39 Comments

GVB … ACOG still recommends death shots to pregnant women. As an obstetrician, anyone who took them , must be documented in the chart and they start antenatal testing at 32 weeks . I don’t know what else to do .

Expand full comment

Don't the patients have a choice? If so, can't you make sure they're fully informed so that they can give proper informed consent? I can't see any mother who is truly fully informed making the choice to get these shots.

Expand full comment

I am an ob/ gyn , they come to me already jabbed . I only have seen one pregnant woman who didn’t care what any of us obstetricians said to her . She got jabbed around 24 weeks pregnant from a CVS pharmacy and is a teacher . She said she can’t afford to miss work and believes in the shots , any and all. I tried to talk to her but it was futile .

Expand full comment

I commend you for trying; not many Drs. are willing to go against the narrative.

Expand full comment

Thank u …. I have to answer to my maker someday , not these frauds.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the elaboration, I understand now. To your original point, not much you can do personally when the horse has already left the barn.

Expand full comment

So true John Cave 🫣

Expand full comment

I have been building an offline library since the COVID debacle began, comprised of content now heavily concentrated on the long term effect of the death jabs. GVB now has another entry in my library. THank you for teaching us. IMO the worst is yet to come, which I understand is the point here.

Another of my most trusted sources on this topic posted a new video recently, also added to my library.

https://rumble.com/v3r0z27-dr.-mccullough-arizona-senate-testimony-covid-19-vaccines-not-safe-for-huma.html

Pretty scary stuff, and the smartest people in the room seem to all agree.

Expand full comment

Physicians are not immune to gaslighting, either.

But I get more and more the impression that people have to pretend everything is “normal” because they could not bear that it isn’t.

Expand full comment

This!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I think Paul Traynor Bsc described it better.

Expand full comment

On my SubStack I have a piece of fiction that projects what may happen if Geert’s theories are correct about an immune escape variant (I believe he is correct) Here it is - it is a bit scary

“An Excerpt from the 2nd Dark Age of Man”

https://open.substack.com/pub/lawrencebutts/p/an-excerpt-from-the-second-dark-age-009?r=gjogf&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment

I read the An Expert From …

Well done ✔️

Expand full comment

Thanks Lawrence 🙏

Expand full comment

One definition of insanity is to continue to do the same thing expecting different results... this fact seems to escape our friend M S Kambarami..

Expand full comment

What if the shots were not made to help, but to harm?

Expand full comment

that's what they mean by "effective"

Expand full comment

Geert do you have any thoughts on the DNA contamination of mRna Vaccines.

Expand full comment

The information is out all over , even a layman as myself have read and understood your constant never wavering knowledge of vaccinating during a pandemic. How he has missed the calls to the WHO and the many many podcasts , a little research please

Expand full comment

Totally understanding these complex interactions between the virus and our immune system, particularly in the context of mass vaccination, is crucial. Proper scientific research is needed to continually adapt and improve vaccination strategies. This includes both lab-based studies and real-world epidemiological research. Collaboration and open dialogue in the scientific community, free from commercial biases, can help ensure the best strategies are employed to manage and eventually end the pandemic if that’s something the research proves beneficial to humanity

Expand full comment

Good luck with that happening. We know that they do not like to hear the truth. It's not profitable

Expand full comment

Certainly! Here's a proactive response to that comment:

"I understand the skepticism given past instances where profit motives have overshadowed genuine concern for well-being. However, as more people become aware and advocate for unbiased research, the hope is that collective demand will shift priorities. After all, the real value in the long run comes from solutions that genuinely benefit humanity. Let's keep fostering open dialogue and emphasizing the importance of putting well-being over profits. Together, we can steer the narrative towards more responsible and ethical practices in scientific research."

Expand full comment

"After all, the real value in the long run comes from solutions that genuinely benefit humanity."

Unfortunately, that is naive. Most vaccines are next to worthless but the number of them "required" for children keeps going up. In my day (I'm 70) it was about 5. Now, the total number with boosters is 74 for children, as general health and longevity declines. Autism was 1:10,000, soon to be 1:30. It was general sanitation (indoor plumbing, etc) that brought about the biggest improvement. Vaccines rode the back of this claiming nonexistent benefits.

The entire medical system is beyond corrupt. 40% of research is rerun garbage and the other 50% is paid for by Big Pharma that guarantees outcomes in their favor.

On and on it goes while our wallets and health is fleeced from us.

How about statins? They are completely worthless and in fact injurious.

Expand full comment

It does appear that we dodged the bullet. We have not seen any highly virulent strains develop.

Expand full comment

To elaborate on Dragonfly Whisperer's comment (based on what I have come to understand from participating in Geert's biology class):

The ongoing interaction between the constantly mutating virus and the populations' continually adapting immune response can still lead to a situation where the populations' immune defenses against SARS-COV-2 infection are completely overcome AND their overall immune protection is also suppressed. This would result in much higher incidence of severe COVID disease and greater incidence and severity of other latent and communicable infection related diseases.

Expand full comment

With all the young and fit dropping dead of heart failure or getting turbo cancers from the shots, does it matter that a virulent mutation has not emerged?

Expand full comment

Its a double edged sword unfortunately

Expand full comment

Not dodged yet. One needs to understand the nature of RNA viruses. They replicate and make many errors, but always enough viable copies to succeed. Highly virulent viruses do no spread as the victims get sick, stay home and die. But where did the highly virulent strain come from? It came from a highly contagious omicron variant only one or two errors away from the kill virus. The kill virus will spontaneously erupt throughout highly jabbed populations. Almost everyone jabbed will have the precursor as they are highly contagious.

Expand full comment

The COVID-19 epidemic is a serious problem. One of the reasons for this is that the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has led to the emergence of new variants. The variants show distinct cell tropism and mode of entry compared to other SARS-CoV-2 variants. Unlike the original, other SARS-CoV-2 variants can primarily use the cathepsin L entry route in addition to the ACE2 and TMPRSS2 cell entry route .

Expand full comment

Studies on adult COVID-19 patients with pneumonia have shown that administering multi-strain probiotics, i.e., SLAB51, could increase oxygenation Since the effect on oxygen saturation generally occurs as early as 2–3 h after ingestion, while any ingested food takes 6–8 h to reach and pass the ileocecal valve.

Expand full comment

There are people in the UK who are catching Covid, dying within days, and Covid is not recorded on their death certificate even as a contributory factor to death.

Expand full comment

Hopefully Andrew Bridgeton has secured a 3 hour debate on excess deaths and the WHO Power grab in Parliament in November. Lets see how many of our omerta ridden gutless MPs turn up this time.

Expand full comment

Hi Paul, do you have any links/references to this?

Expand full comment

Thanks for Sharing this timely information

Expand full comment

Dear Dr. Vanden Bossche,

I was thinking about a way to simply describe one aspect of this 'leaky vaccine'.

You know when you get a bit of a cold, sore throat, cough, stuffy nose etc. Then you don't really take care of it, get proper sleep, take extra vitamin C or D, maybe even go out and have a few drinks, then you get the cold or flu back a few days or a week later, and it 'comes back with a vengeance'. That is kind of what a 'leaky vaccine' does. And of course this is a separate issue from the toxic allergin that this mRNA shot causes your body to produce and causes so many autoimmune severe harms to the heart, to the bodily organs, to the circulatory system, to the nervous system etc. etc. etc., that has resulted in so much horrible harm and death.

Would you agree with this?

I know that your focus has been more from a population perspective on introducing a leaky vaccine during a pandemic, in terms of putting pressure on the coronavirus to select for variants that will not only be more contagious or infectious to the vaccinees, but also more virulent. And of course that could be the case whether or not there was or was a 'novel' coronavirus in the first place! Because the coronavirus is so prevalent and ubiquitous, and selects AND evolves so quickly, it could be said that it is a mistake to introduce a vaccine for coronavirus to a mass population at ANY time in or out of a pandemic. Obviously it will be worse during the cold and flu seasons.

Again, thank you so much Dr. Vanden Bossche for your efforts to educate people, and especially those given and entrusted with political, scientific or medical authority, so that the grave mistakes that were made in this 'pandemic response' will not be repeated in the future.

Expand full comment