If people start to succumb now to the consequences of their vaccination, the authorities will label it as Disease X or some other condition. They’ve lied long enough now to just keep going.
Everyone is catching this new illness sore throat and runny nose lasting for weeks wether jabbed or unjabbed luckily I haven't caught it I put it down to fasting.
Woe to the governments, to the mainstream media and to the top health agencies who will call this DISEASE X or a new strain of Bird Flu or any other disease, EXCEPT what it actually is.
The sad part is that people die for believing their BS.
When you say "the only possibility for the virus to break..." means that it eventually could not find the way to survive and then to get the endemicity phase???? On the other hand, what is really making that pressure on the virus? The Pnnabs??
Still it seems likely that the hivicron would lose transmission fitness person to person, in being virulent inside the body. Because the JN.1 is so optimally evolved to transmit person to person, it would outcompete the hivicron in transmission.
It was said that the JN.1 is close to the maximum of what is physically possible in transmission fitness person to person. A variant that is both virulent in the body, and the most fit for transmission, seems to be physically impossible, no matter that there would be a selective pressure towards it.
So it still seems to me that there would just be a relatively few cases where the hivicron pops up, affecting a few people. Much as like the bacteria in the hospital that are resistant to all antibiotics.
My understanding is that given the high degree of suboptimal population immune selection pressure, the virus’ is under enormous pressure to find more efficient ways to ensure its survival. This graph is merely a small piece of the puzzle to illustrate that JN-1 clan is dominating the scene and these newer variants don’t have the characateristics to overtake and become dominant players in this evolution….at this point!
I haven’t heard Geert change his view that glycosylation will happen which would relieve (lift) the pNNAbs’ inhibition of severe disease thereby permitting spread of the virus intra(within the susceptible) hosts. This will alleviate the population level immune pressure on the viral lifecycle and in the process restore equilibrium via herd immunity (between human population and virus) and eradication of covid virus (until animal reservoirs begin to come into play)
I am reading Geert's words as perhaps a ray of hope that things may not go as predicted? (which is a good thing) Could JN.1 be strong enough that the other variants will peter out before they have a chance to mutate into a killer strain? It's how I read it~~why is everyone reading it as bad news? That is what I am hoping he has said...wish he had written more.
MY experience (i am NOt vaxxed) is that all the non-vaxxed people are sick, and vaxxed people feel nothing, they do not even notice they are constantly infected! and if they get sick, they resolve to a normal status much much quicker! I am not sure if I ever got well after my 2022 infection, I have had pain in my left shoulder for months now. So I do not believe this is the right division between vaxxed and non vaxxed, since those groups are both SO HETEROGENOUS! it's unbelievable to discern patterns: some are 1x vaxxed, majority 2x, minority 3x, with all the combinations of Adenovax+mRNA etc....i am baffled as to why this doc makes this distinct division when in reality things do not happen like that AT ALL! What happens is the majority are vaxxed, and they are NOT SICK! while those unvaxxed, esp women are often sick, some nonvaxxed have ALREADY DIED! from heart attacks!
Let us check how “serious” is the “science” presented by this chart.
It was freshly published in a pre-print on April 22. Just two days ago. Why was it posted on X? Push marketing.
Geert’s comment takes this chart as a basis for extremely generalized forecast for the whole humanity. Geert assumes the inevitability of the course of the development of the virus based on this chart. How reliable is this forecast?
Yunlong is the last name in a string of 23 (!) authors. “Nature” has called Yunlong the “covid predictor”. So far, the status of covid in the world is such that being called its “predictor” is weird, to say the least. Nobody knows anything, authorities go forth and back, it’s all PR and fake news. Anyway...
The group of 23 authors have produced this cute chart based on a group of 159 persons in SEVEN different cohorts. The smallest cohort was 4 persons (sic!). Translation: the chart (and the whole “study”) is a random mosaic, not a linear and consistent evolution.
WHEN were the samples collected? To produce a reliable “prediction”, you need to have a rigid timeframe. The authors write openly: “Infection strains were inferred based on the sampling time when the corresponding strain was the majority of detected sequences in the region of sample collection”.
Translation: We made our conclusions based on the time when our selected strain was dominant in the particular area. Not in the same time. Randomly. Not defined in time sequence. Randomly.
HOW were the strains identified? According to authors: “SARS-CoV-2 Infection was confirmed by either antigen or PCR tests.” Both these methods have been officially cancelled long ago. Yet... they are useful to create publication-worth papers. The authors do not say a single reliable, verifiable word about methods or materials. Not a word about from where their subjects came. In other word, their paper is completely unreliable.
This does not hold them from drawing a bold conclusion: “...our results... provide compelling evidence to shift the focus of vaccine booster strategies from XBB to the JN.1 lineage. Despite the notable cross-lineage reactivity elicited by XBB as a booster, boosters based on JN.1 may offer superior protection against current and forthcoming JN.1 subvariants...”
Remember, they say it based on random “observation” of 159 persons at a single point in time - all based on their lab-produced results.
They want you to believe that snapshots of 159 random persons (of whom we know nothing) are sufficient to make up long-term, mandatory worldwide healthcare policy for 8 billion people.
Geert, please... at least read such fantasies before making references to them. What the 23 authors produced should have never been allowed to come up even in preprints. Their “study” has zero value in terms of observation. Prediction? Forget.
If people start to succumb now to the consequences of their vaccination, the authorities will label it as Disease X or some other condition. They’ve lied long enough now to just keep going.
Many thanks for this update Dr Bossche
Just had 18 hour's in NHS hospital with aged parent with pneumonia unknown to me she had been given UK spring booster on Friday
Whilst there lots of people on trolleys waiting for Bed's with similar respiratory problems 😓
Everyone is catching this new illness sore throat and runny nose lasting for weeks wether jabbed or unjabbed luckily I haven't caught it I put it down to fasting.
Woe to the governments, to the mainstream media and to the top health agencies who will call this DISEASE X or a new strain of Bird Flu or any other disease, EXCEPT what it actually is.
The sad part is that people die for believing their BS.
This is ought to happen rather soon. Seems like we are in the final stages of the pandemic now.
When you say "the only possibility for the virus to break..." means that it eventually could not find the way to survive and then to get the endemicity phase???? On the other hand, what is really making that pressure on the virus? The Pnnabs??
https://www.creative-proteomics.com/resource/n-linked-glycosylation-vs-o-linked-glycosylation.htm
👍
Still it seems likely that the hivicron would lose transmission fitness person to person, in being virulent inside the body. Because the JN.1 is so optimally evolved to transmit person to person, it would outcompete the hivicron in transmission.
It was said that the JN.1 is close to the maximum of what is physically possible in transmission fitness person to person. A variant that is both virulent in the body, and the most fit for transmission, seems to be physically impossible, no matter that there would be a selective pressure towards it.
So it still seems to me that there would just be a relatively few cases where the hivicron pops up, affecting a few people. Much as like the bacteria in the hospital that are resistant to all antibiotics.
My understanding is that given the high degree of suboptimal population immune selection pressure, the virus’ is under enormous pressure to find more efficient ways to ensure its survival. This graph is merely a small piece of the puzzle to illustrate that JN-1 clan is dominating the scene and these newer variants don’t have the characateristics to overtake and become dominant players in this evolution….at this point!
I haven’t heard Geert change his view that glycosylation will happen which would relieve (lift) the pNNAbs’ inhibition of severe disease thereby permitting spread of the virus intra(within the susceptible) hosts. This will alleviate the population level immune pressure on the viral lifecycle and in the process restore equilibrium via herd immunity (between human population and virus) and eradication of covid virus (until animal reservoirs begin to come into play)
What is the likelihood of this happening? Are you now leaning towards a more virulent strain not happening?
I am reading Geert's words as perhaps a ray of hope that things may not go as predicted? (which is a good thing) Could JN.1 be strong enough that the other variants will peter out before they have a chance to mutate into a killer strain? It's how I read it~~why is everyone reading it as bad news? That is what I am hoping he has said...wish he had written more.
MY experience (i am NOt vaxxed) is that all the non-vaxxed people are sick, and vaxxed people feel nothing, they do not even notice they are constantly infected! and if they get sick, they resolve to a normal status much much quicker! I am not sure if I ever got well after my 2022 infection, I have had pain in my left shoulder for months now. So I do not believe this is the right division between vaxxed and non vaxxed, since those groups are both SO HETEROGENOUS! it's unbelievable to discern patterns: some are 1x vaxxed, majority 2x, minority 3x, with all the combinations of Adenovax+mRNA etc....i am baffled as to why this doc makes this distinct division when in reality things do not happen like that AT ALL! What happens is the majority are vaxxed, and they are NOT SICK! while those unvaxxed, esp women are often sick, some nonvaxxed have ALREADY DIED! from heart attacks!
https://journals.aai.org/jimmunol/article/192/7/2953/108271/Modulation-of-T-Cell-and-Innate-Immune-Responses
About the origin of Covid-19: see the whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan:
https://twitter.com/DrLiMengYAN1/status/1780757477208014919
Let us check how “serious” is the “science” presented by this chart.
It was freshly published in a pre-print on April 22. Just two days ago. Why was it posted on X? Push marketing.
Geert’s comment takes this chart as a basis for extremely generalized forecast for the whole humanity. Geert assumes the inevitability of the course of the development of the virus based on this chart. How reliable is this forecast?
Yunlong is the last name in a string of 23 (!) authors. “Nature” has called Yunlong the “covid predictor”. So far, the status of covid in the world is such that being called its “predictor” is weird, to say the least. Nobody knows anything, authorities go forth and back, it’s all PR and fake news. Anyway...
The group of 23 authors have produced this cute chart based on a group of 159 persons in SEVEN different cohorts. The smallest cohort was 4 persons (sic!). Translation: the chart (and the whole “study”) is a random mosaic, not a linear and consistent evolution.
WHEN were the samples collected? To produce a reliable “prediction”, you need to have a rigid timeframe. The authors write openly: “Infection strains were inferred based on the sampling time when the corresponding strain was the majority of detected sequences in the region of sample collection”.
Translation: We made our conclusions based on the time when our selected strain was dominant in the particular area. Not in the same time. Randomly. Not defined in time sequence. Randomly.
HOW were the strains identified? According to authors: “SARS-CoV-2 Infection was confirmed by either antigen or PCR tests.” Both these methods have been officially cancelled long ago. Yet... they are useful to create publication-worth papers. The authors do not say a single reliable, verifiable word about methods or materials. Not a word about from where their subjects came. In other word, their paper is completely unreliable.
This does not hold them from drawing a bold conclusion: “...our results... provide compelling evidence to shift the focus of vaccine booster strategies from XBB to the JN.1 lineage. Despite the notable cross-lineage reactivity elicited by XBB as a booster, boosters based on JN.1 may offer superior protection against current and forthcoming JN.1 subvariants...”
Remember, they say it based on random “observation” of 159 persons at a single point in time - all based on their lab-produced results.
They want you to believe that snapshots of 159 random persons (of whom we know nothing) are sufficient to make up long-term, mandatory worldwide healthcare policy for 8 billion people.
Geert, please... at least read such fantasies before making references to them. What the 23 authors produced should have never been allowed to come up even in preprints. Their “study” has zero value in terms of observation. Prediction? Forget.
The immunosuppression and ability mount an immune response , is terrible in the jabbed .