This publication (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/21645515.2025.2547517?needAccess=true) once again illustrates how dangerous a tool science becomes when placed in the hands of narrowly trained scientists.
Thank you mr. Geert. I always try to read and understand what you publish. But it is very often to difficult to grasp for me. Nevertheless, I keep on trying. Many thanks and many cordial regards to you and your family.
They are dying now. I saw a report where last year 700,000 young people being 16 to 45 years of age died and that is 2/3 more than the yearly average. Sorry I can't give you the address on the article I saw but it should be easy to ask chat GPT for figures and averages of yearly deaths pre and post vaccinations
When you read these sorts of analysis and hypothesis, it’s all educated guess work which may be useful for working towards a solution. But the more of this I see the more I feel the whole vaccine enterprise for 300 years has been and continues to be a trial and error exercise, no one ever knows how things are going to go for certain. This is totally different than what we have been led to believe for generations that vaccines are the most studied, safest, most effective most understood products in healthcare. Nothing could be further from the truth, imagine maintaining that the “science” is settled. It’s straight faith in an ideology - complete religion. Will never trust this field of study again.
Too much emphasis is placed on serum antibodies by scientists. Serum antibodies are adaptive/reactive only, and provide no real protection against infections. The real protection is cellular. Inducing serum antibody production with shots can destroy the cellular protection. https://rumble.com/v3tgshv-where-is-the-protection-of-infection.html
Too many people just leaned laboratory techniques without basic research training. Under white lab coats you'll find a wide spectrum of so-called "scientists".
Trying to vindicate the vaccine and characterize IgG class switching as no big deal, is all part of the plan. It's all about providing papers and "proof" to the shot-pushers (AAP, anyone?)
All goes great until GVB tears it to shreds. They have no idea what they're doing. They can't draw any of their vaunted conclusions from the case data because it doesn't show the immune refocusing and ADED that result from the very shots and boosters they love so much.
Geert, I understood about 30% of this, but, how could ANYONE argue with you? How would they dare??? Thank you for keeping watch on the uneducated nonsense that is appearing 😌
A "report" title well cooked to deceive. A report well cooked to deceive also citing sources well cooked to deceive. "Well cooked" - truely what I have learned to expect from "them".
Particularly when the large to very large immune system shift to production of IgG4 class antibodies is otherwise reported, by sources I have found to be creditable, to be one of the mRNA injection's great dangers and an example of failure to do longer term testing of mRNA injection before the forced mass injection campaign.
From what I have read on substacks and heard on selected youtube channels, I understand IgG4 attaches to and "marks" the newly introduced pathogen and may also attach to and mark formerly controlled or emerging cancers and thereby tells the immune system to tolerate this / leave it alone / do not attack this - resulting in pathogen persistence or uncontrolled pathogen growth or uncontrolled cancers / hyper progressive cancer / turbo cancer.
This alarming immune system shift is reported to particularly be seen in those previously uninfected with covid prior to injection of the first "booster" dose after the initial 2 mRNA injections.
I also do not believe this below from "their" Abstract. Not one bit.
"A two-dose regimen of the original COVID-19 mRNA vaccines conferred approximately 89–98% effectiveness against infection with the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH-1) variant, but significantly lower protection (40–75% efficacy) against the Omicron BA.1 variant. Additional booster immunizations have been shown to enhance immune protection, with >97% effectiveness against severe disease caused by WH-1 and ~ 67% vaccine effectiveness against Omicron BA.1 after a third dose."
"they" have sold their souls, if they ever even had a soul. "they" believe in getting paid and deliver, to specification, whatever pays.
Dr Paul Marik "If you think about it. The pharmaceutical companies design the study and they design it for whatever outcome they want. They then conduct the study and conduct it in a way that it will give them the outcome. They then evaluate the outcome so that they get the outcome they want. They analyze the data so it creates the outcome they want and then they get ghost writers to write the paper producing the outcome they want. It's a completely bogus system and till there is more transparency and we change the way clinical studies are done - Unfortunately, I don't think you can really believe anything you read."
Dr Paul Marik at 49:20 into the video "Epidemic of Fraud: Exposing Hydroxychloroquine Censorship" Independent Medical Alliance (Formerly FLCCC Alliance)
What is a vaccine break through infection? How can there be any such thing? A vaccine is simply a vaccine. It’s not a breakthrough infection. Administering the vaccine is the breakthrough part. To prevent a vaccine breaking through, you don’t get a vaccine.
"...how dangerous a tool science becomes when placed in the hands of narrowly trained scientists." Scary how far reductionist science has moved from understanding the whole of things.
Thank you mr. Geert. I always try to read and understand what you publish. But it is very often to difficult to grasp for me. Nevertheless, I keep on trying. Many thanks and many cordial regards to you and your family.
Copy the text and put it into ChatGPT - Ask for an easily understandable summary of the text with essential core points!
They are dying now. I saw a report where last year 700,000 young people being 16 to 45 years of age died and that is 2/3 more than the yearly average. Sorry I can't give you the address on the article I saw but it should be easy to ask chat GPT for figures and averages of yearly deaths pre and post vaccinations
They are dying now
When you read these sorts of analysis and hypothesis, it’s all educated guess work which may be useful for working towards a solution. But the more of this I see the more I feel the whole vaccine enterprise for 300 years has been and continues to be a trial and error exercise, no one ever knows how things are going to go for certain. This is totally different than what we have been led to believe for generations that vaccines are the most studied, safest, most effective most understood products in healthcare. Nothing could be further from the truth, imagine maintaining that the “science” is settled. It’s straight faith in an ideology - complete religion. Will never trust this field of study again.
Too much emphasis is placed on serum antibodies by scientists. Serum antibodies are adaptive/reactive only, and provide no real protection against infections. The real protection is cellular. Inducing serum antibody production with shots can destroy the cellular protection. https://rumble.com/v3tgshv-where-is-the-protection-of-infection.html
Thanks once again for this Timely Update and Analysis Dr Bossche 🙏
Too many people just leaned laboratory techniques without basic research training. Under white lab coats you'll find a wide spectrum of so-called "scientists".
Trying to vindicate the vaccine and characterize IgG class switching as no big deal, is all part of the plan. It's all about providing papers and "proof" to the shot-pushers (AAP, anyone?)
All goes great until GVB tears it to shreds. They have no idea what they're doing. They can't draw any of their vaunted conclusions from the case data because it doesn't show the immune refocusing and ADED that result from the very shots and boosters they love so much.
Do the 'narrowly-trained scientists' actually experiment..? Or is their time fully occupied with speculation..?
Yes
Geert, I understood about 30% of this, but, how could ANYONE argue with you? How would they dare??? Thank you for keeping watch on the uneducated nonsense that is appearing 😌
A "report" title well cooked to deceive. A report well cooked to deceive also citing sources well cooked to deceive. "Well cooked" - truely what I have learned to expect from "them".
Particularly when the large to very large immune system shift to production of IgG4 class antibodies is otherwise reported, by sources I have found to be creditable, to be one of the mRNA injection's great dangers and an example of failure to do longer term testing of mRNA injection before the forced mass injection campaign.
From what I have read on substacks and heard on selected youtube channels, I understand IgG4 attaches to and "marks" the newly introduced pathogen and may also attach to and mark formerly controlled or emerging cancers and thereby tells the immune system to tolerate this / leave it alone / do not attack this - resulting in pathogen persistence or uncontrolled pathogen growth or uncontrolled cancers / hyper progressive cancer / turbo cancer.
This alarming immune system shift is reported to particularly be seen in those previously uninfected with covid prior to injection of the first "booster" dose after the initial 2 mRNA injections.
I also do not believe this below from "their" Abstract. Not one bit.
"A two-dose regimen of the original COVID-19 mRNA vaccines conferred approximately 89–98% effectiveness against infection with the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH-1) variant, but significantly lower protection (40–75% efficacy) against the Omicron BA.1 variant. Additional booster immunizations have been shown to enhance immune protection, with >97% effectiveness against severe disease caused by WH-1 and ~ 67% vaccine effectiveness against Omicron BA.1 after a third dose."
Do they believe themselves?
"they" have sold their souls, if they ever even had a soul. "they" believe in getting paid and deliver, to specification, whatever pays.
Dr Paul Marik "If you think about it. The pharmaceutical companies design the study and they design it for whatever outcome they want. They then conduct the study and conduct it in a way that it will give them the outcome. They then evaluate the outcome so that they get the outcome they want. They analyze the data so it creates the outcome they want and then they get ghost writers to write the paper producing the outcome they want. It's a completely bogus system and till there is more transparency and we change the way clinical studies are done - Unfortunately, I don't think you can really believe anything you read."
Dr Paul Marik at 49:20 into the video "Epidemic of Fraud: Exposing Hydroxychloroquine Censorship" Independent Medical Alliance (Formerly FLCCC Alliance)
What is a vaccine break through infection? How can there be any such thing? A vaccine is simply a vaccine. It’s not a breakthrough infection. Administering the vaccine is the breakthrough part. To prevent a vaccine breaking through, you don’t get a vaccine.
please check the definition of ‘vaccine-breakthrough infection’. Txs!
Thanks for this update Dr Bossche
"...how dangerous a tool science becomes when placed in the hands of narrowly trained scientists." Scary how far reductionist science has moved from understanding the whole of things.
PPP leads to PPP