What more evidence do we really need?

The Covid-19 vaccination hoax is best summarized in the work of M.N. Mead et al. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38274635/). This narrative review unambiguously demonstrates that the Covid-19 (C-19) vaccines are neither safe nor efficacious, and their quality has consistently fallen short. Even though this amazing piece of work does not put much emphasis on what I believe remains the biggest concern related to the mass vaccination program—namely, viral immune evasion due to the emergence of virulence-inhibiting non-neutralizing antibodies following immune refocusing—, it stands in my humble opinion as the most comprehensive and unbiased scientific review I’ve encountered on this topic. This publication together with my recent contribution (https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/critique-to-cdc-publications) are a must- read for both the medical/scientific community and the general public in order to fully grasp the insanity of the C-19 mass vaccination program. While my recent contribution pales in comparison to the remarkable work achieved by M.N. Mead et al., it clearly shows that the reported effectiveness of the bivalent C-19 vaccines or updated vaccine boosters does NOT directly result from the vaccines themselves. Instead, it stems from non-specific, short-lived immune protective mechanisms that resulted from VBTI (vaccine breakthrough infection)-mediated immune refocusing. These ‘pseudo’-protective mechanisms are now causing highly C-19 vaccinated populations to exert high immune selection pressure on viral virulence...

Scientists and experts who continue to deny this overwhelming amount of evidence while studying the pandemic are not worthy of the title 'scientist' or 'expert'. Their futile attempts to contradict scientific logic with contrived statistical constructs only make their position more precarious. Therefore, I have decided to distance myself from their ‘pseudo’-scientific convulsions and dedicate my valuable time to those who have suffered the consequences of the intellectual laziness of these so-called experts and their misuse of their influential positions to hide their conflicts of interest.