In my previous Substack article, ‘When Experts Disagree, Something Bigger Is Being Missed[1],’ I described how linear thinking frequently drives scientists toward erroneous conclusions when attempting to analyze and interpret complex phenomena.
Thank you, Dr. Vanden Bossche. I don’t know enough to judge what you’re saying, but the way you are saying it gives me more faith in you than anyone else I’ve heard opine on this subject to date. I just hope that other scientists and policy makers are at least reading your articles and learning from them, even if reputational and/or financial concerns are preventing them from engaging with you in an open-minded way. I don’t think it is an exaggeration to say that the fate of all of us may depend on our ability to do so.
Had to laugh - I admit I'm sometimes feeling the same at this point. probably because of the inevitability of it all and the fact that I can't do a thing about what's happening. It's like watching a film which you know ends in tragedy but you can't stop watching it -repeatedly!
I guess I’m eternally an optimist, or rather, an “apocalyptimist”. Things do indeed seem hopeless, but I’m reminded of how things regularly seemed that way in the past, and so I don’t want to say for sure we’re all doomed. After the Black Death, things turned out really good. Now I don’t want to say that I know it will with us, but just that I can’t say I know for sure either way. And since being an optimist gives me a 5% greater chance of survival, I’ll stick with that :-)
AI says: "We are not dealing with a failure of intelligence. We are dealing with a failure of integrity, sustained by a system that has made honesty a liability and compliance the only path to survival."
So no amount of scientific argumentation makes a positive difference.
What's also changed is the perception of the phrase "herd immunity". Where it was just a verbal simile it now suggests people are cattle and thus subject to various vaccine mandates.
AI: The Chinese perspective on the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a firm, state-driven commitment to the narrative of viral attenuation. Official discourse from the Chinese National Health Commission and associated research bodies insists that the virus has reached a plateau and is undergoing a process of "natural restriction" or "degeneration" in terms of its virulence and replicative fitness.
In short, the Chinese establishment views the current stage of the pandemic as a settled, managed phenomenon—a virus that has been successfully "domesticated" through a combination of population immunity and its own inherent evolutionary limitations. Any suggestion that this may be a "pseudo-stable" state masking a deeper evolutionary risk is treated as an external, often politically motivated, misinterpretation.
Dear Geert: I hope you and family are well. I think of you and your prescient writing often as it seems of increasing significance to possibly explain what doctors, policy makers, media and grieving families are finding inexplicable.
I care for my 94 year old mom, since Covid mandates eliminated her access to paid help around the family home. Never anti-vax, but knowing something about her and my health history, I avoided getting her or me injected with the novel mRNA, S-protein, LNP and pseudo uridine, to avoid the systemic and Furin cleavage effects.
Mom picked up Covid and I also fell ill for two days in 2024 after I took her to the dentist for teeth cleaning. She then got a tooth infection which they wanted remove under anaesthetic in the hospital to which we said no. I was able to recover her health by restoring nutritional factors. We don’t want her under anesthetic or admitted to hospital. We know two women younger than her who went to hospital because they had sprains after a fall and were told they would have proper scans of admitted briefly, . Given standard meds including blood thinners, one became paraplegic and remains in hospital. The other died after going downhill quickly on standard meds.
As of December, Mom outlived her younger friend and neighbour who was active and more like a mother to me than mom, But the friend has a son who is a top cardiologist, who pushed her to keep up her Pfizer boosters, to wear masks and distance over the last 5 years.
Doing it all and still getting sick highlights how the tech fails to work.
Late 2025, staffing at hospitals dropped a bit as well-vaccinated staff took flu shots and got flu symptoms, but went to work anyways because they had no temperature. Mom’s dear friend got the flu shot, and two weeks later had her blood pressure drop. I took her dinner and we called her son to come by and check on her. He decided to walk her into hospital to get an angiogram and see the top cardiologist in the teaching hospitals. Something wasn’t adding up in conventional ways with her drop in BP… after she had a full medical checkup in September including a heart ultrasound, which showed she was generally well. But after the flu shot, here she was, checked into hospital for major tests. They gave her a standard med cocktail to sleep overnight, and she went into kidney and liver failure.
Doctors recovered her and found by other scan that she needed angioplasty. Next day they put in two stents. She came out of the procedure, happy to see family in ICU and planned to head home in a few days. Sadly she had a heart attack, revived and passed (due to stroke?) that night . That was December.
Since then, several younger neighbours died suddenly.
As I did taxes returns for my mom, and coordinated with her accountant and financial advisor, I found delays as they faced personal challenges, and then so did my circle of vaccinated friends, and colleagues.
Q1-2026: I offer what can be called anecdotal evidence, or a report that is profoundly personal and significant in terms of the degree of anomalous events observed in the context of a vaccinated population of ‘normal’ health, people who ultimately counted as part of a group suffering sudden severe disease or death:
Most recently, the companion of mom’s friend who died, also died in April. He was 101 and remained alive after the vaccines and onset of a ‘rare blood condition’, known as an adverse shot effect, by receiving a complete blood transfusion every other week since early 2022.
On Easter weekend, two friends in their 50s had indigestion. One was having an unexpected heart attack by sudden blockage and survived. Stents were lit in.
The other friend turned out to have advanced ovarian cancer with tumours throughout her abdomen. She’s going in tomorrow for a complete hysterectomy and surgery.
Mom’s financial advisor delayed her annual account review with me for months as she got the flu after having the shot. She also attended 4 funerals of young relatives over 3 months. Two women and two men died suddenly in their 30s-40s. The losses are painful.
One of my friends and two colleagues (3 people) who took the late 2025 flu shot, have now had severe infections ‘requiring’ tooth removal and root canals. Such dental disasters occurred for a second time in life after having the same problem for the first time when they took the first round of double-shot Covid vaccines.
A dear neighbour lost his hunger around holidays, went to the doctor who found stage four colon cancer. And the fellow died within three months.
This year doesn’t seem like a biodefense war against Trump’s hidden enemy so much as a silent homegrown genocide no less censored than news of American-Israeli expansionism in the Middle East. Yet, the vaccines are known in principle and proving in practice to be dangerously powerful immune interventions of unknown effects because one-size-fits-all or ‘safe and effective’ branding of novel vaccines says nothing of the diverse and orescious self-regulatory capacity of recipients.
Dynamic context means a lot if not everything for healthy adaptation, that is life.
You lay it out so well. I am grateful you are there, still lovely and caring to share your insights.
I keep wondering if all of what you and others are describing is just the mark of a peaking civilization. In the US you have the military industrial complex, which absorbs unlimited money supplied by a bought off Congress, to produce weapons that don't work. This institution searches for wars to sustain itself. You have a totally corrupt, vertically integrated monopoly in the pharma-medical complex; scientific research is both generated and also corrupted by this. The US military complex goes back to the end of WWII, and the present state of medicine and related research goes back to Rockefeller at the beggining of the 20th century. Note that the pharma end of the empire will always seek out pandemics just as the military seeks out war. In fact the medical-pharma complex seeks disease in general. Peace and human health will not sustain either of these institutions. The "genocide" may not be so much of intention as it is a result of the innate corruption of these institutions, and indicates a failing civilzation.
I hear what you are saying, and wonder what proportion of people recruited into ‘leading’ institutions, including well-meaning people, explicitly pursue corruption. Few.
There’s a place for conventional medicine. But disease labelling and standards of care have been monopolized by generic disease-based preventive technologies, and further distorted by reliance on logical fallacies (weaponized) to squeeze out knowledge or communication supporting health and the potential for its promotion.
AI: From a skeptical perspective, the persistence of these claims is often a reaction to a medical establishment that has historically been opaque about how it identifies and characterizes pathogens. When institutions rely on complex, abstract genetic sequencing—rather than the simpler, classical methods of isolation and visualization that the public can easily grasp—it creates a vacuum of trust. This void is then filled by those who reject the entire framework of modern virology, leading to the conclusion that if the science isn't communicated in a way that respects classical, observable evidence, then the entity in question must not exist at all.
Thank you, Dr. Vanden Bossche. I don’t know enough to judge what you’re saying, but the way you are saying it gives me more faith in you than anyone else I’ve heard opine on this subject to date. I just hope that other scientists and policy makers are at least reading your articles and learning from them, even if reputational and/or financial concerns are preventing them from engaging with you in an open-minded way. I don’t think it is an exaggeration to say that the fate of all of us may depend on our ability to do so.
How’s this for another slow-kill chain:
1. mRNA vaxx reverse-transcribes
2. you are now a spike factory
3. spike protein toxic to the thymus
4. thymus accelerated decline
5. no more T-cells!
6. good-bye
Oh well
Had to laugh - I admit I'm sometimes feeling the same at this point. probably because of the inevitability of it all and the fact that I can't do a thing about what's happening. It's like watching a film which you know ends in tragedy but you can't stop watching it -repeatedly!
I guess I’m eternally an optimist, or rather, an “apocalyptimist”. Things do indeed seem hopeless, but I’m reminded of how things regularly seemed that way in the past, and so I don’t want to say for sure we’re all doomed. After the Black Death, things turned out really good. Now I don’t want to say that I know it will with us, but just that I can’t say I know for sure either way. And since being an optimist gives me a 5% greater chance of survival, I’ll stick with that :-)
Yes, you're the eternal optimist for sure! Beats being constantly depressed by it all, anyway.
AI says: "We are not dealing with a failure of intelligence. We are dealing with a failure of integrity, sustained by a system that has made honesty a liability and compliance the only path to survival."
So no amount of scientific argumentation makes a positive difference.
What's also changed is the perception of the phrase "herd immunity". Where it was just a verbal simile it now suggests people are cattle and thus subject to various vaccine mandates.
It seems to me that we have linear thinking with blinders on. You can’t see what you don’t want too see.
AI: The Chinese perspective on the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 is characterized by a firm, state-driven commitment to the narrative of viral attenuation. Official discourse from the Chinese National Health Commission and associated research bodies insists that the virus has reached a plateau and is undergoing a process of "natural restriction" or "degeneration" in terms of its virulence and replicative fitness.
In short, the Chinese establishment views the current stage of the pandemic as a settled, managed phenomenon—a virus that has been successfully "domesticated" through a combination of population immunity and its own inherent evolutionary limitations. Any suggestion that this may be a "pseudo-stable" state masking a deeper evolutionary risk is treated as an external, often politically motivated, misinterpretation.
Dear Geert: I hope you and family are well. I think of you and your prescient writing often as it seems of increasing significance to possibly explain what doctors, policy makers, media and grieving families are finding inexplicable.
I care for my 94 year old mom, since Covid mandates eliminated her access to paid help around the family home. Never anti-vax, but knowing something about her and my health history, I avoided getting her or me injected with the novel mRNA, S-protein, LNP and pseudo uridine, to avoid the systemic and Furin cleavage effects.
Mom picked up Covid and I also fell ill for two days in 2024 after I took her to the dentist for teeth cleaning. She then got a tooth infection which they wanted remove under anaesthetic in the hospital to which we said no. I was able to recover her health by restoring nutritional factors. We don’t want her under anesthetic or admitted to hospital. We know two women younger than her who went to hospital because they had sprains after a fall and were told they would have proper scans of admitted briefly, . Given standard meds including blood thinners, one became paraplegic and remains in hospital. The other died after going downhill quickly on standard meds.
As of December, Mom outlived her younger friend and neighbour who was active and more like a mother to me than mom, But the friend has a son who is a top cardiologist, who pushed her to keep up her Pfizer boosters, to wear masks and distance over the last 5 years.
Doing it all and still getting sick highlights how the tech fails to work.
Late 2025, staffing at hospitals dropped a bit as well-vaccinated staff took flu shots and got flu symptoms, but went to work anyways because they had no temperature. Mom’s dear friend got the flu shot, and two weeks later had her blood pressure drop. I took her dinner and we called her son to come by and check on her. He decided to walk her into hospital to get an angiogram and see the top cardiologist in the teaching hospitals. Something wasn’t adding up in conventional ways with her drop in BP… after she had a full medical checkup in September including a heart ultrasound, which showed she was generally well. But after the flu shot, here she was, checked into hospital for major tests. They gave her a standard med cocktail to sleep overnight, and she went into kidney and liver failure.
Doctors recovered her and found by other scan that she needed angioplasty. Next day they put in two stents. She came out of the procedure, happy to see family in ICU and planned to head home in a few days. Sadly she had a heart attack, revived and passed (due to stroke?) that night . That was December.
Since then, several younger neighbours died suddenly.
As I did taxes returns for my mom, and coordinated with her accountant and financial advisor, I found delays as they faced personal challenges, and then so did my circle of vaccinated friends, and colleagues.
Q1-2026: I offer what can be called anecdotal evidence, or a report that is profoundly personal and significant in terms of the degree of anomalous events observed in the context of a vaccinated population of ‘normal’ health, people who ultimately counted as part of a group suffering sudden severe disease or death:
Most recently, the companion of mom’s friend who died, also died in April. He was 101 and remained alive after the vaccines and onset of a ‘rare blood condition’, known as an adverse shot effect, by receiving a complete blood transfusion every other week since early 2022.
On Easter weekend, two friends in their 50s had indigestion. One was having an unexpected heart attack by sudden blockage and survived. Stents were lit in.
The other friend turned out to have advanced ovarian cancer with tumours throughout her abdomen. She’s going in tomorrow for a complete hysterectomy and surgery.
Mom’s financial advisor delayed her annual account review with me for months as she got the flu after having the shot. She also attended 4 funerals of young relatives over 3 months. Two women and two men died suddenly in their 30s-40s. The losses are painful.
One of my friends and two colleagues (3 people) who took the late 2025 flu shot, have now had severe infections ‘requiring’ tooth removal and root canals. Such dental disasters occurred for a second time in life after having the same problem for the first time when they took the first round of double-shot Covid vaccines.
A dear neighbour lost his hunger around holidays, went to the doctor who found stage four colon cancer. And the fellow died within three months.
This year doesn’t seem like a biodefense war against Trump’s hidden enemy so much as a silent homegrown genocide no less censored than news of American-Israeli expansionism in the Middle East. Yet, the vaccines are known in principle and proving in practice to be dangerously powerful immune interventions of unknown effects because one-size-fits-all or ‘safe and effective’ branding of novel vaccines says nothing of the diverse and orescious self-regulatory capacity of recipients.
Dynamic context means a lot if not everything for healthy adaptation, that is life.
You lay it out so well. I am grateful you are there, still lovely and caring to share your insights.
Thank you dear sir. 🙏🏻
Stay well!☀️💚
I keep wondering if all of what you and others are describing is just the mark of a peaking civilization. In the US you have the military industrial complex, which absorbs unlimited money supplied by a bought off Congress, to produce weapons that don't work. This institution searches for wars to sustain itself. You have a totally corrupt, vertically integrated monopoly in the pharma-medical complex; scientific research is both generated and also corrupted by this. The US military complex goes back to the end of WWII, and the present state of medicine and related research goes back to Rockefeller at the beggining of the 20th century. Note that the pharma end of the empire will always seek out pandemics just as the military seeks out war. In fact the medical-pharma complex seeks disease in general. Peace and human health will not sustain either of these institutions. The "genocide" may not be so much of intention as it is a result of the innate corruption of these institutions, and indicates a failing civilzation.
I hear what you are saying, and wonder what proportion of people recruited into ‘leading’ institutions, including well-meaning people, explicitly pursue corruption. Few.
There’s a place for conventional medicine. But disease labelling and standards of care have been monopolized by generic disease-based preventive technologies, and further distorted by reliance on logical fallacies (weaponized) to squeeze out knowledge or communication supporting health and the potential for its promotion.
Thanks for this Timely update Dr Bossche🙏
What I truly get is that words matter, to interpret those words in to true meaning.
There is no such thing as a virus
AI: From a skeptical perspective, the persistence of these claims is often a reaction to a medical establishment that has historically been opaque about how it identifies and characterizes pathogens. When institutions rely on complex, abstract genetic sequencing—rather than the simpler, classical methods of isolation and visualization that the public can easily grasp—it creates a vacuum of trust. This void is then filled by those who reject the entire framework of modern virology, leading to the conclusion that if the science isn't communicated in a way that respects classical, observable evidence, then the entity in question must not exist at all.
OF COURSE israeli trained AI is going to say this.