Video: www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org International group of experts discussing the current challenges with the pandemic and looking for additional solutions for the future. Do we need a greater variety of vaccines to stop the pandemic? What new vaccine options are available or in development?
Magnificent. Just when I thought I had a great understanding of it all, you all surprise me again with new and important information. A gracious thank you to you Geert and all the panelists and host.
“ In 2005, Drs. Weissman and Kariko discovered a way to protect foreign mRNA from the body’s immune system. That scientific milestone would be key to the advancement of the mRNA vaccines in 2020.”
My question is did the vaccine companies use synthetic 1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl (Ψ)? And if so.
Couldn’t the current vaccines be re-engineered to reboot the innate immune system by reversing what the inventors did using again uridine rather than synthetic 1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl (Ψ)—which could have been done for those most vulnerable in the first place had the future been known through long term studies. Instead it seems now that the current solutions are ouroborean the head is swallowing the tail. In simple terms SarsCov2 reveals both itself (the head) through the vaccine (the tail). It’s also a TLR virus. Which might account for why those with natural immunity who have recovered might still be vulnerable. And due to rapid vaccination programs Time is accelerated. Don’t most side effects reveal the same problems caused by shutting or truncating in the Toll Like Receptors as at minimal -relational? Even the recovered would have potential future issues if even a minimal issue with TLR’s exist.
So? In regards to NK cells-a study which includes uridine which you probably have memorized but this stood out.
“The importance of uridine incorporation as an innate immune response is made clear by the fact that a wide range of viruses encode mechanisms to avoid it35. In addition, HIV-1 recruits UNG2 to virions, which has been reported to enhance viral infectivity by limiting dUTP misincorporation during reverse transcription36 and to excise uridines resulting from A3G-editing37. Thus, there may be multiple routes through which HIV limits uridine incorporation.”
So I best wander back to the world where my own innate intelligence belongs. Bless you Dr. Vanden Bossche.
Magnificent. Just when I thought I had a great understanding of it all, you all surprise me again with new and important information. A gracious thank you to you Geert and all the panelists and host.
Loved it. Thank you Dr Vanden Bossche!
Absolutely brilliant discussion. I learned so much. Thank you for sharing this.
Dear Dr. Vanden Bossche,
It seems that the adaptive egos of the world have near overthrown aperson such as you who is still connected to his innate human intelligence.
So I read this enlightening article:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/index.php/article/stabilising-the-code
“ In 2005, Drs. Weissman and Kariko discovered a way to protect foreign mRNA from the body’s immune system. That scientific milestone would be key to the advancement of the mRNA vaccines in 2020.”
My question is did the vaccine companies use synthetic 1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl (Ψ)? And if so.
Couldn’t the current vaccines be re-engineered to reboot the innate immune system by reversing what the inventors did using again uridine rather than synthetic 1-methyl-3'-pseudouridylyl (Ψ)—which could have been done for those most vulnerable in the first place had the future been known through long term studies. Instead it seems now that the current solutions are ouroborean the head is swallowing the tail. In simple terms SarsCov2 reveals both itself (the head) through the vaccine (the tail). It’s also a TLR virus. Which might account for why those with natural immunity who have recovered might still be vulnerable. And due to rapid vaccination programs Time is accelerated. Don’t most side effects reveal the same problems caused by shutting or truncating in the Toll Like Receptors as at minimal -relational? Even the recovered would have potential future issues if even a minimal issue with TLR’s exist.
So? In regards to NK cells-a study which includes uridine which you probably have memorized but this stood out.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3530928/#!po=0.581395
“The importance of uridine incorporation as an innate immune response is made clear by the fact that a wide range of viruses encode mechanisms to avoid it35. In addition, HIV-1 recruits UNG2 to virions, which has been reported to enhance viral infectivity by limiting dUTP misincorporation during reverse transcription36 and to excise uridines resulting from A3G-editing37. Thus, there may be multiple routes through which HIV limits uridine incorporation.”
So I best wander back to the world where my own innate intelligence belongs. Bless you Dr. Vanden Bossche.
Wow. Watching right away!