A new scientific paper suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 (SC-2) sublineage BA.3.2.2 may be spreading more easily in children and that children could become a reservoir from which new variants might emerge (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.730251v2.full
Of course, blaming our children is a way to promote their junk. Damaging our children for life in a vaccination campaign aimed at the weakest in society who cannot defend themselves and are ignorant.
There is an old saying: *In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.*
The saying assumes that superior perception naturally produces authority. It rarely does.
A person who sees something others do not is often not elevated but isolated. His perception may contradict the assumptions upon which the group has built its understanding of reality. In such cases, the group does not experience him as an asset. It experiences him as a disturbance.
The usual response is to blame communication. If only he could explain himself better, he would be understood. Sometimes this is true. Often it is not.
Understanding requires more than words. It requires the capacity to receive what the words point toward. A truth can be perfectly expressed and still remain inaccessible to an audience that lacks the experiential or conceptual structures needed to grasp it. Communication is not always blocked by the speaker's inability to explain. Sometimes it is blocked by the listener's inability to understand.
This creates a deeper problem. How does one know whether one is genuinely perceiving something beyond the group's horizon, or merely mistaken? The visionary and the crank can sound remarkably similar. Both may insist that others cannot see what they see.
There is no final method for resolving this dilemma.
Humility begins when one recognizes that neither the individual nor the group possesses an absolute vantage point. Each is an element within a larger gestalt.
The group behaves according to its own nature. It accepts, rejects, celebrates, or persecutes according to characteristics that belong to the group itself. No individual, however perceptive, can compel the gestalt to understand. Likewise, the gestalt cannot compel the individual to stop perceiving what he perceives.
The one-eyed man is therefore neither king nor victim by necessity. He is simply an element of a larger whole whose trajectory is not his to control.
Recognizing this does not answer the question of whether one is a seer or a crank. It renders the question less important. The individual can observe, interpret, and act according to what appears true, while understanding that the larger pattern will unfold according to its own nature.
The humility lies in realizing that one is not the author of the gestalt, but one of its expressions.
When following Dr Bossche I often wonder why there is no reference to John Campbell's interview of the Australian scientist, Professor Robert Clancy. In the latest interview Clancy provides an unbelievable description of the innate immune system's production of T-cells in the gut, and the relationship to the respiratory mucosa. It would seem that this innate system is what has delayed the grand finale that Bossche has described for three years. The latest interview of Clancy can be found here, https://youtu.be/ZjjYaO1tIJM?si=KCyLKzm3XQBH8A-X
At my level Bossche and Clancy are quite consistent or at least complimentary in what they have to say.
I still or now think that your deductions may be too complicated for anyone, even lazy me, but my wife Ann-Cathrin might undedrstand if she has the time to read all.
My own deductions are more simple that children is no problem and SHOULD NOT be vaccinated against covid-19 nor most adults and that these subsubsub...variants ON THE SURFACE proteins are inrelevant to the strategy.
OK there was some evil additions in the first SARS-CoV-2 original lab virus regarding at least human RNA-mitochondria sequences discovered 2021, but after these new variants delta, omicron etc etc sequences that do not support a better circulation of the variants should be downregulated compared to others due to the extra cost of replicating with those sequences as well.
It is in line with Ann-Catrin Engwall von Schéele's claim in Swedish newspaper article in Svenska dagbladet Aug 28 2009 and The Great Barrington Declaration 2021
Are these publications that you critique, the pretext or propaganda post-script to justify the recent US plan of funding $1.2 billion more as new funding of Pfizer for paediatric injections of the SARSCov2 modRNA countermeasures technologies?
They wan´t to do the same mistake one more time. Only children in high vaccinated populations, can be that barrier to slow down virus or to be surviving people with herd immunity.
Of course, blaming our children is a way to promote their junk. Damaging our children for life in a vaccination campaign aimed at the weakest in society who cannot defend themselves and are ignorant.
# The One-Eyed Man Is Not King
There is an old saying: *In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.*
The saying assumes that superior perception naturally produces authority. It rarely does.
A person who sees something others do not is often not elevated but isolated. His perception may contradict the assumptions upon which the group has built its understanding of reality. In such cases, the group does not experience him as an asset. It experiences him as a disturbance.
The usual response is to blame communication. If only he could explain himself better, he would be understood. Sometimes this is true. Often it is not.
Understanding requires more than words. It requires the capacity to receive what the words point toward. A truth can be perfectly expressed and still remain inaccessible to an audience that lacks the experiential or conceptual structures needed to grasp it. Communication is not always blocked by the speaker's inability to explain. Sometimes it is blocked by the listener's inability to understand.
This creates a deeper problem. How does one know whether one is genuinely perceiving something beyond the group's horizon, or merely mistaken? The visionary and the crank can sound remarkably similar. Both may insist that others cannot see what they see.
There is no final method for resolving this dilemma.
Humility begins when one recognizes that neither the individual nor the group possesses an absolute vantage point. Each is an element within a larger gestalt.
The group behaves according to its own nature. It accepts, rejects, celebrates, or persecutes according to characteristics that belong to the group itself. No individual, however perceptive, can compel the gestalt to understand. Likewise, the gestalt cannot compel the individual to stop perceiving what he perceives.
The one-eyed man is therefore neither king nor victim by necessity. He is simply an element of a larger whole whose trajectory is not his to control.
Recognizing this does not answer the question of whether one is a seer or a crank. It renders the question less important. The individual can observe, interpret, and act according to what appears true, while understanding that the larger pattern will unfold according to its own nature.
The humility lies in realizing that one is not the author of the gestalt, but one of its expressions.
Much gooder!
Viruses don’t exist!
You are a fucking RETARD!
When following Dr Bossche I often wonder why there is no reference to John Campbell's interview of the Australian scientist, Professor Robert Clancy. In the latest interview Clancy provides an unbelievable description of the innate immune system's production of T-cells in the gut, and the relationship to the respiratory mucosa. It would seem that this innate system is what has delayed the grand finale that Bossche has described for three years. The latest interview of Clancy can be found here, https://youtu.be/ZjjYaO1tIJM?si=KCyLKzm3XQBH8A-X
At my level Bossche and Clancy are quite consistent or at least complimentary in what they have to say.
I still or now think that your deductions may be too complicated for anyone, even lazy me, but my wife Ann-Cathrin might undedrstand if she has the time to read all.
My own deductions are more simple that children is no problem and SHOULD NOT be vaccinated against covid-19 nor most adults and that these subsubsub...variants ON THE SURFACE proteins are inrelevant to the strategy.
OK there was some evil additions in the first SARS-CoV-2 original lab virus regarding at least human RNA-mitochondria sequences discovered 2021, but after these new variants delta, omicron etc etc sequences that do not support a better circulation of the variants should be downregulated compared to others due to the extra cost of replicating with those sequences as well.
So overall no big thing...
My proof of strategy still is relevant :
https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/cell-mediated-immunity-neglected-influenza-vaccination-strategies
It is in line with Ann-Catrin Engwall von Schéele's claim in Swedish newspaper article in Svenska dagbladet Aug 28 2009 and The Great Barrington Declaration 2021
https://gbdeclaration.org/
So YOU maybe wright but maybe zero people even experts may be too lazy to try to understand the details :-)
The pig in the trough is so reluctant to say it is full.
I just found your other paper. Sorry for asking:
Are these publications that you critique, the pretext or propaganda post-script to justify the recent US plan of funding $1.2 billion more as new funding of Pfizer for paediatric injections of the SARSCov2 modRNA countermeasures technologies?
Yes. And the. Some.
🙏🏻☀️
Isn't 322 SKULL and BONES Yale Cult ##### https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones
They wan´t to do the same mistake one more time. Only children in high vaccinated populations, can be that barrier to slow down virus or to be surviving people with herd immunity.