour 10 part series. So relevant.

Expand full comment

Thank you Geert. The jabbed spread and drove the mutations. Blinded by pride I guess.

Expand full comment

Blinded by liars.

Expand full comment

Thanks for including this important information Dr Bossche much appreciated and timely

Expand full comment

In my opinion, there is more than adequate evidence that natural infection provides the best immunity short term and long term (for C19 and in general). All I was saying was that for the UK all-cause mortality rate data stratified by age and by number of vaccine doses for Jan, Feb, Mar, April and May for 2022 indicated that in the under 60, the third dose restored mortality to that of the unvax while it did not in the 60+. HOWEVER, the all-cause mortality for all ages Jan to May 2022 was still about 10 fold higher in the vax over the unvax, the C19 mortality was about 4 times higher, and the non-C19 was 11 fold higher. These findings make sense because about 95% of the deaths were in the 60 plus group. It is noteworthy that the highest risk was the toxicity of the vaccine and NOT C19 at 90 % of the deaths (10 fold higher risk). In addition, the data also demonstrates that the younger are better able to withstand the toxicity of the C19 vaccine causing death which again makes sense. As you say, the boosted ones are worse off than the unboosted due to vaccine extreme toxicity!!!

Expand full comment
author

One should not mix up adverse site effects of the vaccine with severe C--19 disease caused by a more virulent variant9 that spreads following immune selection pressure. Whereas the first currently prevail, severe C-19 disease is going to prevail once high virulent variants start to circulate. In addition, enhanced viral clearance may render currently circulating virus undetectable at peripheral mucosal barriers and lead to false negative results. At this point in the pandemic,, assays that can detect systemically circulating virus in the blood may be more relevant.

Expand full comment

Bull FU king shit. No more deadly than any original virus. 0.003%

WAKE the fuck up

Expand full comment

What about the effects of shedding?

Expand full comment

Can't remember which of my trusted sources said this, but the harmful products of injection can apparently be spread via semen and in some cases just by exhaling.

Expand full comment

Some have claimed that the conversion of spike-specific IgG1 and IgG3 to IgG4 (a type of tolerance induction of adaptive immunity) causes the loss of innate immunity. This is NOT true. As explained elsewhere [https://hervk102.substack.com/p/is-the-conversion-of-igg13-to-igg4], IgG4 cannot mediate ADE so now ADE mediated loss of critical trained innate immunity (involving protector HERV-K102 particle production in foamy macrophages) stops. In most people under the age of 60, this results in full re-establishment of innate immunity without ADE mediated enhancement of host infection (rates of mortality are the same as unvaccinated). In older adults (some with immunosenescence (co-morbidities)), while the rates of morbidity are certainly less after 3 shots than one or two, there is still a higher risk over the unvaccinated. I would suggest that the unvaccinated likely have less incidence of co-morbidities so this "healthy cohort" bias makes it look like the vaccine makes things worse. NO it is just that without ADE you can now see the effects of immunosenescence in the older age groups. It is hard to fathom that Mother Nature has this built in protection mechanism against inappropriate vaccines/adaptive immune responses i.e., against IgG1/IgG3 responses causing ADE.

Expand full comment

Just taking notice of the Cleveland Study, an eye opener and a contradiction that 3 vaccines would have been safer than 2, as a matter of fact none would have been the best, please do the study I also am sceptic but the truth is the truth.

Expand full comment

Agreed that no vax is the best option. I found the data in that article to be unreliable. If you look at the plot by propensity to be tested, for the high propensity there is no real difference in the up-to-date and not-up-to-date. Testing was not on a regular basis and so I would not put a lot of confidence in the significance. So if anything there probably was NO real difference (average/mean age well under 60) like I said in my substack article.

Expand full comment

Meryl Nass and Jessica Rose are good enough reliable to me for their explaining, why this study would be rejected and debunked immediately for the reasons you just mentioned, it was predictable and it did not diminish my confidence in the significance of this minor but important outcome.

Expand full comment

Dr. Laderoute, there is no way to deny reality: the vaccinated ones, especially those that took the booster shots are in trouble. All of them? No. But too many of them. If I personally know so many who have serious health issues after taking these " life saving shots" you can say whatever you want. But if others are seeing what I see nobody is going to believe you. You stand no chance against the cruel truth that the boosted ones are way worse off than the unvaccinated people. The unvaccinated people seems to do remarkably well. Why do you think that the government doesn't want to tell us how many vaccinated people end up in the hospital? Let me guess: because the data it's not in their favor anymore.

Expand full comment

That's not what I have been seeing around me. This is what I see: that the vaccinated ones, especially the triple vaccinated people, are so much worse off from health point of view than the unvaccinated one. Not only they get infected with covid again and again, but they also have all sorts of health issues some more serious than others. I also have family members that have been diagnosed with cancer after taking the booster shot. Nobody that I know personally, has any health issues that are related to the vaccine side effects or cancer. I also noticed that the unvaccinated are not getting infected with covid since last summer. I really don't know how it is possible to make such claim that the unvaccinated people are not better off. The reality tells me that they are the better off group. In this group not everyone is supper healthy or fit. And despite this, they aren't dealing with the horrible health problems that I have seen in the vaccinated people. It's just horrible seeing how much they suffer just because they trusted their evil government who lied to them

This so called vaccines does make things worse, much worse. But until it happens to you personally, you will continue to believe that these dangerous shots are " safe and effective". My best friend believed the same until she ended up in the hospital after taking the famous booster shot. And you know what's ironic? She has no comorbidities. She was never supposed to end up in the hospital. And she's not the only one I know about. My brother and n law almost died after his first shot! This is the greatest lie ever. What shocks me the most is how doctors fell for this manipulation and propaganda. I highly recommend you study propaganda: how it's done, and how easily people can be fooled when it's done by professionals.

Expand full comment

Yes it is very clear and undeniable that the COVID-19 vaccines were NEVER safe nor effective. Moreover the spike protein in the vaccines is extremely toxic, and causes immunosenescence (dysfunctional macrophages), making the host at much higher risk of any infection and chronic diseases. In some the inadvertent injection into a vein caused clotting most commonly pulmonary emboli especially in older women. In younger men it was myo/pericarditis. In the UK for the mortality rate ratios of VAXED to Unvaxred: for C19 deaths peaked in Feb 2022 (at 4.26 fold higher death rates in vaxed) and then again in Nov 2022 (at 4.38 fold). For non-C19 it peaked in July 2021 (at 7.16 fold) and again Jan 2022 (at 13.38 fold) and for all-cause mortality it peaked Jan 2022 (at 11.04 fold) and April 2022 (at 10.31 fold). According to the all-cause mortality test, the risks far outweighed any benefits for the entire duration of the immunization campaign except for February 2021 (when 95% of the elder patients mostly 70 and up) had had only one shot. It is very clear from the UK data that the C19 vaccines should have been taken off the market by the first week in February 2021.

Expand full comment

Sorry 'rates of morbidity' should say rates of MORTALITY ARE CERTAINLY LESS...

Expand full comment

Your analysis is completely full of inaccuracies and conjecture.

Vax apologist.

Expand full comment

With a bivalent vaccine one might expect IgG1/IgG3 to the newer epitopes which also then get replaced with IgG4 upon subsequent boosters. So it is possible there would be ADE with increased transmission over the short term but which may even out over the longer term due to conversion to IgG4. See previous remarks on the reliability of the data.

Expand full comment

Some people had five shots

Expand full comment